Why didn’t Kamala go on the Joe Rogan podcast?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harris is not good at unscripted discussions, hence the desire for a truncated one-hour interview and questions about edits. The campaign also wanted to control the interviews by having them on their turf, where they would have more control over lighting, wiring, editing. You don't have to worry about the latter if you have a candidate who converses well.

But why? Rogan isn’t Ted Koppell or Bill O Reilly. He is not a hard news guy. He just wanted to get to know her and talk about life. The same thing he did with Trump. Policy would’ve only been a side note.

He wasn’t going to ask her gotcha questions. He also changed his politics and positions on things and if Kamala explained why she changed her position on things once she received new info (the same thing Trump said), she would’ve came off as more human and relatable. The fact that Trump admitted to mistakes but Kamala didn’t is the biggest surprise to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is not good at unscripted discussions, hence the desire for a truncated one-hour interview and questions about edits. The campaign also wanted to control the interviews by having them on their turf, where they would have more control over lighting, wiring, editing. You don't have to worry about the latter if you have a candidate who converses well.

But why? Rogan isn’t Ted Koppell or Bill O Reilly. He is not a hard news guy. He just wanted to get to know her and talk about life. The same thing he did with Trump. Policy would’ve only been a side note.

He wasn’t going to ask her gotcha questions. He also changed his politics and positions on things and if Kamala explained why she changed her position on things once she received new info (the same thing Trump said), she would’ve came off as more human and relatable. The fact that Trump admitted to mistakes but Kamala didn’t is the biggest surprise to me.

You keep posting this over and over again. Don’t you have anything better to do with your time?

BTW - love his mistake. “I hired swamp monsters.” And you praised him, rather than realize that meant he broke his biggest campaign promise. So gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is not good at unscripted discussions, hence the desire for a truncated one-hour interview and questions about edits. The campaign also wanted to control the interviews by having them on their turf, where they would have more control over lighting, wiring, editing. You don't have to worry about the latter if you have a candidate who converses well.

But why? Rogan isn’t Ted Koppell or Bill O Reilly. He is not a hard news guy. He just wanted to get to know her and talk about life. The same thing he did with Trump. Policy would’ve only been a side note.

He wasn’t going to ask her gotcha questions. He also changed his politics and positions on things and if Kamala explained why she changed her position on things once she received new info (the same thing Trump said), she would’ve came off as more human and relatable. The fact that Trump admitted to mistakes but Kamala didn’t is the biggest surprise to me.

It was out of her comfort zone. She thought she could win without leaving it.

Trump going on Schulz’ podcast was a watershed moment in the campaign. It showed that he was willing to risk being made a fool to win over new voters.

I’m not sure Biden’s camp believed that he could actually lose the election until the debate.

I’m not sure Kamala’s camp believed that she could actually lose the election until she actually lost it.

Complacency will get you every time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not vote for anyone claiming to be a serious contender for the leader of the free world who thought it would be a good idea to appear on 'Call Her Daddy'.

And yet you voted for a pussy grabber. Make it make sense. Oh, there’s a word for it…misogyny. Creating double standards.

Nope, I did not, actually. But there ‘your side’ goes again, screeching that anyone who didn’t vote for a woman is a misogynist, hates themselves, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not vote for anyone claiming to be a serious contender for the leader of the free world who thought it would be a good idea to appear on 'Call Her Daddy'.

And yet you voted for a pussy grabber. Make it make sense. Oh, there’s a word for it…misogyny. Creating double standards.

Nope, I did not, actually. But there ‘your side’ goes again, screeching that anyone who didn’t vote for a woman is a misogynist, hates themselves, etc.

It’s voting for a rapist that makes a person a misogynist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is not good at unscripted discussions, hence the desire for a truncated one-hour interview and questions about edits. The campaign also wanted to control the interviews by having them on their turf, where they would have more control over lighting, wiring, editing. You don't have to worry about the latter if you have a candidate who converses well.

But why? Rogan isn’t Ted Koppell or Bill O Reilly. He is not a hard news guy. He just wanted to get to know her and talk about life. The same thing he did with Trump. Policy would’ve only been a side note.

He wasn’t going to ask her gotcha questions. He also changed his politics and positions on things and if Kamala explained why she changed her position on things once she received new info (the same thing Trump said), she would’ve came off as more human and relatable. The fact that Trump admitted to mistakes but Kamala didn’t is the biggest surprise to me.

Excellent question. The interview would have helped her a lot with the demographic audience she needed. However, the fear was likely that she might not be able to do even a personal conversation without making a gaffe.

