Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]A reminder that the judge that accepted Flynn's guilty plea back in Nov, 2017, Rudy Gonzaelez, was forced to recuse less than a week later. The reason for his recusal was never stated, however, it was 72 hours after some text message from Strzok and Page were revealed: Lisa Page: “Rudy is on the [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]! Did you know that?” “Just appointed two months ago””.. Peter Strzok: “I did. We talked about it before and after. I need to get together with him.”… So, there was clearly a conflict requiring his recusal. If the conflict -which required recusal- existed on December 7, 2017, when he recused, wouldn’t that same conflict have existed days earlier on November 30th? Why was Flynn's plea thrown out at that point? Why was Gonzalez ever allowed to preside over this case and why did he not recuse himself from the beginning? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
