Hezbollah literally stopped firing because of peacekeepers in the vicinity while Israel tried to use them as human shields. Here's your "peacemaker". A former WH adviser no less. Another rabid Zionist "peacemaker" referring to peacekeepers: "I hope every one of those useless POS Irishmen are blasted to bits," Brodsky said on social media platform X on Saturday, October 5. https://www.irishcentral.com/news/matthew-brodsky-irish |
Well, look at that. Palestinian lives matter to my Black self, too, honey. Everyone who isn’t a liar knows that stealing Palestinian land to settle Europe wrongs was an evil deed. Stay strong. It took almost 300 years just to end slavery in America. The road might be long and arduous, but justice prevails. I believe we will see Palestinians back in your rightful place one day. |
As an American who is neither Jewish nor Muslim, I couldn’t care less about ancient history when it comes to who has dibs on the land. Rather, I care about what’s happening right now. Re: the UN approved borders - I believe borders matter. I also recognize it’s really tough to live alongside countries where terrorists dedicated to your eradication live. Seems like that might prompt you to create a buffer for your security…and perhaps overcompensate to control the border…especially if you know Iran is sneaking in trucks and weapons via big tunnels from Egypt. To be fair, I also recognize it sucks for the innocent Palestinians and Lebanese people who are caught up in this brutal war thanks to the religious extremism that fuels terrorists funded by Iran. The reality is the violence still would have happened even if Israel never expanded its borders. Terrorists aren’t motivated by borders: they just want Israel and its people gone…and they feel just as strongly about America and the West. As an American, that last bit is the piece that worries me. Moreover, I’m confused why it doesn’t concern all Americans. I’m not ride or die for Israel. I’m not anti-Palestinian. I just wish there was a way to wave a magic wand to move all religious extremists to evolve. If everyone could embrace basic human rights and religious freedom and terrorism disappeared, the Middle East might have a chance at peace. Debating ancient or even recent history or borders won’t fix the real problem. If you can’t recognize the real issue is religious extremism, then we can’t really have a productive conversation. |
MY bloodlust? Again, you can't debate for sh*t and you're a typical Zionist: Racism is all you know. Funny how you have the audacity to play pious when it comes to death and "bloodlust" AFTER Palestinians are killed which you purposely omit to then do what you just did. Why is it always you acting as though it wasn't Israeli bloodlust first? Are you that dumb you want to just start the clock last year on one day in Oct? Why choose the 7th? Tell us: Why can't we start the moment this guy showed up? Or just ignore that this was Oct *6*: 2023 marks deadliest year on record for children in the occupied West Bank. I know the above doesn't mean anything. You prefer people weep for nonexistent, beheaded Israeli babies than real, dead Palestinians babies. https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/2023-marks-deadliest-year-record-children-occupied-west-bank |
While I agree it was poor planning to plop down a bunch of Jewish people in the middle of Arab nations—and even worse to forcibly displace some—can you agree that all the billions of dollars in aid in support of building a civilized state over the last several decades could have resulted in a successful nation if only religious extremists hadn’t opted to squander the money on terrorism (I mean, the money left over once the leaders hadn’t taken millions off the top for themselves and their families who are living large far from the mess they created)? If we can both agree that both sides are in the wrong, then maybe there is hope. This shouldn’t be hard unless you have a bias. |