[Anonymous]

She absolutely did not lose by very small margins- where have you been the last week?

Also this wouldn’t have made any difference but Rogan was free, Beyoncé was not 🤷‍♂️

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

No anyone who listens to Rogan is a hardcore maga.

Clearly you don’t know his audience- go look on the Rogan subreddit - they are most certainly not hardcore maga

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is not good at unscripted discussions, hence the desire for a truncated one-hour interview and questions about edits. The campaign also wanted to control the interviews by having them on their turf, where they would have more control over lighting, wiring, editing. You don't have to worry about the latter if you have a candidate who converses well.

But why? Rogan isn’t Ted Koppell or Bill O Reilly. He is not a hard news guy. He just wanted to get to know her and talk about life. The same thing he did with Trump. Policy would’ve only been a side note.

He wasn’t going to ask her gotcha questions. He also changed his politics and positions on things and if Kamala explained why she changed her position on things once she received new info (the same thing Trump said), she would’ve came off as more human and relatable. The fact that Trump admitted to mistakes but Kamala didn’t is the biggest surprise to me.

You keep posting this over and over again. Don’t you have anything better to do with your time?

BTW - love his mistake. “I hired swamp monsters.” And you praised him, rather than realize that meant he broke his biggest campaign promise. So gullible.

Don’t you have anything better to do with your time? Why are you here if you don’t like the discussion matter?

I don’t understand why Kamala would go on the Call her Daddy podcast but not Joe Rogan. Trump stole the Rogan idea from Kamala. Why was she so afraid to answer questions? If she’s afraid of Rogan, imagine Kamala facing Putin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is not good at unscripted discussions, hence the desire for a truncated one-hour interview and questions about edits. The campaign also wanted to control the interviews by having them on their turf, where they would have more control over lighting, wiring, editing. You don't have to worry about the latter if you have a candidate who converses well.

But why? Rogan isn’t Ted Koppell or Bill O Reilly. He is not a hard news guy. He just wanted to get to know her and talk about life. The same thing he did with Trump. Policy would’ve only been a side note.

He wasn’t going to ask her gotcha questions. He also changed his politics and positions on things and if Kamala explained why she changed her position on things once she received new info (the same thing Trump said), she would’ve came off as more human and relatable. The fact that Trump admitted to mistakes but Kamala didn’t is the biggest surprise to me.

It was out of her comfort zone. She thought she could win without leaving it.

Trump going on Schulz’ podcast was a watershed moment in the campaign. It showed that he was willing to risk being made a fool to win over new voters.

I’m not sure Biden’s camp believed that he could actually lose the election until the debate.

I’m not sure Kamala’s camp believed that she could actually lose the election until she actually lost it.

Complacency will get you every time.

What is so out of a comfort zone about answering a UFC commentator/ wrestler’s questions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

No anyone who listens to Rogan is a hardcore maga.

Clearly you don’t know his audience- go look on the Rogan subreddit - they are most certainly not hardcore maga

Rogan supports same-sex marriage, gay rights, recreational drug legalization, universal health care, universal basic income, gun rights, and free speech, while criticizing cancel culture and military adventurism. He has expressed political opinions, such as supporting Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.

Bernie Sanders supports all of his stances. Trump asked Rogan for his endorsement mid interview and Rogan didn’t give in till a week later when the negotiations with Kamala went up in flames.

Imagine Kamala mediating peace or negotiations in the Middle East. Obviously, she does not have the skill set. Perhaps she should’ve read one of our most storied Western philosopher’s work, The Art of the Deal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

You mean, “Why Didn’t Harris go on the Joe Rogan Podcast?”

[Anonymous]

GMAFB….i’ve listened to Rogan’s podcast and I vote blue. He has had a few interesting guests on including Eddie Izzard, who is transgender.

I really really wish dems would stop with the purity garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This was something of a tortoise and the hare situation.

Harris won the debate, thought she had the election in the bag, and avoided anything that carried the least bit of risk. She avoided any real interviews for weeks after the debate and then did only super friendly mainstream stuff in the final month.

Trump lose the debate and knew he had to do something unconventional to win. So he did three hours of Rogan and even spent an hour with Andrew Schulz, who was certainly not a friendly audience. The new media appearances garnered tens of millions of views and may well have turned the election.

What are you talking about? She had an interview with Fox News in October. Remember when Trump went on CNN or MSNBC? I sure don't (unless you count the CNN town hall that was packed with a MAGA audience, back in 2023 before he was even the nominee).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

She's stupid, lazy, and was a terrible candidate. You idiots tried to install her. Keep your denial up at your own peril. It's very satisfying.