Debatable. Low acceptance rates do equal more academic/intellectual and hard working peer cohort and better alumni connections. Which is pretty much the recipe for post grad success. |
|
Where would top tier SLACs land on this list -- Williams, Bowdoin, etc...
|
|
Northeastern is definitely top 15 at least, if not top 10. 90000 applications. Wow! Just wow.
I know there are folks who are jealous of NEU's success. But if you extrapolate their meteoric rise, I must say that they will be top 5 soon. Very very soon. Just think about. Why is iPhone rated the best? It has highest number of people who shell out hard cash to buy it. Same with universities. Students are voting with their feet and with their (parent's) wallets to go to NEU. That should count the most in any rating. You can fake everything else (like Columbia recently did). But you can't fake actual student interest which is the real deal. NEU is offering the best product out there. Few can compete. |
If I added them Fairly, Amherst would be 23 and Williams 24 or 25. |
Agreed |
Notre Dame has happier students. I think that impacts rankings, no? Also, Wall Street placement is pretty strong for ND if I recall. Also I like checking the Payscale ROI ranking, which has Notre Dame ranked at 80 and Emory at 150. https://www.payscale.com/college-roi Earning potential and graduation rate seem to be driving this...Emory with only a 90% graduation rate and ND with a 96% grad rate. I think ND students fare much better in general out in the world due to the outstanding alumni network that Emory most certainly lacks. Also, you talk about acceptance rate...which does not impact rankings. ND's acceptance rate for class of 2026 was 13%. Emory's was 19%. Not that it matters, but not sure why you even bring this up. |
Perhaps Top 15 in gaming the USNWR system. But as a school? Nope. |
Not that I want to join the pointless exercise of trying to parse out which of two very strong schools is 'better', but it was shown long ago that lifetime earnings have nothing to do with where you went to college. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871566 |
I think the payscale ranking is proof that as a whole, students who graduate from certain schools have stronger earning potential. It may not be the case for each and every student, but nothing in any of the rankings apply to all students. |
| You frigging people need more stimulus and less booze in your lives. |
Yes, students from certain schools earn more than students from other schools. But it's not BECAUSE they attended that college. It's because of who they are as a person. |
Or...it is more expensive to live in NY or Boston or DC where most elite school graduates end up living and working. |
Of course things are not exact science and math here, and better education is pretty subjective term. However Law of Supply and Demand well applies here too. Supply is fixed. Good product and good value increase demand. Here, you can also easily see the quality of the consumers, too. and it gives you a good idea about the product and th value. Is the acceptance rate high becasue of bunch of 1300 SAT kids applying or with 1500 SAT kids. |
LOL yea, and you or the other person got angry at swithcing places between Emory and ND in the arbitrary random ranking by some random person |
Did that come down from the Mountaintop? |