American Hustlers: Meghan and Harry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

I'm not going to read this article, but these paragraphs are insane. Translation:

Meghan was really nice to, oh let's call her Anon, until Anon royally screwed something up. And then she was not quite as nice, but Anon was insanely jealous of the attention that non screwups got. And Meghan, like many other bosses the world over, has an awareness of her employees, their performance, presumably their presence, which Anon perceives as calculating and cold, and also bullying.

Also, Meghan yells without raising her voice (pretty sure that's a U2 lyric) but it's like being screamed it.

Anon sounds insane.

But anon represents so many individuals in several locations around the world who had the same experience with M. The exact experience.

[Anonymous]

Meghan was outshining Kate. And that family is profoundly dysfunctional. So happy for them that they escaped.

[Anonymous]

Follow the money. No coincidence this came out right before Harry's trial. You people are a bunch of rubes who fall for it every single time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

I'm not going to read this article, but these paragraphs are insane. Translation:

Meghan was really nice to, oh let's call her Anon, until Anon royally screwed something up. And then she was not quite as nice, but Anon was insanely jealous of the attention that non screwups got. And Meghan, like many other bosses the world over, has an awareness of her employees, their performance, presumably their presence, which Anon perceives as calculating and cold, and also bullying.

Also, Meghan yells without raising her voice (pretty sure that's a U2 lyric) but it's like being screamed it.

Anon sounds insane.

But anon represents so many individuals in several locations around the world who had the same experience with M. The exact experience.

Who never go on record, ever. Isn't that just so convenient. No one has ever gone on the record against her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Follow the money. No coincidence this came out right before Harry's trial. You people are a bunch of rubes who fall for it every single time.

This crossed my mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan haters: I wish they would go away!!!!
Also Meghan haters: yes I have plenty of time to read a 30 page article about the people I hate.

Harry and Meghan: We are leaving royal life for our privacy and our family. Leave us alone!
Also Harry and Meghan: Have you seen my tell all…Netflix Special, Oprah interview, book or bought some of my jam, seen my kids on the cover of People and watched “With Love, Meghan”” (oh the irony)

They never said it was about privacy. They wanted to be free of the Royal Rota. You would too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

Look, no one likes when their boss is upset with them, but releasing that teaser FIVE MONTHS early does indeed seem like a massive screw up that was probably not Megan's fault. So someone else did it, but it's Megan who gets dragged in the press for it, and she's mad at the people on staff she perceives as being responsible for that massive mistake.

This is not the reveal you seem to think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

I'm not going to read this article, but these paragraphs are insane. Translation:

Meghan was really nice to, oh let's call her Anon, until Anon royally screwed something up. And then she was not quite as nice, but Anon was insanely jealous of the attention that non screwups got. And Meghan, like many other bosses the world over, has an awareness of her employees, their performance, presumably their presence, which Anon perceives as calculating and cold, and also bullying.

Also, Meghan yells without raising her voice (pretty sure that's a U2 lyric) but it's like being screamed it.

Anon sounds insane.

But anon represents so many individuals in several locations around the world who had the same experience with M. The exact experience.

Who never go on record, ever. Isn't that just so convenient. No one has ever gone on the record against her.

It is very typically Vanity Fair to have a 30-page "in depth tell all" in which no one dishing dirt actually goes on record but they get a lot of gossip columnists and bloggers to weigh in on their opinions (which are already freely available in their columns and blogs).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

I'm not going to read this article, but these paragraphs are insane. Translation:

Meghan was really nice to, oh let's call her Anon, until Anon royally screwed something up. And then she was not quite as nice, but Anon was insanely jealous of the attention that non screwups got. And Meghan, like many other bosses the world over, has an awareness of her employees, their performance, presumably their presence, which Anon perceives as calculating and cold, and also bullying.

Also, Meghan yells without raising her voice (pretty sure that's a U2 lyric) but it's like being screamed it.

Anon sounds insane.

But anon represents so many individuals in several locations around the world who had the same experience with M. The exact experience.

Who never go on record, ever. Isn't that just so convenient. No one has ever gone on the record against her.

