2026 Golden Globes - Fashion, awards, show, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kylie Jenner looks stunning.

Are these hip implants??

I truly don’t get the hype around her. Her hips look really wide and she looks like she could be pregnant. I just don’t see why this is stunning.

I’ve always felt like all the Kardashians are average at best, but clearly people see something I don’t.

I think the Kardashians are really good at styling from head to toe. Hair, makeup, dress, jewelry, clutch, and shoes are always coordinated and the end result is always on brand: sexy. They bring a vibe.

I recently saw Kendall on a British Vogue runway clip and she has the same skinny waist and curvy hips. It’s the epitome of female sexuality.

Plus, Kylie’s dress is gorgeous. It stood out last night.

Now here’s what I can’t understand: what’s the appeal of Timothee Chalomet? I can’t find anything about him remotely attractive or special.

That's debatable. Beauty in the eyes of...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kylie Jenner looks stunning.

Are these hip implants??

I truly don’t get the hype around her. Her hips look really wide and she looks like she could be pregnant. I just don’t see why this is stunning.

I’ve always felt like all the Kardashians are average at best, but clearly people see something I don’t.

I think the Kardashians are really good at styling from head to toe. Hair, makeup, dress, jewelry, clutch, and shoes are always coordinated and the end result is always on brand: sexy. They bring a vibe.

I recently saw Kendall on a British Vogue runway clip and she has the same skinny waist and curvy hips. It’s the epitome of female sexuality.

Plus, Kylie’s dress is gorgeous. It stood out last night.

Now here’s what I can’t understand: what’s the appeal of Timothee Chalomet? I can’t find anything about him remotely attractive or special.

That's debatable. Beauty in the eyes of...

I don’t think society’s standards on femininity are debatable. Curves are feminine. Stick-thin, flat chested, flat butt women are a specific look—generally appealing to a very niche audience.

I mean, this goes back to the dawn of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kylie Jenner looks stunning.

Are these hip implants??

I truly don’t get the hype around her. Her hips look really wide and she looks like she could be pregnant. I just don’t see why this is stunning.

I’ve always felt like all the Kardashians are average at best, but clearly people see something I don’t.

I think the Kardashians are really good at styling from head to toe. Hair, makeup, dress, jewelry, clutch, and shoes are always coordinated and the end result is always on brand: sexy. They bring a vibe.

I recently saw Kendall on a British Vogue runway clip and she has the same skinny waist and curvy hips. It’s the epitome of female sexuality.

Plus, Kylie’s dress is gorgeous. It stood out last night.

Now here’s what I can’t understand: what’s the appeal of Timothee Chalomet? I can’t find anything about him remotely attractive or special.

That's debatable. Beauty in the eyes of...

I don’t think society’s standards on femininity are debatable. Curves are feminine. Stick-thin, flat chested, flat butt women are a specific look—generally appealing to a very niche audience.

I mean, this goes back to the dawn of time.

Amount of curve imhas never been agreed upon

[Anonymous]

*has

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I loved Rose Byrne's gown but the fit wasn't quite right, think the straps needed to be pulled up a touch.

Is her husband going to look back and say it was really worth it not being with my wife on the night she won a big award so I could pick up our new bearded dragon?

They’ve been to so many of these events, doubt they care one bit. Even when one of them wins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Parker Posey, awful (again):

I think she looks stunning.

Actresses should look like they stepped off a runway…not like they bought ready to wear from Bloomies.

Stepped off a runway?? Parker Posey looks like she made her dress out of curtains a la Gone With the Wind.

It’s custom Rodarte and fashion commentators are raving about it.

Goes to show you that the fashion commentators have poor taste.

I guess you missed the lecture in Devil Wears Prada, pp? Our opinions on fashion are relatively meaningless. There’s an entire industry of professionals who are qualified to say what is and isn’t good.

Fwiw, the pros are saying the custom silk Rodarte gown and how it was styled brought much needed drama to the fashion for the evening. It was meant to be costumey and over the top, and only someone as fashion-forward as Parker Posey could pull it off.

Wasn’t that whole lecture meant to be a joke? What gives Miranda any qualification to say what is and isn’t good?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My two favorites were amanda seyfried who looked ethereal and zoe kravitz (don't know how to post pics) - also really liked how a number of the more mature ladies went fashionable w/out looking like mother of the bride -amy poehler, diane lane, julia roberts,, krya sedgewick

Zoe looked like she was wearing a nightgown. And there were comments to some of the photos posted on instagram that her track mark bruises were fully visible. Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kylie Jenner looks stunning.

Are these hip implants??

I truly don’t get the hype around her. Her hips look really wide and she looks like she could be pregnant. I just don’t see why this is stunning.

I’ve always felt like all the Kardashians are average at best, but clearly people see something I don’t.

