Why didn’t Kamala go on the Joe Rogan podcast?

[Anonymous]

Why didn’t Trump do a second debate? He was scared because he performed badly in the first one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t Trump do a second debate? He was scared because he performed badly in the first one.

Well, according to him the fact that she wanted a second debate means she botched the first one and wants a do-over. He's lying of course, but his supporters believe him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would not vote for anyone claiming to be a serious contender for the leader of the free world who thought it would be a good idea to appear on 'Call Her Daddy'.

This is a very good point

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t Trump do a second debate? He was scared because he performed badly in the first one.

Well, according to him the fact that she wanted a second debate means she botched the first one and wants a do-over. He's lying of course, but his supporters believe him.

Did you watch it? It was obvious that she had known the questions in advance and the moderators were clearly favoring her and against him.

[Anonymous]

Why didn’t Trump go on Call Her Daddy? Ffs it’s a podcast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? Trump got the same vote as he got in 2020. She needed the moderates to come out but they did not. Going on Rogan would not get a single vote.

PoI:

Trump got over 4% more in 2024 than 2020.

~77.5M vs 74.2M

[Anonymous]

It doesn't matter. It never did.
The people who didn't want to vote for her were never going to and he couldn't lose a vote if he tried.

[Anonymous]

Kamala Harris agreed to go on his podcast, with the same terms she used for every other interview. Rogan didn't want to go along with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not vote for anyone claiming to be a serious contender for the leader of the free world who thought it would be a good idea to appear on 'Call Her Daddy'.

This is a very good point

Yes, the "I could never vote for" crowd.
Well there is a list a mile long that Trump did, but somehow, with the grace of God, you sure voted for him. So spare me the "She lost me at" BS.
She lost you at not being a narcistic man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

She's stupid, lazy, and was a terrible candidate. You idiots tried to install her. Keep your denial up at your own peril. It's very satisfying.

Ah, you wish. This election hasn't been as satisfying as you expected, or you wouldn't be running after people with a can of salt.

Dems are just over it. This one was going to go this way whatever anyone did, so fair enough. Now it's on you to fix everything, so have at it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter. It never did.
The people who didn't want to vote for her were never going to and he couldn't lose a vote if he tried.

Precisely.

No point in getting angsty over it now. This is just how it is in America 2024.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was something of a tortoise and the hare situation.

Harris won the debate, thought she had the election in the bag, and avoided anything that carried the least bit of risk. She avoided any real interviews for weeks after the debate and then did only super friendly mainstream stuff in the final month.

Trump lose the debate and knew he had to do something unconventional to win. So he did three hours of Rogan and even spent an hour with Andrew Schulz, who was certainly not a friendly audience. The new media appearances garnered tens of millions of views and may well have turned the election.

What are you talking about? She had an interview with Fox News in October. Remember when Trump went on CNN or MSNBC? I sure don't (unless you count the CNN town hall that was packed with a MAGA audience, back in 2023 before he was even the nominee).

She deserves some credit for going on Fox, but one interview does not a strategy make.

Kamala campaigned like it was 1998. Trump beat Hillary by using analytics to his advantage and beat Kamala by leveraging new media.

But new media ain’t exactly new. That her campaign wasn’t on top of it is a bit shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was something of a tortoise and the hare situation.

Harris won the debate, thought she had the election in the bag, and avoided anything that carried the least bit of risk. She avoided any real interviews for weeks after the debate and then did only super friendly mainstream stuff in the final month.

Trump lose the debate and knew he had to do something unconventional to win. So he did three hours of Rogan and even spent an hour with Andrew Schulz, who was certainly not a friendly audience. The new media appearances garnered tens of millions of views and may well have turned the election.

What are you talking about? She had an interview with Fox News in October. Remember when Trump went on CNN or MSNBC? I sure don't (unless you count the CNN town hall that was packed with a MAGA audience, back in 2023 before he was even the nominee).

She deserves some credit for going on Fox, but one interview does not a strategy make.

Kamala campaigned like it was 1998. Trump beat Hillary by using analytics to his advantage and beat Kamala by leveraging new media.

But new media ain’t exactly new. That her campaign wasn’t on top of it is a bit shocking.

YAWN.
WHo cares. It never did. She could have a chair on Fox every night and 'it isn't enough' crowd will still blather on that 'it isn't enough' or 'if she only'.
This was baked in the cake already. Who cares now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t Trump do a second debate? He was scared because he performed badly in the first one.

Well, according to him the fact that she wanted a second debate means she botched the first one and wants a do-over. He's lying of course, but his supporters believe him.

Did you watch it? It was obvious that she had known the questions in advance and the moderators were clearly favoring her and against him.

Yes, I did watch it. He doubled down on the Haitian immigrants eating the pets and said babies are being executed after birth. He's an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This was something of a tortoise and the hare situation.

Harris won the debate, thought she had the election in the bag, and avoided anything that carried the least bit of risk. She avoided any real interviews for weeks after the debate and then did only super friendly mainstream stuff in the final month.

Trump lose the debate and knew he had to do something unconventional to win. So he did three hours of Rogan and even spent an hour with Andrew Schulz, who was certainly not a friendly audience. The new media appearances garnered tens of millions of views and may well have turned the election.

Debates should never be viewed that way. There is no winning a debate. It’s subjective.