Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

James Woolsey confirmed the kidnapping story.
The nuclear deals in Saudi Arabia have been widely reported as has the israel story.

Not rumors and left wing crazy.

If Woolsey had told them anything that had legs, they would have charged Flynn with a lot more than lying to the FBI.

The government cut a deal with Flynn for cooperation. He was cooperating and then Mueller was fired, Flynn hired new attorneys and here we are. Do you think Woolsey lied?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

James Woolsey confirmed the kidnapping story.
The nuclear deals in Saudi Arabia have been widely reported as has the israel story.

Not rumors and left wing crazy.

If Woolsey had told them anything that had legs, they would have charged Flynn with a lot more than lying to the FBI.

The government cut a deal with Flynn for cooperation. He was cooperating and then Mueller was fired, Flynn hired new attorneys and here we are. Do you think Woolsey lied?

Go read what Woolsey said. It's not what you think he said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here's a twitter thread (with docs) that gives a Papadapolous explanation. Troubling behavior by feds.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1264603710115713026

This is actually horrible behavior by the feds.

I am convinced that since the FBI was unable to find anything that George Papadopoulos or Carter Page did or said that amounted to "collusion" or "conspiracy," that the FBI was desperate to continue their investigation. Even using their CHS (Mifsud and Halper), they couldn't find anything incriminating.
That is when they trotted out the Steele dossier that they KNEW was full of crap. They had to use it to keep the game going.

The actions that both the FBI took during Crossfire Hurricane AND during the Mueller investigation were indefensible. Every single person that was caught up by the unethical and likely illegal actions needs to be pardoned.

Read the Stone documents.

[Anonymous]

Woolsey was interviewed by the Mueller team. He would understand lying in that scenario would be perjury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

James Woolsey confirmed the kidnapping story.
The nuclear deals in Saudi Arabia have been widely reported as has the israel story.

Not rumors and left wing crazy.

If Woolsey had told them anything that had legs, they would have charged Flynn with a lot more than lying to the FBI.

The government cut a deal with Flynn for cooperation. He was cooperating and then Mueller was fired, Flynn hired new attorneys and here we are. Do you think Woolsey lied?

When was Mueller fired? Source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

James Woolsey confirmed the kidnapping story.
The nuclear deals in Saudi Arabia have been widely reported as has the israel story.

Not rumors and left wing crazy.

If Woolsey had told them anything that had legs, they would have charged Flynn with a lot more than lying to the FBI.

The government cut a deal with Flynn for cooperation. He was cooperating and then Mueller was fired, Flynn hired new attorneys and here we are. Do you think Woolsey lied?

Mueller was fired? We need a citation for that ridiculous claim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

James Woolsey confirmed the kidnapping story.
The nuclear deals in Saudi Arabia have been widely reported as has the israel story.

Not rumors and left wing crazy.

If Woolsey had told them anything that had legs, they would have charged Flynn with a lot more than lying to the FBI.

The government cut a deal with Flynn for cooperation. He was cooperating and then Mueller was fired, Flynn hired new attorneys and here we are. Do you think Woolsey lied?

Mueller was fired? We need a citation for that ridiculous claim.

I'lll tell you what... I'll save you from the hours and hours it will take you to find a citation only to come up empty.
I'lll present to you the actually testimony in which Mueller testified that his investigation was not "curtailed, stopped, or hindered."

Now, you can quit repeated the lie you stated above.
(and in another thread, liberals are ranting about how Trump supporters post things that aren't fact.
Here is the exact post... "You must be new here. You have no clue how stupid trump supporters are or what pure sh*t they post as fact. That’s what’s embarrassing." Seems like pure projection to me.)

[Anonymous]

A reminder that the judge that accepted Flynn's guilty plea back in Nov, 2017, Rudy Gonzaelez, was forced to recuse less than a week later.
The reason for his recusal was never stated, however, it was 72 hours after some text message from Strzok and Page were revealed:

Lisa Page: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that?” “Just appointed two months ago””..