Jeff, Points 1, 2, and 3 don’t reflect historical facts - and this is exactly what Maher was pointing out. 1. Do you recognize the fact that Jews in Europe arrived in Europe either at the hands of Roman invaders in Judea who captured and enslaved them and in some cases brought their slaves back to Europe and/or Jews fled the Levant because they were being terrorized by Ottoman and then later, and more violently, by Islamic invaders? Jews are native to Israel - they are indigenous to the land - and were forced from it violently. The Jewish diaspora is a result of Jews being forced out of that homeland not because the average middle eastern Jew was yearning for what is now Poland or Germany. Despite the forced diaspora - which continued through the 20th century as Arab Islamist powers increasingly oppressed Jews all over the Middle East and even conspired with the Nazis in WWII, Jews never left Israel and as a community have been resilient enough to sustain a presence. There were over 600,000 Jews in Israel in 1946. This is quite different than the strawman you pose of Native Americans from the Southwest retaking Manhattan. And to this point, Uganda is not equivalent to Israel and that would have been colonialism because, unlike Israel, Jews have no historic connection to Uganda. That’s ultimately why Israel was identified as a Jewish state versus Uganda. Again, Jews are indigenous to Israel, not colonizers. 2. Also, why do you assert that “nobody was interested in Palestine” for 2,000 years. Jews have always been connected to that region - they never left that region. Religiously and in terms of historic connections, Jews have always been “interested” in that area of the Levant. Observant Jews have prayed in the direction of Jerusalem for millennia, it’s integral to Jewish identity. The line from the Passover Sedar - “next year in Jerusalem” is linked back to the 5th Century BCE. Jews have always been interested in Israel. 3. You reference Jews returning to Israel pre WWI …. You do realize that antisemitism in Russia and Eastern Europe surged at this time, right? You make it seem like Jews woke up in mid-1800s and said, hey, let’s go to Israel. That’s not factual and seems ignorant of historic facts. Lastly, denial of Jewish indigenous roots in the Middle East and specifically Israel has been part of Arab Islamist propaganda for the 50 years. This propaganda also attempts to wipe out the historical connection of Christians and other religious groups to those lands. It’s not factual - it’s propaganda - and again, part of what Maher was highlighting in his piece. Not going to even get into 4 and 5 because the false equivalence of the one Jewish state in the world trying to defend itself from Iranian terrorist proxies and the resulting war post 10/7 and the terrorist / repressive regimes that are the Iranian regime and its spinoffs of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis is not worth debating. Again, not reflective of fact, which was Maher’s point to begin with. |
Link it and summarize why. |
Whats your assessment of the Jewish Israeli, who, as part of a political party that is currently powerful in Israel who assassinated the Israeli President on the moment of the greatest peace agreement in Israel's history? What is your assessment of Israeli's who chant "Peacd with the Golan", refusing to ever return conquered territory? What is your assessment of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, who funded Hamas to promote internal Palestinian civil war to keep them weak? |
Jews weren’t just plopped into a bunch of Arab states. They were always there. But ok. This thread just proves Maher’s point. |
|
It's fascinating watching any American refer to "bloodlust" when Iraq was destroyed over that.
What was it that most Americans were saying about the ME (ignoring decades of American foreign policy of death, destruction, destroying, overthrowing, propping up) after no Iraqis had anything to do with 9/11? "Just turn it into glass." Right, some Iraqi having nothing to do with 9/11 should be killed...because that it isn't "bloodlust" |
| And what is your assessment of Israeli Prime Ministers Netanyahu's career-long "Facts on the Ground" doctrine, whose goal is to pump as many Jews as possible into as much of the occupied West Bank Palestinian territories as possible, to make lots of babies, so he can claim the land is impossible to return? |
Again you're trying to draw us into 'an eye for an eye' vengeance mindset. Exhibit A in why this conflict goes on and on. You and the far right extremists on the Israeli side don't want peace. And then you appeal to the horror you have created! You are both become demons. |
Something tells me that the anti-IraqWar people are also largely the anti-GazaWar people. Except for a chunk of the American Jews. |
It proves you are as ignorant as Maher. Israel even has a word for the campaign to plop as many people there as possible: Aliyah |
And your bias is one when you're pull the tiresome "both sides" nonsense ignoring what has been happening in the West Bank for years. You can bleat about "religious extremism" all you want, but it won't change the fact that it's violent Jewish ones responsible for what has happened in the WB and the Israeli govt encourages it |