DP. For an NT 7 year old, and all of that, a 4 day suspension is way too long. Stop and think for a moment. A suspension is supposed to send a signal to the parent, a strong signal. A 1 or 2 day suspension sends one signal to a parent, that the child crossed a line. Engaged parents understand that signal, while checked out parents may not. A 4 day suspension is an invitation for the child to leave -- which is wrong. |
OP here: Thankfully he has an evaluation on Thursday which the school was aware of prior to this incident. |
Her post implies that 4 days is too long a suspension because her child is being evaluated and her kid claims the para is mean. I believe a 4 day suspension is warranted, period, and that she needs to stop excuse-making. |
Well, you'd be wrong about that on many levels. It sounds like this child is pretty certain to qualify for an IEP, so the school ought to have taken that into consideration before the suspension. And even for an NT 7 year old, 4 days would be too long. You're looking at this from a punitive perspective, not from a perspective of what's actually going to HELP the child. It's ok, it's very common for people to just want to punish. Parents facing behavioral issues like OP (and me, in the past) quickly learn how to weed out you Masked Avenger types. If you'd actually like to learn and engage instead of being punitive, here's some information for you: https://www.pbis.org/evaluation/evaluation-briefs/suspensions-and-future |
+1 4 days is really long suspension for such a young kid and a kick. I would appeal, particularly because it sounds like the substitute exacerbated the issue (no one should mock a child like that). |
+1 How horrible to taunt a child. |
| Ironically OP, this 4-day suspension could actually end up helping you get an IEP. One key factor in determining IEP eligibility is if the disability results in being unable to access the curriculum. Assuming his behavior stems from ADHD, this suspension is proof positive that it's keeping him from being able to access the curriculum. That's the argument I would make, anyway. |
Are you absolutely sure this happened? Was it witnessed, or just your sons reporting? |
I have a child with severe ADHD. I never allowed that to be an excuse for harming another person. Especially a teacher. |
Whoa. Slow down. I did not read OP's post as "excusing" her kid's behavior but rather explaining it. Those are 2 different things. My sense is that OP does not excuse the behavior but is wondering whether this suspension is an appropriate response given all the circumstances that led to it. Based on what's been shared, my answer is no. I'd want to know what other issues have occurred. Has there been progressive discipline? What is the thinking around 4 days? Why not fewer days? Why not in-school suspension? |
| For what it's worth, your son sounds just like mine in how he reacts. Mine would feel as though the had been accused of something he didn't think he had done, wouldn't want to accept the consequence, would run away and/or become aggressive (fight or flight mentality). Luckily he is in a good program, where the emphasis is on supporting him rather than punishing him (so suspensions have not been as long). He has ADHD and anxiety, and it is the anxiety that caused him to act out so much when his impulsive behavior gets him in trouble. Once we started to treat him for anxiety, things started to get better. |
Where do you get the picture that she is excusing her child? Like it or not, behavior is in interaction with the environment. If punishing, yelling, suspending, reporting, were all that it took to get "good" behavior, there would be no behavioral problems. OP is describing what's happened (to the best of her knowledge) and looking for solutions. She is doing the right thing. |
I hate to say this but I kind of agree. I have the utmpst empathy for those of you with SN kids and the struggles you face. My DD is in K though and has been pushed, hit and choked by 2 different kids with autism. I know those kids cant help it and I have tried to tell DD that but the fact remains she should not have to be at school with the threat of bodily harm from other students. I think the mainstreaming of SN kids has gone too far. I dont understand why there cant be smaller classes with special educators and have all the SN kids in one class learning what they need to learn at their own pace. |
OP's description makes very clear where she is reporting what her son told her, what she knows, and what she doesn't know. What you're implying is that her son is lying and she's believing him. I don't see anything here to indicate that. |
Go away from the SN board, please. |