DOJ says Yale medical school discriminated against Asian, White applicants

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

[Anonymous]

Reading this thread it seems like dumber people must get significantly worse medical care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading this thread it seems like dumber people must get significantly worse medical care.

A lot of disadvantaged people with a low-level education in this country probably get almost no healthcare. Certainly not what they need. And Maga has done less then nothing to improve that situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

SCOTUS ruling in Harvard lawsuits says exactly the opposite. So who do we believe? The SCOTUS or a liberal racist liar like you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading this thread it seems like dumber people must get significantly worse medical care.

+1. “I’ll need to see a non-black doctor but also not one of those useless doctors. I’ll be the judge of how good this doctor is by how much they pretend to care about my trivial thoughts on bogus health ideas. Also bonus points if Latino appearing.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

Who are you to say what they want?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

SCOTUS ruling in Harvard lawsuits says exactly the opposite. So who do we believe? The SCOTUS or a liberal racist liar like you?

Scotus? Ruling after ruling wants to take us back to the supreme reign of the white man again. No thank you and no thank you from my daughters and sons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

No, bigot troll moron, what I want is effective doctors.

White doctors have been wildly ineffective at treating Black patients for literally hundreds of years, apparently due to implicit bias.

I want Black patients to get the same quality of care as white patients. That’s the difference between you and me - you, and current DOJ leadership, don’t want positive outcomes for Black patients because you are bigots. As noted white supremacist Laura Loomer correctly said in a rare lucid moment, the GOP has a Nazi problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If your doctor's taxes is important can I ask for a white doctor if I'm white? I would think and hope the answer would be 'no.'

Seeing a doctor is not like getting an oil change or buying a gallon of milk or learning soccer. It's an intimate relationship and some.peopme may need a white doctor or an Asian doctor or a female doctor or a black doctor for whatever reason.

Could I ask for a non-black doctor?

.
My racist old jackass grandfather certainly did. He was racist and he still needed to go to the doctor so he went to a white one. What the heck are people like him supposed to do?.

So... because you hate... your own grandfather... and since he was racist... Yale should be able to engage in ... DEI practices... forbidden by the supreme court???

Show me where the Supreme Court forbade “DEI practices.” Just because this incompetent and ideological DOJ says something is so does not mean that it is.

Their letter to Yale was embarrassing. They are so quick to conclude that a white person was discriminated against based on the flimsiest of evidence. And then they (and the Supreme Court) lecture us about how discrimination against black people is ancient history.

Isn't the head of the DOJ's civil rights division not white?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Justice Department concluded after a year-long investigation that Yale School of Medicine discriminated in admissions by favoring Black and Hispanic applicants over White and Asian applicants, saying Yale continued using race or race-linked factors after the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative-action ruling. DOJ cited admissions data and internal documents, including a claim that similarly qualified Black applicants had much higher interview odds than Asian applicants. Yale had not commented in the Washington Post report, and the case fits a broader Trump administration push against race-conscious admissions and DEI practices in higher education.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2026/05/14/doj-says-yale-medical-school-discriminated-against-asian-white-applicants/?utm_source=reddit.com

It is so wild to see this administration weaponize that old “reverse discrimination” trope

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread shows the liberals are the true racists.

.+1. DOJ found that UVA Medical School was doing the same. Google it.

This DOJ is going to find that every medical school was doing it. They're not going to stop until the demographic they're targeting stops applying completely.

That includes women, btw. They believe women should stay home, barefoot and pregnant or caregiving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a bummer as studies have shown repeatedly that health outcomes for black patients (especially for chronic conditions) are much better when they see black physicians. Individuals in race-matched pairings are far more likely to see their doctors and even their mortality rate decreases

Not a bummer at all. Don’t you want all doctors to meet the same qualifications regardless of race?

No, bigot troll moron, what I want is effective doctors.

White doctors have been wildly ineffective at treating Black patients for literally hundreds of years, apparently due to implicit bias.

I want Black patients to get the same quality of care as white patients. That’s the difference between you and me - you, and current DOJ leadership, don’t want positive outcomes for Black patients because you are bigots. As noted white supremacist Laura Loomer correctly said in a rare lucid moment, the GOP has a Nazi problem.

How do you know who will be an effective doctor before they begin training?

[Anonymous]

A pretty broad majority of doctors are white and Asian, along with medical students. At some point you have to question the intentions of someone who seems to really want to see 0% of medical students be black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

This belief is exactly the proof of the huge IQ discrepancy. A person with significantly lower IQ would have no idea of how smarter people could achieve certain things without grinding because the kind of aptitude is simply out of their imagination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYP wants the brightest Whites, Asians, Blacks, Latinos, Natives, etc. So, no, Cindy is not getting in just because she has a 1550 and a 4.0 because half the other Asian applicants are more impressive than that. Black/Latino/Native kids have historically been disadvantaged more than other races, so obviously they’re not all churning out 1580s left and right.

How do know who is the brightest? I thought it was just a sampling of the "qualified" because if you're qualified then it doesn't matter who is the best above that threshold. It can't be both.

Elite schools want people. Not robots who pump and grind 24/7 without a purpose. The essays act as the differentiators. You can be academically qualified with certain numbers but that doesn’t equal qualified personality wise.

Harvard is one of the most liberal institutions in the US. To say that the whole admissions office must be racist against Asians and deny that Asians routinely score low on personality traits is massive cope.

This belief is exactly the proof of the huge IQ discrepancy. A person with significantly lower IQ would have no idea of how smarter people could achieve certain things without grinding because the kind of aptitude is simply out of their imagination.

So obnoxious but also true.