Why didn’t Kamala go on the Joe Rogan podcast?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

No anyone who listens to Rogan is a hardcore maga.

Have you ever listened to Rogan, in full? Not snippets. He wanted a free form conversation with Kamala, her handlers refused. She is not capable enough to handle a free form interview without teleprompters or in ear communication. So many talented Democrats could have been viable options, yet she was the chosen one. Exceptionally poor plan by the democrat handlers. Glad it blew up in their faces.

I am not glad in blew up in their faces because I think we’re all in for a disastrous four years but you are not wrong about Rogan. Her handlers acted like it was this unreasonable thing that he wanted three whole hours with her but literally all his interviews are like that. It was a huge mistake that she and Walz as well did not do that podcast.

He didn't just want three whole hours - he wanted her there in-person in Austin, TX - a place not particularly close to DC or the states where she was focusing.

A place where no one else had difficulty going. She didn't want to go on his podcast; it wasn't logistics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rogan would never have a black woman on his show. He would lose all his viewers.

Once again shows how UTTERLY STUPID and out of touch Democrats are.

I suggest you watch the Ms. Pat episode. Rogan has hundreds of episodes and has interviewed pretty much everyone of every race and gender. Dems are so far behind on the times and don't realize he is a modern day media powerhouse more than the news and interviews everyone fairly.

You clowns think he is some RWNJ. He supported Bernie Sanders for Christ's sake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rogan would never have a black woman on his show. He would lose all his viewers.

Once again shows how UTTERLY STUPID and out of touch Democrats are.

I suggest you watch the Ms. Pat episode. Rogan has hundreds of episodes and has interviewed pretty much everyone of every race and gender. Dems are so far behind on the times and don't realize he is a modern day media powerhouse more than the news and interviews everyone fairly.

You clowns think he is some RWNJ. He supported Bernie Sanders for Christ's sake.

Sure. He endorsed Trump. He is a RWNJ x 5. He does not believe the US landed in the moon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump shoots from the hip and his supporters have already said they don't care about his gaffes and lies and derogatory words. Kamala is someone who has a harder time speaking impromptu and she would be scrutinized relentlessly plus the audience would be mostly male and confrontational towards whatever she said.

Shouldn’t someone who wants to be President figure out how to take it and now cower in fear?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump shoots from the hip and his supporters have already said they don't care about his gaffes and lies and derogatory words. Kamala is someone who has a harder time speaking impromptu and she would be scrutinized relentlessly plus the audience would be mostly male and confrontational towards whatever she said.

Shouldn’t someone who wants to be President figure out how to take it and now cower in fear?

Dems have to be afraid of conservatives and their own party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine Kamala doing a three hour unscripted, unedited interview? Nope and neither could her campaign handlers. Her idiocy and ultra-left agenda would have been front and center. She would not have been able to give detailed answers to any questions especially on her ever-changing “policies”. It would have been word salad after word salad. We would have been unburdened by what has been.

This is truth. No one could imagine her doing such an interview like that with anyone. And worse still is that her people didn’t even havr faith in her.

[Anonymous]

I love podcasts and listen to a lot of them. But I don't elevate any of the podcasters I listen to to the position that Rogan has been elevated to. I just want information--I'm not looking for someone to inspire me or to fill some emotional gap in my life.

At the end of the day, podcasters are in it to make money. And Joe Rogan is probably the wealthiest of them all: "Joe Rogan has a net worth of over $200 million, as of 2024. He earns over $100,000 for one episode. On average, he does 3 podcast episodes weekly, making $1.2 million a month and $14.4 million a year."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rogan endorsed Sanders over Clinton and became an enemy of the state (to democrats).

That's Trump language not Democrats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t Trump do a second debate? He was scared because he performed badly in the first one.

Because he didn’t need to., so why would he? But she did need to go on more podcasts with a wider audience.

It wouldn't matter. America hates women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump shoots from the hip and his supporters have already said they don't care about his gaffes and lies and derogatory words. Kamala is someone who has a harder time speaking impromptu and she would be scrutinized relentlessly plus the audience would be mostly male and confrontational towards whatever she said.

Shouldn’t someone who wants to be President figure out how to take it and now cower in fear?

You ... you know the election is over, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump shoots from the hip and his supporters have already said they don't care about his gaffes and lies and derogatory words. Kamala is someone who has a harder time speaking impromptu and she would be scrutinized relentlessly plus the audience would be mostly male and confrontational towards whatever she said.

Shouldn’t someone who wants to be President figure out how to take it and now cower in fear?

Dems have to be afraid of conservatives and their own party.

Oaky

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone go on his show? It’s so sad that he’s so popular. So low brow.

It is sad that this is where the young and old in this country turn to. Have failed those kids.

Where should they turn, MSNBC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What went wrong? Their camps were in negotiations for weeks but Kamala didn’t want to go to Austin to do the show.

What’s her big problem with traveling? She also didn’t want to go travel to the studio for the Call her Daddy podcast.

Given she lost by very small margins in a few Blue Wall states, don’t you think a podcast with Joe would’ve helped her just a bit with young voters?

No anyone who listens to Rogan is a hardcore maga.

Have you ever listened to Rogan, in full? Not snippets. He wanted a free form conversation with Kamala, her handlers refused. She is not capable enough to handle a free form interview without teleprompters or in ear communication. So many talented Democrats could have been viable options, yet she was the chosen one. Exceptionally poor plan by the democrat handlers. Glad it blew up in their faces.

I am not glad in blew up in their faces because I think we’re all in for a disastrous four years but you are not wrong about Rogan. Her handlers acted like it was this unreasonable thing that he wanted three whole hours with her but literally all his interviews are like that. It was a huge mistake that she and Walz as well did not do that podcast.

He didn't just want three whole hours - he wanted her there in-person in Austin, TX - a place not particularly close to DC or the states where she was focusing.

A place where no one else had difficulty going. She didn't want to go on his podcast; it wasn't logistics.

She was already in Texas. Joe said he would have worked around her schedule. He would have started the podcast early a.m. or late in evening or whenever to suit her schedule.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine Kamala doing a three hour unscripted, unedited interview? Nope and neither could her campaign handlers. Her idiocy and ultra-left agenda would have been front and center. She would not have been able to give detailed answers to any questions especially on her ever-changing “policies”. It would have been word salad after word salad. We would have been unburdened by what has been.

This is truth. No one could imagine her doing such an interview like that with anyone. And worse still is that her people didn’t even havr faith in her.

Joe agreed to cut the podcast down to one hour for her.

[Anonymous]

Waltz would have done fine with Rogan for 3 hours.