
It is wrong to completely discard the SAT as unfair and biased. It is in fact more fair than many other metrics used for admissions like goa, essays, letters of recommendations, extracurriculars. This being said, anyone is free to choose a path that follows their interest and strengths. Some kids may do well focusing on academics and that could include a testing aspect, SAT or APs. Some may choose to focus on extracurriculars. Either is valid and worthy. To discount the effort of the kids studying for the SAT, as prep bots is just low. You can do better than this. |
So, for you, it’s not about “fairness” at all. |
They are admitted at a much higher rate (ED) than non-legacy. |
There was a good opinion piece in the New Yorker that mentioned all the things Harvard could have done beyond/in addition to dinging Asian applicants on personality if the institution was so dedicated to real diversity. Also raised the point that this is about a vanishingly small percent of colleges and universities-most are basically open admission. |
Great question. |
The world will never be pectly fair. That's why we have objective tests. Everyone takes the same exam for a same given amount of time with their own brain. |
How about ADLCs? They make up a significant portion of admissions. More so than URMs at many schools. |
Admissions officers must fill a class with students who can pay full tuition, so they are limited in how many disadvantaged students they can truly admit. Also, students taking on massive loans need to tread carefully. Even if they get it, how will they pay? This is true for both middle class students and disadvantaged ones. Obviously the most selective schools and some states have free/low cost tuition, but outside of that…colleges must balance a class economically. |
Also, you are thinking very one-dimensionally. Wealthy families hire tutors and take numerous AP classes, as well as advanced math courses like multivariable calculus and differential equations at local colleges, which enhance the rigor points and weighed GPA. The SAT, at the very least, only covers fundamental materials. If a low-income student is intelligent and determined, there are plenty of excellent free preparation resources available. In fact, standardized tests can be the best tool for economically disadvantaged, bright students. If you are from a low-income background and lack intelligence, there isn't much you can complain about. |
Of course I absolutely hate ALDC. Blacks, Aisans, non-ALDC Whites tax payers should be united against ALDC. |
It is quite eye-opening to read some of these posts- so many people showing how racist they are, even while they claim that they are not. Their convoluted way of thinking seems so normal to them, that they truly have no idea how easily everyone else can see how superior they feel their own race is to all others.
|
Now colleges that get federal money will potentially be liable for life altering punitive damages if they continue to violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. |
I'm shocked by racism agasint Asians. |
Any "stigma" is based on a self-developed pretense, and, why should anyone, including the "black" students, care if anyone thinks along the lines of a stigma? People have freedom of though, this is not a problem that needs to be solved. |
What are you saying, kids should be left to their own devices? It's not only in the academics. It's also true in sports, music, you name it, in any field where people are trying to improve themselves, there are private lessons, after hour practices, lessons, scrimmages, competitions, professional coaching, etc. Are you, for example, limiting pro-aspiring student athletes to 30 mins of practice a day, no coaching, no sports doctors, etc.? These are all privileges that many cannot afford. Those who can afford have a leg up. |