It is very typically Vanity Fair to have a 30-page "in depth tell all" in which no one dishing dirt actually goes on record but they get a lot of gossip columnists and bloggers to weigh in on their opinions (which are already freely available in their columns and blogs).

But for all that talk of changing the world and help people what is she doing now? A fluffy lifestyle show about elevating cheese and crackers or some shit. Who is that helping?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

I'm not going to read this article, but these paragraphs are insane. Translation:

Meghan was really nice to, oh let's call her Anon, until Anon royally screwed something up. And then she was not quite as nice, but Anon was insanely jealous of the attention that non screwups got. And Meghan, like many other bosses the world over, has an awareness of her employees, their performance, presumably their presence, which Anon perceives as calculating and cold, and also bullying.

Also, Meghan yells without raising her voice (pretty sure that's a U2 lyric) but it's like being screamed it.

Anon sounds insane.

But anon represents so many individuals in several locations around the world who had the same experience with M. The exact experience.

I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

Look, no one likes when their boss is upset with them, but releasing that teaser FIVE MONTHS early does indeed seem like a massive screw up that was probably not Megan's fault. So someone else did it, but it's Megan who gets dragged in the press for it, and she's mad at the people on staff she perceives as being responsible for that massive mistake.

This is not the reveal you seem to think it is.

My read is that it is as harry and Meghan who insisted the teaser be released fivel months early.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Its a long article but I thought this was interesting:
The source who worked in media projects says Meghan’s own relationships with employees tended to follow a familiar pattern. She would be warm and effusive at the beginning, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie. When something went poorly, often due to Meghan and Harry’s own demands—such as a teaser for Archetypes being released five months before the show premiered and before there was any tape to promote—Meghan would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible. The source says it was “really, really, really awful. Very painful. Because she’s constantly playing checkers—I’m not even going to say chess—but she’s just very aware of where everybody is on her board. And when you are not in, you are to be thrown to the wolves at any given moment.” In practice, they say, that manifested as “undermining. It’s talking behind your back. It’s gnawing at your sense of self. Really, like, Mean Girls teenager.” Marie had a different experience with Meghan: “She’s just a lovely, genuine person,” she said.

The person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan “bullying” palace aides and couldn’t imagine such behavior actually happened. After working with her, though, this person realized, “Oh, any given Tuesday this happened.” While it beggars belief that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says, “You can be yelled at even if somebody doesn’t raise their voice. [It’s] funny that people don’t differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally somebody screaming at you.”

I'm not going to read this article, but these paragraphs are insane. Translation:

Meghan was really nice to, oh let's call her Anon, until Anon royally screwed something up. And then she was not quite as nice, but Anon was insanely jealous of the attention that non screwups got. And Meghan, like many other bosses the world over, has an awareness of her employees, their performance, presumably their presence, which Anon perceives as calculating and cold, and also bullying.

Also, Meghan yells without raising her voice (pretty sure that's a U2 lyric) but it's like being screamed it.

Anon sounds insane.

Guest speaker chill out!

[Anonymous]

The VF article confirms the bullying allegations and these were also reported on by the Times and the Hollywood Reporter… lots of credible sources that she’s an absolute witch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan haters: I wish they would go away!!!!
Also Meghan haters: yes I have plenty of time to read a 30 page article about the people I hate.

Harry and Meghan: We are leaving royal life for our privacy and our family. Leave us alone!
Also Harry and Meghan: Have you seen my tell all…Netflix Special, Oprah interview, book or bought some of my jam, seen my kids on the cover of People and watched “With Love, Meghan”” (oh the irony)

They never said it was about privacy. They wanted to be free of the Royal Rota. You would too.

Don't be obtuse. They said they wanted to be out of the newspapers and "avoid scrutiny." Except for when they want publicity for their jam, Netflix and books - then they want press and coverage. But they only want positive press. That's not the way it works. As the Netflix Exec who worked with them said, "they're grifters."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Follow the money. No coincidence this came out right before Harry's trial. You people are a bunch of rubes who fall for it every single time.

Said someone who evidentially has never read Vanity Fair before. Do you know how liberal Vanity Fair is? You think they are in cahoots with Rupert Murdock? Take off your tinfoil hat and stop embarrassing yourself.