You have a very narrow definition of lawyering. Truly, this won’t meaningfully reduce the need for biglaw tier legal work in my lifetime. |
This is very true! I was in some white collar job with a consulting company, there are 15% of times where I get to work on something intense and new and about 85% is boring tick and tie. Over the last decade with proper software now my 8 hr is completely focused on the trouble shoot / intense 15% hours and management thinks my productivity went down 😂 |
You woefully underestimate the power of exponential growth and improvement. It's going to be making far less mistakes in a year from now and a lot less in 5 years. Take a look at midjourney. That art was pretty bad a year ago and now it's doing nearly photorealistic images, that didn't take long at all. Law is going to completely upended and once companies realize they can spend 99% less costs on legal work by using AI that produces quality work that is sufficient enough they will do it. |
I think this technology is available. You could just do a macro in word. In fact, you can ask chat got to build you a macro for word to do it. I’m a policy lawyer in government and I’m pretty sure all of our investigation documents are formatted this way. |
| *you can ask chat gpt to build you a macro in word |
It was also a lot harder to prove and expert wrong in past generations. Just saying, that probably has a lot to with it. For whatever reason priests have been able to avoid this. |
| So an AI will write the briefs. Will we have an AI judge review them too? |
Well, with DC requiring trials for basically every crime now, I wouldn't doubt at all tons of court cases will be completely automated to reduce giant backlogs at some point, because they can't hire enough human judges. Exactly where we are headed: |
| I’m fairly certain it won’t replace brief writing, as much as I’d like it to. Too many nuances go into it, including changing writing style when considering judge personality, other judges that your current judge respects and quoting their opinions more heavily, etc. those sorts of things are hard to integrate without substantial direction. It’ll certainly help things go faster though, thankfully. |
| AI judges would be less biased… |
|
Ha. I was just encouraging my son to consider becoming an electrician or plumber, focusing on those trade certifications first then picking up a advanced college degrees when he’s 40.
This was after a conversation with a plumber who is hired who was telling me about his multiple properties. |
| I’m in corporate finance/accounting and I think a ton more of this work will be done by AI very soon if not already. |
| Ten years ago everyone was saying self-driving cars would soon eliminate truck drivers, taxi drivers, etc. So far that hasn’t happened and fully autonomous driving seems a long way off. Likewise, I don’t see AI displacing white collar workers anytime soon. There are too many things it can’t do at all, like interviewing/deposing witnesses (for concerned lawyers), or can’t do as well as a human, and developing those capabilities could take decades. |
In high school, people barely had the internet. I didn't even own a cell phone until college. Now everyone has high speed internet and it is pretty much an essential utility. 3 year olds are completely fictional with a smart phone. I can look up almost all knowledge of human history on my smart phone. All of this development happened in 20 years. Non-STEM people really cannot wrap their brains around exponential and logarithmic growth. Once the AI genie is out of the bottle it is going to learn and improve at an exponential rate. It will easily replace many white collar jobs in a matter of a few years. |
NP. If you genuinely believe this, you are not remotely as intelligent as you think you are. |