I think the Kardashians are really good at styling from head to toe. Hair, makeup, dress, jewelry, clutch, and shoes are always coordinated and the end result is always on brand: sexy. They bring a vibe.

I recently saw Kendall on a British Vogue runway clip and she has the same skinny waist and curvy hips. It’s the epitome of female sexuality.

Plus, Kylie’s dress is gorgeous. It stood out last night.

Now here’s what I can’t understand: what’s the appeal of Timothee Chalomet? I can’t find anything about him remotely attractive or special.

That's debatable. Beauty in the eyes of...

I don’t think society’s standards on femininity are debatable. Curves are feminine. Stick-thin, flat chested, flat butt women are a specific look—generally appealing to a very niche audience.

I mean, this goes back to the dawn of time.

Are you serious? Where were you when the question of whether Michelle Obama is a feminine woman was being debated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now Nikki is in red and looks amazing.

I didn't like the way she looked in her red dress. It made her hips look massive even though they actually are not. But I did enjoy her monologue. She was fantastic.

[Anonymous]

What do people think of Lisa's necklace? It's apparently a very high jewelry Bulgari item. It looks like a fake necklace I bought in 1980, and I'm iffy on the whole look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jen Garner looks like a natural beauty.

She is not. She looks like she had work done recently on her face and may be on Ozempic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kylie Jenner looks stunning.

Are these hip implants??

I truly don’t get the hype around her. Her hips look really wide and she looks like she could be pregnant. I just don’t see why this is stunning.

I’ve always felt like all the Kardashians are average at best, but clearly people see something I don’t.

I think the Kardashians are really good at styling from head to toe. Hair, makeup, dress, jewelry, clutch, and shoes are always coordinated and the end result is always on brand: sexy. They bring a vibe.

I recently saw Kendall on a British Vogue runway clip and she has the same skinny waist and curvy hips. It’s the epitome of female sexuality.

Plus, Kylie’s dress is gorgeous. It stood out last night.

Now here’s what I can’t understand: what’s the appeal of Timothee Chalomet? I can’t find anything about him remotely attractive or special.

That's debatable. Beauty in the eyes of...

I don’t think society’s standards on femininity are debatable. Curves are feminine. Stick-thin, flat chested, flat butt women are a specific look—generally appealing to a very niche audience.

I mean, this goes back to the dawn of time.

Different poster, but what I find debatable about the Kardashians is you can tell it’s not natural. I agree that the aesthetic is what you described but when it’s so obvious they have implants that don’t match their body, and other obvious things to their face - it just looks very unnatural to me.

I agree some people find this very attractive hence their popularity, but they’ve just never struck me as that attractive. They just all seem very fake and something looks off about all of their faces. I do Kim is the most attractive one. There is something very dead eyed about Kylie to me.

I can just think of dozens and dozens of other celebrities that I would rather look like if I had the choice than the Kardashians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kylie Jenner looks stunning.

Are these hip implants??

I truly don’t get the hype around her. Her hips look really wide and she looks like she could be pregnant. I just don’t see why this is stunning.

I’ve always felt like all the Kardashians are average at best, but clearly people see something I don’t.

I think the Kardashians are really good at styling from head to toe. Hair, makeup, dress, jewelry, clutch, and shoes are always coordinated and the end result is always on brand: sexy. They bring a vibe.

I recently saw Kendall on a British Vogue runway clip and she has the same skinny waist and curvy hips. It’s the epitome of female sexuality.

Plus, Kylie’s dress is gorgeous. It stood out last night.

Now here’s what I can’t understand: what’s the appeal of Timothee Chalomet? I can’t find anything about him remotely attractive or special.

That's debatable. Beauty in the eyes of...

I don’t think society’s standards on femininity are debatable. Curves are feminine. Stick-thin, flat chested, flat butt women are a specific look—generally appealing to a very niche audience.

I mean, this goes back to the dawn of time.

Different poster, but what I find debatable about the Kardashians is you can tell it’s not natural. I agree that the aesthetic is what you described but when it’s so obvious they have implants that don’t match their body, and other obvious things to their face - it just looks very unnatural to me.

I agree some people find this very attractive hence their popularity, but they’ve just never struck me as that attractive. They just all seem very fake and something looks off about all of their faces. I do Kim is the most attractive one. There is something very dead eyed about Kylie to me.

I can just think of dozens and dozens of other celebrities that I would rather look like if I had the choice than the Kardashians.

I agree that Kim is the most beautiful, but Kendall is also very attractive (and more natural looking).

But Kylie looked amazing in that sexy dress last night. Her makeup was flawless.

[Anonymous]

Below are 105 outfits from last nights event.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/the-golden-globe-for-best-dressed-on-the-red-carpet-goes-to/ar-AA1U0YQc?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=696524addac6492886d1744f66a89e82&ei=11#image=104

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Selena Gomez always knocks it out of the park at these award shows:

That’s def Ozempic