Spanking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"
A couple times he would, totally unprovoked, push his little brother down because he thought watching him fall was hilarious. Another time he kept undoing his car seat straps."

I would do it for the car seat.

I wouldn't for the pushing.

One is literally a danger to his life. The other is just normal behavior that needs to be adjusted.

I think you have a poor understanding of risk. One car ride unrestrained is a lot safer statistically than a guaranteed fall and hitting your head.

The little brother is under the age of 4 since the boy in question is 4. Why do you think he's hitting his head? My niece is 2 and falls all the time and has never been severely injured. Hell, half the time she doesn't even cry.

He hit his head at least one time, the time that I saw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh god. So barbaric, and so low class. Literally one of the trashiest parenting moves out there. Not to mention sickening

What is actually low class is having kids who need to be spanked, and are entitled and tedious, yet their parents are so desperately trying to be UMC and enlightened that they don't discipline them.

In the actual upper classes, spanking is incredibly common.

Do you have any evidence to cite that spanking is incredibly common in the actual upper classes? That's where I am and we would never consider spanking. Ever. And my friends in the actual upper classes don't spank either.

Can't wait to see your evidence of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh god. So barbaric, and so low class. Literally one of the trashiest parenting moves out there. Not to mention sickening

What is actually low class is having kids who need to be spanked, and are entitled and tedious, yet their parents are so desperately trying to be UMC and enlightened that they don't discipline them.

In the actual upper classes, spanking is incredibly common.

Do you have any evidence to cite that spanking is incredibly common in the actual upper classes? That's where I am and we would never consider spanking. Ever. And my friends in the actual upper classes don't spank either.

Can't wait to see your evidence of this.

OP. DH and I are objectively upper class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it especially funny when people say, "I was spanked and look at me I'm fine".

Most the time I want to say... you have anxieties, a really bad temper and have you seen yourself on the sidelines of your kids game?

Sure you are okay?!?

Just because you have $$$ does not mean you are okay. They don't even see it.

? So everyone who has anxiety and a really bad temper were spanked as children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It IS funny to see someone fall down! He's not wrong. That's why prat falls are a thing. That's why this type of thing gets tons of views: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KWVnJfBGbs

Again, the fact that your husband has to hit more than once means that your child is NOT learning from the spankings. You are lazy. Find a different way to discipline.

Not OP.. do time outs work on your kids every time? I don't think so. But you still probably did time outs and sticker charts, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It IS funny to see someone fall down! He's not wrong. That's why prat falls are a thing. That's why this type of thing gets tons of views: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KWVnJfBGbs

Again, the fact that your husband has to hit more than once means that your child is NOT learning from the spankings. You are lazy. Find a different way to discipline.

Are you suggesting that each kid will never need more than one timeout?

I didn't say Timeout is my method of discipline.

Please tell us your fool-proof method that your child has only experienced ONCE, and it cured all misbehavior for life. I'd love to hear this.

+1 And I'm sure so would every parent out there. Except, that PP has not parented every single child out there, so..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh god. So barbaric, and so low class. Literally one of the trashiest parenting moves out there. Not to mention sickening

What is actually low class is having kids who need to be spanked, and are entitled and tedious, yet their parents are so desperately trying to be UMC and enlightened that they don't discipline them.

In the actual upper classes, spanking is incredibly common.

Do you have any evidence to cite that spanking is incredibly common in the actual upper classes? That's where I am and we would never consider spanking. Ever. And my friends in the actual upper classes don't spank either.

Can't wait to see your evidence of this.

DP. That's what you think.

[Anonymous]

I'll wade into this fray. I have spanked my daughter, currently five, and would do so again. I'm not particularly proud of it, and I didn't set out to have that within the repertoire of our parenting/discipline techniques. I was never opposed to it, though, and we came to a point when she was around 3 1/2 or 4 when we decided it was necessary because nothing else worked to address a particular problem we were having, namely, her throwing huge tantrums at bedtime and overnight. I'm sure I'll get flamed for spanking over bedtime issues, what's the big deal, but the issues were severe, disrupting the entire family, and basically allowing her to rule the roost, which we did not want to tolerate. We tried everything else, including positive reinforcement via rewards/bribes, silent walk-back, co-sleeping, locking her in her room, everything. Over a period of months. We came to spanking because (1) we couldn't *make* her do the behavior we needed her to do, i.e., stay in bed and sleep, and (2) she was old enough to understood the issue and the punishment but not old enough to be out of that terribly irrational stage. So, we implemented a relatively mild physical punishment to correct the behavior. She has been spanked probably a total of 8 to 10 times, over the past two years. We also implemented spanking for her deliberately trying to break things, for example, kicking a door (she split the admittedly cheap wood on her closet door at the bottom) or trying to pull over a shelf (which she almost pulled over onto herself).

She obviously throws severe tantrums. I will note she did this before we ever started spanking. As she has aged, she has gotten better though she remains just a volatile child. Ironically, it is my perception that spanking helps her calm down faster. I believe that she CAN control herself, but she needs a real push to do so, and spanking provides that. I have also tried staying with her when she tantrums, doing the time-in thing; my presence would work her up more.

We also utilize time-outs, 123 magic, and positive reinforcement. We praise good behavior, have rewards sticker charts, etc. I do consider myself pretty strict on many things, I just don't enforce most things via spanking.

We also have a son, and he has a totally different personality. I very seriously doubt I"ll need to spank him and if I don't, I won't. I also don't anticipate spanking my daughter for much longer, because I feel less comfortable spanking an older child.

We spank by leaning her over a chair or her bed and giving her firm swats on the bottom, one for each year of age. We are calm when we do it, not out of anger.

DH got "swats" as a child for misbehavior such as not behaving during church. I don't think it was frequent. DH is extremely close with his parents. I was spanked but it was more like a hit, and it was definitely out of anger by my dad. It was infrequent though, but I was scared of him as a child. We have a fine relationship now.

We are UMC and were raised middle class to UMC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh god. So barbaric, and so low class. Literally one of the trashiest parenting moves out there. Not to mention sickening

What is actually low class is having kids who need to be spanked, and are entitled and tedious, yet their parents are so desperately trying to be UMC and enlightened that they don't discipline them.

In the actual upper classes, spanking is incredibly common.

Do you have any evidence to cite that spanking is incredibly common in the actual upper classes? That's where I am and we would never consider spanking. Ever. And my friends in the actual upper classes don't spank either.

Can't wait to see your evidence of this.

DP. That's what you think.

Still waiting for evidence to show this is true. I tend to believe my friends when they say they don't spank. Too bad your friends lie to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'll wade into this fray. I have spanked my daughter, currently five, and would do so again. I'm not particularly proud of it, and I didn't set out to have that within the repertoire of our parenting/discipline techniques. I was never opposed to it, though, and we came to a point when she was around 3 1/2 or 4 when we decided it was necessary because nothing else worked to address a particular problem we were having, namely, her throwing huge tantrums at bedtime and overnight. I'm sure I'll get flamed for spanking over bedtime issues, what's the big deal, but the issues were severe, disrupting the entire family, and basically allowing her to rule the roost, which we did not want to tolerate. We tried everything else, including positive reinforcement via rewards/bribes, silent walk-back, co-sleeping, locking her in her room, everything. Over a period of months. We came to spanking because (1) we couldn't *make* her do the behavior we needed her to do, i.e., stay in bed and sleep, and (2) she was old enough to understood the issue and the punishment but not old enough to be out of that terribly irrational stage. So, we implemented a relatively mild physical punishment to correct the behavior. She has been spanked probably a total of 8 to 10 times, over the past two years. We also implemented spanking for her deliberately trying to break things, for example, kicking a door (she split the admittedly cheap wood on her closet door at the bottom) or trying to pull over a shelf (which she almost pulled over onto herself).

