| Mine got in ED and I really do think it helped. |
|
One of my kids applied ED, was deferred, then got in RD. Another applied RD, was waitlisted, then got in off the waitlist.
Pretty lucky, eh? |
+1 It absolutely matters. Everyone I know that was recently accepted to UVA applied ED. |
That was VaTech |
Dean J has repeatedly said that the EA group is the strongest, which makes sense because it can include kids who apply REA to an Ivy. |
|
UVA publishes all the data.
For example, OOS admit rate during ED was 17%, compared to 12% in EA or RD. So ED gave a small bump but not 30% like at Emory or Wash U for example. Here is their ED post, read down for the rates 31% in-state, 17% OOS. https://news.virginia.edu/content/early-decision-notifications-uva-welcomes-first-cohort-class-2027 And here is their post on early action 27% in-state and 12% OOS. https://uvaapplication.blogspot.com/2023/02/2023-uva-early-action-admission.html |
So if EA is a stronger pool, why is the acceptance rate in ED higher? |
Seriously? Because it’s an easier admit. |
Basic math. The EA pool is huge. |
Ty! |
But it's only 1000 kids vs 6000. You can probably guess that the ED group is almost a subset of EA. The kids who have strong applications early on. |
That is the original question. UVA says it's not an easier admit. |
If it were my kid AND truly UVA were the 1st choice school, then I would go ED. Otherwise, if DC wanted UVa, but not as 1st choice, then I would go EA. The numbers do not lie. Most UVa ugrad offers are made either ED or EA, as recently as last year’s admissions cycle. |
| Why would anyone commit to a binding ED program if it gave no advantage. Why offer it at all then? |
|
ED gives an admission advantage vs RD at most schools, to a varying degree (from substantial to just a bit). That's assuming the candidate is strong by the school's definition.
If UVA is top choice ED is smart to do |