Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”
This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.
I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.
Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.
The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.
You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.
I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.
I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.