She obviously throws severe tantrums. I will note she did this before we ever started spanking. As she has aged, she has gotten better though she remains just a volatile child. Ironically, it is my perception that spanking helps her calm down faster. I believe that she CAN control herself, but she needs a real push to do so, and spanking provides that. I have also tried staying with her when she tantrums, doing the time-in thing; my presence would work her up more.

We also utilize time-outs, 123 magic, and positive reinforcement. We praise good behavior, have rewards sticker charts, etc. I do consider myself pretty strict on many things, I just don't enforce most things via spanking.

We also have a son, and he has a totally different personality. I very seriously doubt I"ll need to spank him and if I don't, I won't. I also don't anticipate spanking my daughter for much longer, because I feel less comfortable spanking an older child.

We spank by leaning her over a chair or her bed and giving her firm swats on the bottom, one for each year of age. We are calm when we do it, not out of anger.

DH got "swats" as a child for misbehavior such as not behaving during church. I don't think it was frequent. DH is extremely close with his parents. I was spanked but it was more like a hit, and it was definitely out of anger by my dad. It was infrequent though, but I was scared of him as a child. We have a fine relationship now.

We are UMC and were raised middle class to UMC.

You suck. You should be ashamed of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh god. So barbaric, and so low class. Literally one of the trashiest parenting moves out there. Not to mention sickening

What is actually low class is having kids who need to be spanked, and are entitled and tedious, yet their parents are so desperately trying to be UMC and enlightened that they don't discipline them.

In the actual upper classes, spanking is incredibly common.

Do you have any evidence to cite that spanking is incredibly common in the actual upper classes? That's where I am and we would never consider spanking. Ever. And my friends in the actual upper classes don't spank either.

Can't wait to see your evidence of this.

DP. That's what you think.

Still waiting for evidence to show this is true. I tend to believe my friends when they say they don't spank. Too bad your friends lie to you.

I'm not sure what evidence you're raving on about. If you are actually upperclass, and of my generation, so around 40, you would have gone to schools where corporal punishment was normal and accepted. But as for say studies? I didn't refer to a study. Feel free to try to find one saying the upper class don't spank but given that it would be reliant on self reporting? Who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"
A couple times he would, totally unprovoked, push his little brother down because he thought watching him fall was hilarious. Another time he kept undoing his car seat straps."

I would do it for the car seat.

I wouldn't for the pushing.

One is literally a danger to his life. The other is just normal behavior that needs to be adjusted.

I think you have a poor understanding of risk. One car ride unrestrained is a lot safer statistically than a guaranteed fall and hitting your head.

The little brother is under the age of 4 since the boy in question is 4. Why do you think he's hitting his head? My niece is 2 and falls all the time and has never been severely injured. Hell, half the time she doesn't even cry.

I have a niece who rides in a car all the time, and she's never been seriously injured either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is such a white American discussion.

Spanking is not associated with negative outcomes across all cultures. For example, in black Americans some studies have found that spanking has an inverse association with outcomes. Here's an excerpt from NurtureShock:

Excerpt from Nurture Shock, p. 186-187:

“...so Dodge conducted a long-term study of corporal punishment’s affect on 453 kids, both black and white, tracking them from kindergarten through eleventh grade.
When Dodge’s team presented its findings at a conference, the data did not make people happy. This wasn’t because blacks used corporal punishment more than whites. (They did, but not by much.) Rather, Dodge’s team had found a reverse correlation in black families - the more a child was spanked, the less aggressive the child over time. The spanked black kid was all around less likely to be in trouble.