Peter Strzok: “I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.”…

So, there was clearly a conflict requiring his recusal.

If the conflict -which required recusal- existed on December 7, 2017, when he recused, wouldn’t that same conflict have existed days earlier on November 30th?
Why was Flynn's plea thrown out at that point? Why was Gonzalez ever allowed to preside over this case and why did he not recuse himself from the beginning?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A reminder that the judge that accepted Flynn's guilty plea back in Nov, 2017, Rudy Gonzaelez, was forced to recuse less than a week later.
The reason for his recusal was never stated, however, it was 72 hours after some text message from Strzok and Page were revealed:

Lisa Page: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that?” “Just appointed two months ago””..

Peter Strzok: “I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.”…

So, there was clearly a conflict requiring his recusal.

If the conflict -which required recusal- existed on December 7, 2017, when he recused, wouldn’t that same conflict have existed days earlier on November 30th?
Why was Flynn's plea thrown out at that point? Why was Gonzalez ever allowed to preside over this case and why did he not recuse himself from the beginning?

Correction - the judge's name is Rudy Contreras.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A reminder that the judge that accepted Flynn's guilty plea back in Nov, 2017, Rudy Gonzaelez, was forced to recuse less than a week later.
The reason for his recusal was never stated, however, it was 72 hours after some text message from Strzok and Page were revealed:

Lisa Page: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that?” “Just appointed two months ago””..

Peter Strzok: “I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.”…

So, there was clearly a conflict requiring his recusal.

If the conflict -which required recusal- existed on December 7, 2017, when he recused, wouldn’t that same conflict have existed days earlier on November 30th?
Why was Flynn's plea thrown out at that point? Why was Gonzalez ever allowed to preside over this case and why did he not recuse himself from the beginning?

Flynn's guilty plea was repeated before Judge Sullivan. So twice, Flynn plead guilty, before two different judges and both in writing and through oral testimony. Was Flynn lying all of those times when he pled, or is he lying now? Because clearly he lied under oath. Which lie is the real lie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A reminder that the judge that accepted Flynn's guilty plea back in Nov, 2017, Rudy Gonzaelez, was forced to recuse less than a week later.
The reason for his recusal was never stated, however, it was 72 hours after some text message from Strzok and Page were revealed:

Lisa Page: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that?” “Just appointed two months ago””..

Peter Strzok: “I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.”…

So, there was clearly a conflict requiring his recusal.

If the conflict -which required recusal- existed on December 7, 2017, when he recused, wouldn’t that same conflict have existed days earlier on November 30th?
Why was Flynn's plea thrown out at that point? Why was Gonzalez ever allowed to preside over this case and why did he not recuse himself from the beginning?

Correction - the judge's name is Rudy Contreras.

Nothing to see here,,,,,,,,move along.

[Anonymous]

Remember who was playing Flynn

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-details-released-on-russia-related-payments-to-flynn-before-he-joined-trump-campaign/2017/03/16/52a4205a-0a55-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html

And this doesn't include Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Remember who was playing Flynn

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-details-released-on-russia-related-payments-to-flynn-before-he-joined-trump-campaign/2017/03/16/52a4205a-0a55-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html

And this doesn't include Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

$68,000? That's peanuts.
Bill Clinton got $500,000 for a single speech in Russia while his wife was Secretary of State.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember who was playing Flynn

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-details-released-on-russia-related-payments-to-flynn-before-he-joined-trump-campaign/2017/03/16/52a4205a-0a55-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html

And this doesn't include Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

$68,000? That's peanuts.
Bill Clinton got $500,000 for a single speech in Russia while his wife was Secretary of State.

If Flynn had disclosed the payment, he would have lost his security clearance. He didn't disclose it though.

Such a smarty. No ethics though.

[Anonymous]

Thing is, the treason was baked into the Trump campaign. They know they did it, they know the coordinated with Flynn.

Actually the entire GOP voting body knows the Trump campaign commit treason. They just don’t care because they have no sense of right and wrong. If they win, it’s all good to them.