Women making over 200k

[Anonymous]

41 big 4 accounting firm

[Anonymous]

33 medical sales

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The question should be, how old are you, what is your job, and have you ever been to a fertility doctor.

34. Lawyer. No fertility doctor. I have children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The question should be, how old are you, what is your job, and have you ever been to a fertility doctor.

but i guess income would be interesting if people cared to share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:39 vp policy nonprofit

That's criminal. Never going to donate to a nonprofit again

You are a total moron. You realize there are lots of types of organizations that fall under the heading of nonprofit right? All will be glad to take your money but many are not 'charities' per se. The concept that a huge policy think tank and your local animal shelter are the same thing because they are "nonprofits" is ridiculous. Cutting off funding to your favorite charities because of another organization's structure is odd.

Also, please remember that this person could possibly easily be making $500K or more in a private sector position that is on the same level (or worse, would be actually LESS work). The idea that large NGOs shouldn't be able to attract top talent with salaries is ridiculous. Some people don't believe that salaries should be comparable between private and public sector. OK fine, even if that is the case there is this sentiment of outrage when executives that run global NPOs that are the same size as many corporate counterparts make even anything resembling modest salaries. Remember these are the same people who could be making millions in bonuses but choose to work in this sector for literally 10% or less of their "market value". But by all means, we should never pay them more than 80K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:39 vp policy nonprofit

That's criminal. Never going to donate to a nonprofit again

We are not the kind that takes donations from people only companies

[Anonymous]

28 prostitute

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:28 prostitute

How much do u make? how much do u work?

[Anonymous]

32, physician, 1 infant

[Anonymous]

38, finance, 500k.

[Anonymous]

39, marketing for a consultancy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:39 vp policy nonprofit

That's criminal. Never going to donate to a nonprofit again

You are a total moron. You realize there are lots of types of organizations that fall under the heading of nonprofit right? All will be glad to take your money but many are not 'charities' per se. The concept that a huge policy think tank and your local animal shelter are the same thing because they are "nonprofits" is ridiculous. Cutting off funding to your favorite charities because of another organization's structure is odd.

Also, please remember that this person could possibly easily be making $500K or more in a private sector position that is on the same level (or worse, would be actually LESS work). The idea that large NGOs shouldn't be able to attract top talent with salaries is ridiculous. Some people don't believe that salaries should be comparable between private and public sector. OK fine, even if that is the case there is this sentiment of outrage when executives that run global NPOs that are the same size as many corporate counterparts make even anything resembling modest salaries. Remember these are the same people who could be making millions in bonuses but choose to work in this sector for literally 10% or less of their "market value". But by all means, we should never pay them more than 80K.

I don't agree with either salary (private or non profit). With private the board of investors votes in salaries with non profits it's the doners who should have a say.

[Anonymous]

The ones I know are either consultants or BigLaw (mid 30s).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:39 vp policy nonprofit

That's criminal. Never going to donate to a nonprofit again

You are a total moron. You realize there are lots of types of organizations that fall under the heading of nonprofit right? All will be glad to take your money but many are not 'charities' per se. The concept that a huge policy think tank and your local animal shelter are the same thing because they are "nonprofits" is ridiculous. Cutting off funding to your favorite charities because of another organization's structure is odd.

Also, please remember that this person could possibly easily be making $500K or more in a private sector position that is on the same level (or worse, would be actually LESS work). The idea that large NGOs shouldn't be able to attract top talent with salaries is ridiculous. Some people don't believe that salaries should be comparable between private and public sector. OK fine, even if that is the case there is this sentiment of outrage when executives that run global NPOs that are the same size as many corporate counterparts make even anything resembling modest salaries. Remember these are the same people who could be making millions in bonuses but choose to work in this sector for literally 10% or less of their "market value". But by all means, we should never pay them more than 80K.

Pp here. I have worked for a lot of nonprofits, mostly as an unpaid intern. They at e highly exploitive. They act like they are doing good when their structure is such that the people at the to make tons and then they have fellows making a nonlivable stipend and then a bunch of unpaid interns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:39 vp policy nonprofit

That's criminal. Never going to donate to a nonprofit again

You are a total moron. You realize there are lots of types of organizations that fall under the heading of nonprofit right? All will be glad to take your money but many are not 'charities' per se. The concept that a huge policy think tank and your local animal shelter are the same thing because they are "nonprofits" is ridiculous. Cutting off funding to your favorite charities because of another organization's structure is odd.

Also, please remember that this person could possibly easily be making $500K or more in a private sector position that is on the same level (or worse, would be actually LESS work). The idea that large NGOs shouldn't be able to attract top talent with salaries is ridiculous. Some people don't believe that salaries should be comparable between private and public sector. OK fine, even if that is the case there is this sentiment of outrage when executives that run global NPOs that are the same size as many corporate counterparts make even anything resembling modest salaries. Remember these are the same people who could be making millions in bonuses but choose to work in this sector for literally 10% or less of their "market value". But by all means, we should never pay them more than 80K.

+1 It makes sense to pay someone to do the job who actually knows what they are doing. Sure, you have less fees going to administration, but your "additional money" going to the charity never gets put to as good of use because it's not utilized as efficiently.