Scholars publicly castigated Dodge’s team, saying its findings were racist and dangerous to report. Journalists rushed to interview Dodge and the study’s lead author, Dr. Jennifer Lansford. A national news reporter asked Dodge if his research meant the key to effective punishment was to hit children more frequently. The reporter may have been facetious in his query, but Dodge and Lansford - both of whom remain adamantly against the use of physical discipline - were so horrified by such questions that they enlisted a team of fourteen scholars to study the use of corporal punishment around the world.

Why would spanking trigger such problems in white children, but cause no problems for black children, even when used a little more frequently? With the help of the subsequent international studies, Dodge has pieced together an explanation for his team’s results. To understand, one has to consider how the parent is acting when giving the spanking, and how those actions label the child. In a culture where spanking is accepted practice [an African-American community, in this study’s case], it becomes ‘the normal thing that goes on in this culture when a kid does something he shouldn’t.’ Even if the parent might spank her child only two or three times in his life, it’s treated as ordinary consequences. In the black community Dodge studied, a spanking was seen as something that every kid went through.

Conversely, in the white community Dodge studied, physical discipline was a mostly-unspoken taboo. It was saved only for the worst offenses. The parent was usually very angry at the child and had lost his or her temper. The implicit message was: ‘What you have done is so deviant that you deserve a special punishment, which is spanking.’ It marked the child as someone who has lost his place within traditional society.

It’s not just a white-black thing either. A University of Texas study of conservative Protestants found that one-third of them spanked their kids three or more times a week, largely encouraged by Dr. James Dobson’s Focus on the Family. The study found no negative effects from this corporal punishment - precisely because it was conveyed as normal.

Each in its own way, the work of Cummings and Dodge demonstrate the same dynamic: an oversimplified view of aggression leads parents to sometimes makes it worse for kids when they’re trying to do the right thing. Children key off their parents’ reaction more than the argument or physical discipline itself.”

And here's a link to the original study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772061/

Alfie Kohn has a good rebuttal to this in Unconditional Parenting. Nurture Shock in general is some good science mixed with junk science.

PP here. Can you summarize since no link? Also, why do you think Nurture Shock contains junk science?

[Anonymous]

MY parents were born in the 1940s. BOth were spanked by their parents. They resent it to this day. THey did not spank my sibling or myself, nor did my sibling and I spank our now teen children, even though they engaged in the type of behavior OP describes, which I consider normal and not egregious. My children are well behaved, give me little trouble at home, and I have never gotten any complaints from school. I think there are plenty of other options besides spanking that get you these results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh god. So barbaric, and so low class. Literally one of the trashiest parenting moves out there. Not to mention sickening

What is actually low class is having kids who need to be spanked, and are entitled and tedious, yet their parents are so desperately trying to be UMC and enlightened that they don't discipline them.

In the actual upper classes, spanking is incredibly common.

Do you have any evidence to cite that spanking is incredibly common in the actual upper classes? That's where I am and we would never consider spanking. Ever. And my friends in the actual upper classes don't spank either.

Can't wait to see your evidence of this.

DP. That's what you think.

Still waiting for evidence to show this is true. I tend to believe my friends when they say they don't spank. Too bad your friends lie to you.

I'm not sure what evidence you're raving on about. If you are actually upperclass, and of my generation, so around 40, you would have gone to schools where corporal punishment was normal and accepted. But as for say studies? I didn't refer to a study. Feel free to try to find one saying the upper class don't spank but given that it would be reliant on self reporting? Who cares?

I would just like to know how you "know" that in the upper class, spanking is incredibly common. Do you know this from friends? I want to know how you can back the claim that spanking is incredibly common in the upper class. Have you read something? I never mentioned a study, but you did. I'm not looking for a study. I am truly interested in how you can say this and know it to be true. You stated it as a fact -- how do you know this is true? From friends? check the dictionary for the definition of fact: something that actually exists; reality; truth

I certainly did not go to a school that allowed corporal punishment. I went to a private school where corporal punishment was not ever allowed. My parents would have never allowed us to go to a school that allowed spanking. Yes, they were against spanking back then.