Does anyone else find Paris Hilton and Ivanka trump very attractive?

Anonymous
I find white women with yellow hair that synthetic, I-spend-my-life-under-anesthesia look to be very unattractive and creepy. Nothing on either one’s face matches what they were born with, and Ivanka still manages to have unremarkable looks despite all the work, geesh. To me, beauty means beautiful facial features. Heavy makeup, extensions, expensive clothes, two or three nose jobs, and fillers everywhere can make anyone look well groomed and wealthy, but they do not make for beauty.

OP, I’m not surprised you feel otherwise as an Asian. I went to a school with a lot of Asian students and used to hang out mostly with Asians. The conscious white worship and inferiority complex among Asians are off the charts. Like it’s acceptable among Asians to say that whites are more beautiful and that one wants white features/white-looking kids. I thought it was just Asian Americans, but then I traveled and lived in several Asian countries and found the white worship is even WORSE in Asian countries. Asians who are way more attractive than me fawned over my “tall” nose and told me they were intimidated by my looks. I’m very plain looking TBH (I don’t feel bad about that) and no one of any non-Asian race has ever called me anything other than cute at most.
Anonymous
No, I kind of think of that old 'why the long face?' joke when I look at them. They also have that 'wrong to be blonde' colouring.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Long faces and long aquiline noses...
It was considered an ideal and an aristocratic look (gag). I recognize it because I have it but I can't seem to cash in on it.

I think the real beauties are mixed ancestry.


Aquiline means "like an eagle"s beak." I don't think that's what you meant.


Not the PP but they both do have beaks so this is accurate. PP likely would know this.
Anonymous
No, but Paris looks the better of the two. Vanky’s had way too much work done.
Anonymous
They do nothing for me but I also am not white and I don't covet whiteness or white women.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Long faces and long aquiline noses...
It was considered an ideal and an aristocratic look (gag). I recognize it because I have it but I can't seem to cash in on it.

I think the real beauties are mixed ancestry.


Aquiline means "like an eagle"s beak." I don't think that's what you meant.


Not PP but an aquiline nose is a thing, perhaps your google is broken?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Long faces and long aquiline noses...
It was considered an ideal and an aristocratic look (gag). I recognize it because I have it but I can't seem to cash in on it.

I think the real beauties are mixed ancestry.


Aquiline means "like an eagle"s beak." I don't think that's what you meant.


Not PP but an aquiline nose is a thing, perhaps your google is broken?

Literally in the Wikipedia article on aquiline noses
Anonymous
Paris is attractive but Ivanka is not. Ivanka is uneven, like a hen and her face looks like extruded play doh, very full cheeks and bulbous features but the worst part is her soul.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No.
Paris does know how to look good for a camera, but I wouldn't say she's pretty or cute, let alone beautiful.
Ivanka is just repulsive.


You are legally blind.


No, I just don't find either of them attractive, unlike you and OP.
Attractiveness is subjective.


Who do you find attractive for point of reference?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Paris is attractive but Ivanka is not. Ivanka is uneven, like a hen and her face looks like extruded play doh, very full cheeks and bulbous features but the worst part is her soul.


I think the opposite. While Ivanka has clearly had a lot of work, it’s not as obvious. Paris has become too plastic looking.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:No, but Paris looks the better of the two. Vanky’s had way too much work done.


+1 Neither of them are particularly beautiful but I agree with this. Paris has generally good looks, a modelly body and an interesting nose and knows her angles. Ivanka has a reconstructed lower half of her face and looks like a generic plastic doll, like when your aunt finds you a Dollar Store "US Girls" doll because you asked for an American Girl doll. No part of her look is memorable or striking, just kind of intentionally inoffensive, like she told the surgeon "fix this" instead of "I want to look like this."
Anonymous
No, I never appreciated Paris' look. Ivanka seems prettier to me (I have no idea what she's had done).

I am not white and blond men and women are not particularly attractive to my eyes. Brunettes all the way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Long faces and long aquiline noses...
It was considered an ideal and an aristocratic look (gag). I recognize it because I have it but I can't seem to cash in on it.

I think the real beauties are mixed ancestry.


Aquiline means "like an eagle"s beak." I don't think that's what you meant.


Not PP but an aquiline nose is a thing, perhaps your google is broken?

Literally in the Wikipedia article on aquiline noses




Fixed
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No.
Paris does know how to look good for a camera, but I wouldn't say she's pretty or cute, let alone beautiful.
Ivanka is just repulsive.


You are legally blind.


No, I just don't find either of them attractive, unlike you and OP.
Attractiveness is subjective.


Who do you find attractive for point of reference?


Salma Hayek
Michelle Pfeiffer
Catherine Zeta Jones
Freida Pinto
Cate Blanchett
Monica Bellucci
Rachel Weisz
Elizabeth Hurley
Naomi Campbell
Jacqueline Bissett
Sharon Stone
Zendaya

A small selection of famous women I find attractive.

(Obviously they are not all currently in their prime).
Anonymous
What do you have against people with chins? Did your mom lose her chin from chewing tobacco?
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: