Does anyone else find Paris Hilton and Ivanka trump very attractive?

[Anonymous]

To answer the post title question, I suppose Paris's and Inanka's spouses and past partners find or found them attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

Are you one of those plastic people who only thinks plastic surgery is attractive?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

I'm sure politics also has nothing to do with your baseless "murder" allegations, troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

I'm sure politics also has nothing to do with your baseless "murder" allegations, troll.

So, I’m a troll because I’m stating facts. Laura Bush ran a stop sign and ran over her ex boyfriend. FACT. Her daughters have had work done and they’re still unattractive.

First I was accused of being a Conservative for saying that Chelsea Clinton and Howard Stern’s wife were rich Blonde women who were far less attractive than Paris and Ivanka.

And now, I’m a troll because I say a factual statement about the Bushes.

You know what? You’re crazy full of hate for pretty Blonde girls. I’ll bet you’re a hideous 200 pound toad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

I'm sure politics also has nothing to do with your baseless "murder" allegations, troll.

So, I’m a troll because I’m stating facts. Laura Bush ran a stop sign and ran over her ex boyfriend. FACT. Her daughters have had work done and they’re still unattractive.

First I was accused of being a Conservative for saying that Chelsea Clinton and Howard Stern’s wife were rich Blonde women who were far less attractive than Paris and Ivanka.

And now, I’m a troll because I say a factual statement about the Bushes.

You know what? You’re crazy full of hate for pretty Blonde girls. I’ll bet you’re a hideous 200 pound toad.

Mostly we’re just calling you a troll not conservative or liberal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

I'm sure politics also has nothing to do with your baseless "murder" allegations, troll.

So, I’m a troll because I’m stating facts. Laura Bush ran a stop sign and ran over her ex boyfriend. FACT. Her daughters have had work done and they’re still unattractive.

First I was accused of being a Conservative for saying that Chelsea Clinton and Howard Stern’s wife were rich Blonde women who were far less attractive than Paris and Ivanka.

And now, I’m a troll because I say a factual statement about the Bushes.

You know what? You’re crazy full of hate for pretty Blonde girls. I’ll bet you’re a hideous 200 pound toad.

Mostly we’re just calling you a troll not conservative or liberal

So, in other words, not agreeing with your clearly jealous limited view that thin, blonde women are always plastic makes someone a troll? Got it.

Paris and Ivanka are reasonably attractive women and you are still fugly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are pretty. Girl-next-door pretty. Not beautiful. You are likely attracted to the well-styled blond hair and well-made-up average features. They look expensive. That is a certain kind of attractive.

What kind of girls have you lived next to?????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes I think many people see them as extremely attractive- after all, theyre both major celebrities, you usually dont become a celebrity unless youre attractive.

They are literally celebrities because of who their parents are and no other reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.
Paris does know how to look good for a camera, but I wouldn't say she's pretty or cute, let alone beautiful.
Ivanka is just repulsive.

You are legally blind.

No, I just don't find either of them attractive, unlike you and OP.
Attractiveness is subjective.

Who do you find attractive for point of reference?

Salma Hayek
Michelle Pfeiffer
Catherine Zeta Jones
Freida Pinto
Cate Blanchett
Monica Bellucci
Rachel Weisz
Elizabeth Hurley
Naomi Campbell
Jacqueline Bissett
Sharon Stone
Zendaya

A small selection of famous women I find attractive.

(Obviously they are not all currently in their prime).

This. These women are beautiful. Ivanka is not nor Paris.

There is more than one way to be beautiful. it's not like there's a limited quotient of beautiful women and we reached our limit, lol. Paris was a massive sex symbol in the early 00s no matter how much the DCUM haus fraus feel about it

Her rep was bimbo with a rich daddy. Oh and her sex tape.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No.
Paris does know how to look good for a camera, but I wouldn't say she's pretty or cute, let alone beautiful.
Ivanka is just repulsive.

You are legally blind.

No, I just don't find either of them attractive, unlike you and OP.
Attractiveness is subjective.

Who do you find attractive for point of reference?

Salma Hayek
Michelle Pfeiffer
Catherine Zeta Jones
Freida Pinto
Cate Blanchett
Monica Bellucci
Rachel Weisz
Elizabeth Hurley
Naomi Campbell
Jacqueline Bissett
Sharon Stone
Zendaya

A small selection of famous women I find attractive.

(Obviously they are not all currently in their prime).

This. These women are beautiful. Ivanka is not nor Paris.

There is more than one way to be beautiful. it's not like there's a limited quotient of beautiful women and we reached our limit, lol. Paris was a massive sex symbol in the early 00s no matter how much the DCUM haus fraus feel about it

She was a massive sex symbol because a sex tape of hers was leaked. Not because she is just so amazingly desirable.

Her sex tape being leaked was news BECAUSE she was a sex symbol and favorite of Page Six. She got attention amongst all the other rich NYC party debs because she was a gorgeous, sexy blonde

Haha no. You seem really hung up on this lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

What did you mean by "plain as day"? That phrase means clear, understandable, obvious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

What did you mean by "plain as day"? That phrase means clear, understandable, obvious.

Omg, I was trying to be funny. But your sense of humor is lost in a sea of jealousy.

Barbara Bush and Jenna, Chelsea and the horse married to Howard Stern are fine, natural women despite their obvious plastic surgeries. Why? Because they’re still not pretty and are non-threatening to your sense of self.

But Paris and Ivanka are plastic. Why? Because they are significantly better looking than you are and therefore must be demeaned.

You are as basic as it gets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

What did you mean by "plain as day"? That phrase means clear, understandable, obvious.

Omg, I was trying to be funny. But your sense of humor is lost in a sea of jealousy.

Barbara Bush and Jenna, Chelsea and the horse married to Howard Stern are fine, natural women despite their obvious plastic surgeries. Why? Because they’re still not pretty and are non-threatening to your sense of self.

But Paris and Ivanka are plastic. Why? Because they are significantly better looking than you are and therefore must be demeaned.

You are as basic as it gets.

Damn let’s see what you like

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re both what I like to call “money pretty.”

This is the answer. Otherwise they look like the average make-up, made-up, blondes. Nothing wrong with that.

I disagree. They are prettier than the average rich Blonde with money. For example, compare them to Howard Stern’s wife, Beth. She’s a horse. And what about Chelsea Clinton? No amount of money could help that situation.

Come on, people. They are pretty, not stunningly gorgeous, but pretty, and yes, even without make up etc.

The fact that you are 'randomly' but REPEATEDLY selecting liberal women to compare who's looks have been scathingly nitpicked in the press is telling.

You do not know really what either of these women looks like without makeup, so that is something. You sound like a man, and men have NO idea just how much makeup can do and just how many women are virtually always wearing SOME makeup.

I hate to break it to some of you middle aged people posting but what is found attractive is changing, just like it always has in the course of the entirety of human history. And those of us who can't evolve will just be following in the footsteps of all the people who aged before us.

I don't 'get' Billie Eilish, but I'm confident that says more about me than the people who like her! In the sense that I am not keeping up with the times. We don't get to dictate to gen z what they find attractive. The wheels of time do not stop for anyone.

PP here, Politics have nothing to do with my examples. Most people in the public spotlight skew liberal. But I can add the Housewives to Orange County, who I believe are mostly conservative to the list of rich, Blonde women who are less attractive than Paris or Ivanka.

I’m a woman who went to Penn, but was not friends, with Ivanka back when she was a liberal. She’s pretty. WITHOUT MAKEUP. Sorry to break it to you.

You don't have to be sorry. No one here loses anything if she is pretty without makeup. She's not as pretty with makeup. Also now she seems to have starved herself into looking like a skeleton, which is also not helping things. Come join the Trump Fashion thread sometime if you want to defend your pal.

If by skeleton you mean fit, then we agree. I think she has the perfect body.

Also, why do you keep bringing politics into this? We’re talking about looks. You sound like someone who is hateful and jealous and blinded by your politics. I can’t imagine being so narrow minded in my perspective that I can’t get beyond my political views in a silly discussion about looks. To quote your favorite guy, Trump, “that’s just sad.”

You're not talking to the same person, I'm the one who brought up your trend and I am not the PP. Sure people in the public eye skew liberal but the two people you throw out are Michelle Obama and Chelsea Clinton? Two people who are not actually in the public eye much anymore and who not a single person in this thread cited as a beauty standard? Ok. haha.

Fair enough, neither of the Bush sisters is even close to being as pretty as Paris or Ivanka. Linda’s not bad, but Barbara Bush I? Woof, woof! Feel better?

Who is Linda Bush? Do you mean Jenna and Barbara? I think they are both perfectly fine looking but clearly have not had much work done and aren't showstoppers but are certainly not unattractive.

I meant Laura, the one married to W., the who murdered her ex boyfriend. And no Jenna and Barbara are not attractive. They are both as plain as day. They are not unattractive. They are average. Paris and Ivanka are pretty.

I’m just responding to PP who said I was politically biased. I’m not. Politics plays zero effect in my opinions of physical beauty.

What did you mean by "plain as day"? That phrase means clear, understandable, obvious.

Omg, I was trying to be funny. But your sense of humor is lost in a sea of jealousy.

Barbara Bush and Jenna, Chelsea and the horse married to Howard Stern are fine, natural women despite their obvious plastic surgeries. Why? Because they’re still not pretty and are non-threatening to your sense of self.

But Paris and Ivanka are plastic. Why? Because they are significantly better looking than you are and therefore must be demeaned.

You are as basic as it gets.

Damn let’s see what you like

I’m pretty. That’s why I like other pretty women