How many men have you slept with?

[Anonymous]

34 years old, met my husband at 27, before him it's about 25 to 30, I can't remember really. I fully admit I was slutty and I have no regrets. I love sex and I know my DH is thankful for that

[Anonymous]

12. Married at 23, divorced at 29 (current age)

[Anonymous]

None! But I'm a guy. Seriously, I don't see the attraction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:6.

2 were one-two night stands I could have done without, but they weren't the worst. Best get THAT out of my system early.
1 was a boy I dated for a summer and I could have done without.
1 was a man I was really in love with but it ended.
1 was my husband.
1 was an affair with a married man.

Are you still married? Why did you have the affair?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked at the amount of "one only" people.

Me, too--and I'm one of them! Dh and I were both each other's firsts in college.

They either met their spouses very young or very physically unattractive (not meaning to be rude but I know some couples like this) or very shy.

Why? Literally everyone I know who has slept with one person fits one of the three categories.

NP- I think the opposite is true. The unattractive, chunky women always have higher numbers. It's a self-esteem thing or daddy issues. The really attractive, undamaged women aren't sleeping around.

Agreed. Beautiful women don't sleep around, in my experience

Ha! The idea that beautiful women are generally undamaged is the biggest crock of shit I've heard in a long time.

NP. Disagree. I actually think that a self-confident, self-assured beautiful woman don't sleep around. At least within AA circles. I am one of them, and have a flock of beautiful girlfriends, 3 of which were virgins who married and have only been with one. I recognize this is rare. But I also don't think that sleeping around = damaged goods. It's a very personal choice that some people do for different reasons. If there is damage in a woman that hasn't been repaired, it is usually there before the high count of partners...

[Anonymous]

39, 53 years old and went nuts after divorce (was a virgin on my wedding day). Current DH has high sex drive and when I told him the number when we started dating (I volunteered it), for whatever reason it turned him on and 25 years later he tells me it has the same effect. Who knows why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked at the amount of "one only" people.

Me, too--and I'm one of them! Dh and I were both each other's firsts in college.

They either met their spouses very young or very physically unattractive (not meaning to be rude but I know some couples like this) or very shy.

Why? Literally everyone I know who has slept with one person fits one of the three categories.

NP- I think the opposite is true. The unattractive, chunky women always have higher numbers. It's a self-esteem thing or daddy issues. The really attractive, undamaged women aren't sleeping around.

Agreed. Beautiful women don't sleep around, in my experience

Ha! The idea that beautiful women are generally undamaged is the biggest crock of shit I've heard in a long time.

NP. Disagree. I actually think that a self-confident, self-assured beautiful woman don't sleep around. At least within AA circles. I am one of them, and have a flock of beautiful girlfriends, 3 of which were virgins who married and have only been with one. I recognize this is rare. But I also don't think that sleeping around = damaged goods. It's a very personal choice that some people do for different reasons. If there is damage in a woman that hasn't been repaired, it is usually there before the high count of partners...

What are AA circles?

[Anonymous]

AA equals Afro-American

[Anonymous]

So, that stuff about needing an emotional connection to have sex is mostly just bullshit, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, that stuff about needing an emotional connection to have sex is mostly just bullshit, right?

Depends. More than once or twice with an amazing guy I lose my ability to "get there" w/o connection. Good, solid guys - need it from the beginning.

[Anonymous]

One

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked at the amount of "one only" people.

Me, too--and I'm one of them! Dh and I were both each other's firsts in college.

They either met their spouses very young or very physically unattractive (not meaning to be rude but I know some couples like this) or very shy.

Why? Literally everyone I know who has slept with one person fits one of the three categories.

NP- I think the opposite is true. The unattractive, chunky women always have higher numbers. It's a self-esteem thing or daddy issues. The really attractive, undamaged women aren't sleeping around.

Agreed. Beautiful women don't sleep around, in my experience

Ha! The idea that beautiful women are generally undamaged is the biggest crock of shit I've heard in a long time.

NP. Disagree. I actually think that a self-confident, self-assured beautiful woman don't sleep around. At least within AA circles. I am one of them, and have a flock of beautiful girlfriends, 3 of which were virgins who married and have only been with one. I recognize this is rare. But I also don't think that sleeping around = damaged goods. It's a very personal choice that some people do for different reasons. If there is damage in a woman that hasn't been repaired, it is usually there before the high count of partners...

What are AA circles?

I think that this is an over generalization. I am an attractive AA woman. I was very self-assured and fit in college when I racked up a large number of sexual partners. Many of my friends, who are AA, did the same. We were having fun. Nothing more, nothing less. My sexual adventures were not at all tied to my self worth or a need.

[Anonymous]

I chose to marry late (40s) and began having sex in high school. I'm attractive and enjoy men and sex. So, over 20+ years I had a lot of both. There was some heartache, but for the most part, I had a blast. I would not change a thing. Like 20:55 said, it was fun.

Just because my choices weren't your choices doesn't make anyone damaged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm shocked at the amount of "one only" people.

Me, too--and I'm one of them! Dh and I were both each other's firsts in college.

They either met their spouses very young or very physically unattractive (not meaning to be rude but I know some couples like this) or very shy.

Why? Literally everyone I know who has slept with one person fits one of the three categories.

NP- I think the opposite is true. The unattractive, chunky women always have higher numbers. It's a self-esteem thing or daddy issues. The really attractive, undamaged women aren't sleeping around.

Agreed. Beautiful women don't sleep around, in my experience

I think both unattractive and unattractive women sleep around. Actually, I know both attractive and unattractive women sleep around.

Right, we're talking about BEAUTIFUL women, not merely attractive.

Oh right! Like Angelina Jolie? Amber Heard? January Jones? Miranda Kerr? Jennifer Lopez? Yes, pure as snow!

I can only hope PP is a clueless man equating beauty with virtue.

The lies men tell themselves, I swear.

[Anonymous]

6

Married at 35.