I think this as well. Like, if you take the kids on his time, he should have to pay you some sort of babysitter fee. Asking for 50 50 when you know you can't do it is just an attempt to escape paying full child support. |
that's too vague. I would do an hourly daytime rate, an over night, and put in a. clause where it adjusts for inflation. |
No, they don’t even want to see him and have to be forced to comply with the current visitation. He doesn’t keep food in the house and they don’t have anything to do over there; he sends work emails while they basically wait to be driven back to my house. They try to save their homework for visitation so they have something to do, so they’re at least productive. But I don’t expect that he would fold at the last minute for the sake of what they wanted, and they are too young to get much of a say. |
Based on our current imputed income calculations (and this is just projections), child support/expense calculations will be based on him making 20x my income. So hopefully that would bring my share of a nanny/driver down quite significantly if I can negotiate that down. Otherwise my income once I am working full-time again will be less than what a full-time nanny or driver would earn so an allocation of that expense based on usage would be challenging for me. |
You may want to get a really good GAL involved and therapy for kids. Ex only gave up because GAL talked to kids and the therapist and they had a pattern of refusing to get into the car and he couldn’t physically force them. They were only 11. He gave it all up for a sweeter monetary deal. |
I have an excellent therapist, but unfortunately DH hired a private custody evaluator. It will be a while before we get the recommendation but they seem very enamored with DH and his provider role. A GAL is the next option if the recommendation is really unrealistic and we have to go to court. I don’t recommend that anyone go down this kind of legal path if they have the choice. I did not.
|
|
If HE hired the private evaluator without consulting you, you absolutely do not have to agree to be interviewed or to allowing HIS evaluator to interview your children. DO NOT participate under any circumstance. Put your objection to this private evaluation in writing ASAP!!!
WHAT ON EARTH do you mean by “it will be awhile before we get the recommendation” ?!? Who gives a flying f what a shill paid for by your stbx thinks is best for your kids. |
| Op, what state are you in? |
You may have a good therapist, but he clearly has a better lawyer than you do. I would start doing some consults with the known pit-bull lawyers in your county. |
Agreed. Do you even have a legally binding temporary visitation agreement? I did not agree with the court evaluator and hired, in agreement with ex and his attorney, a GAL. We split the costs. The GAL saw things vastly differently. |
| I’d go to trial and let a judge decide. He won’t get 50/50 with those work travel demands. |
It’s not that simple. Yes, he hired them, but yes, I also had to agree. While legally you can refuse to participate in a custody evaluation, the consequence is typically that the opposing party will go straight to scheduling a hearing for custody. And depending on the jurisdiction, refusing to participate in an evaluation will be deemed by a judge to be non-cooperative and will impact custody outcomes. Or the judge could then appoint a court-mandated evaluator, which triggers a very different process. You have to know your county and their expectations; mine is in a mediation-required state and focuses very much on “cooperation”, and if I had not signed off on the evaluation I would have been screwed. That’s why my STBX’s attorney deployed it as a tactic. But…the judge does not have to accept the custody evaluator’s recommendation. It’s not legally binding, it’s just used as a tool for leverage during custody hearings. So now my focus is on ensuring that we have sufficient documentation of both the flawed evaluation process and my STbX’s actual behavior to make sure the judge has an accurate perspective to determine what is in the bests interests of our children. |
| PS to clarify: if the judge had appointed a court-mandated custody evaluator, their recommendation would be binding. Down to the minute they decided exchanges should happen and the holiday schedule they choose. Which is why that was to be avoided at all costs. |
Actually, it sounds to me like you angling to maximize child support. |
That’s not how child support works. |