2022 Senate Map

[Anonymous]

If this buffoon in Georgia gets elected, the US is hopeless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Hampshire primary tonight yields another GOP winner

Phew. He will definitely be easier for Maggie Hassan to beat.

This campaign will be a clear contrast between my record of delivering for the people of New Hampshire and Don Bolduc’s radical, backward-looking agenda," Hassan said in an early morning press release. "If Don Bolduc had his way in the U.S. Senate, he would work to end Social Security, decimate Medicare, and vote to ban abortion nationwide. Don Bolduc is simply too extreme for New Hampshire, and his agenda is wildly out of touch with Granite Staters.”

The Democrats have spent over $52 MILLION on Republican candidates that they say would be a threat to democracy.
I hope it all backfires and that every. single. one. of. them. wins. It would be sweet justice.

New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for dems

“Dems” are ahead in New Hampshire across the board (except for Sununu who was obviously going to be re-elected) even in this AARP poll that only surveyed voters 50 and over. I’d say the New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for Rs.

Nope. Internal polls show all of New England in play. So is NY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did you watch the actual video? He understood everything she was saying with the closed captioning, and he only struggled with pronunciation on one word.
I don’t see a problem with this at all. He can certainly use this technology on the Senate floor and in other times he needs to.

Nice spin. The more stuff like this comes out the more likelihood Oz will win by 5+%. Fetterman’s team did a good job hiding this but it is coming out at exactly the wrong time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Hampshire primary tonight yields another GOP winner

Phew. He will definitely be easier for Maggie Hassan to beat.

This campaign will be a clear contrast between my record of delivering for the people of New Hampshire and Don Bolduc’s radical, backward-looking agenda," Hassan said in an early morning press release. "If Don Bolduc had his way in the U.S. Senate, he would work to end Social Security, decimate Medicare, and vote to ban abortion nationwide. Don Bolduc is simply too extreme for New Hampshire, and his agenda is wildly out of touch with Granite Staters.”

The Democrats have spent over $52 MILLION on Republican candidates that they say would be a threat to democracy.
I hope it all backfires and that every. single. one. of. them. wins. It would be sweet justice.

New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for dems

“Dems” are ahead in New Hampshire across the board (except for Sununu who was obviously going to be re-elected) even in this AARP poll that only surveyed voters 50 and over. I’d say the New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for Rs.

Nope. Internal polls show all of New England in play. So is NY

Everything is in play. A large portion of Trumpsters are Q Anon / Info Wars conspiracy nuts. All the polls that people are quoting in this thread aren’t taking into account that 10-20% of the voters out there are either ignoring pollsters or lying to them. Why would any logical person think that someone who thought there was a coordinated conspiracy to steal the election would either talk to a pollster or give them an honest response?

Look what happened in Brazil. Polls were off by 8-10% in Bolsonaro’s favor. Same thing is going to happen here. Dems will be lucky if they hold on to governors seats in Michigan and NY…these projections of them having a chance in a states like Ohio or Pennsylvania are wildly off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Hampshire primary tonight yields another GOP winner

Phew. He will definitely be easier for Maggie Hassan to beat.

This campaign will be a clear contrast between my record of delivering for the people of New Hampshire and Don Bolduc’s radical, backward-looking agenda," Hassan said in an early morning press release. "If Don Bolduc had his way in the U.S. Senate, he would work to end Social Security, decimate Medicare, and vote to ban abortion nationwide. Don Bolduc is simply too extreme for New Hampshire, and his agenda is wildly out of touch with Granite Staters.”

The Democrats have spent over $52 MILLION on Republican candidates that they say would be a threat to democracy.
I hope it all backfires and that every. single. one. of. them. wins. It would be sweet justice.

New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for dems

“Dems” are ahead in New Hampshire across the board (except for Sununu who was obviously going to be re-elected) even in this AARP poll that only surveyed voters 50 and over. I’d say the New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for Rs.

Nope. Internal polls show all of New England in play. So is NY

These internal polls, do they live in the Niagara Falls area?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this buffoon in Georgia gets elected, the US is hopeless.

Can you call Warnock a buffoon? Isnt that racist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did you watch the actual video? He understood everything she was saying with the closed captioning, and he only struggled with pronunciation on one word.
I don’t see a problem with this at all. He can certainly use this technology on the Senate floor and in other times he needs to.

Nice spin. The more stuff like this comes out the more likelihood Oz will win by 5+%. Fetterman’s team did a good job hiding this but it is coming out at exactly the wrong time.

Republicans elect people who refuse to listen all the time. Why would they not vote for someone who can't hear well?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did you watch the actual video? He understood everything she was saying with the closed captioning, and he only struggled with pronunciation on one word.
I don’t see a problem with this at all. He can certainly use this technology on the Senate floor and in other times he needs to.

He actually did not understand the questions.

"Are you committed to showing up on October 25 to debate your opponent no matter what happens?”

Fetterman: “No”

“To clarify, are you committed to showing up on October 25?"

Fetterman: “Well, yeah. Of course I’m going to show up on the 25th.”


One has to wonder if the "closed captioning" he is reading is actually directions on how he is supposed to respond to the questions.
I hope the Oz campaign is able to monitor the closed captioning during the debate.

[Anonymous]

My 84- and 85-year old parents just did their mail-in voting in Pennsylvania. Fetterman and Shapiro for both! Dad is a Dem. Mom is an independent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did you watch the actual video? He understood everything she was saying with the closed captioning, and he only struggled with pronunciation on one word.
I don’t see a problem with this at all. He can certainly use this technology on the Senate floor and in other times he needs to.

He actually did not understand the questions.

"Are you committed to showing up on October 25 to debate your opponent no matter what happens?”

Fetterman: “No”

“To clarify, are you committed to showing up on October 25?"

Fetterman: “Well, yeah. Of course I’m going to show up on the 25th.”


One has to wonder if the "closed captioning" he is reading is actually directions on how he is supposed to respond to the questions.
I hope the Oz campaign is able to monitor the closed captioning during the debate.

I will admit that I did not listen to the interview, but this is a bad example of your point.

The first question "Are you committed to showing up on October 25 to debate your opponent no matter what happens?” is a leading question that sets the person answering up to fail. They are trying to pin down Fetterman to showing up no matter what. No politician should take that type of commitment. It only allows their political opponent to do something rather offensive or degrading to pin him further or paint him as a hypocrite or put him in some other form of political headlock where there is no right answer.

So, he can be committed to showing up, as his latter answers say, without agreeing to "no matter what happens"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Hampshire primary tonight yields another GOP winner

Phew. He will definitely be easier for Maggie Hassan to beat.

This campaign will be a clear contrast between my record of delivering for the people of New Hampshire and Don Bolduc’s radical, backward-looking agenda," Hassan said in an early morning press release. "If Don Bolduc had his way in the U.S. Senate, he would work to end Social Security, decimate Medicare, and vote to ban abortion nationwide. Don Bolduc is simply too extreme for New Hampshire, and his agenda is wildly out of touch with Granite Staters.”

The Democrats have spent over $52 MILLION on Republican candidates that they say would be a threat to democracy.
I hope it all backfires and that every. single. one. of. them. wins. It would be sweet justice.

New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for dems

“Dems” are ahead in New Hampshire across the board (except for Sununu who was obviously going to be re-elected) even in this AARP poll that only surveyed voters 50 and over. I’d say the New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for Rs.

Nope. Internal polls show all of New England in play. So is NY

These internal polls, do they live in the Niagara Falls area?

WaPo says today that several House seats in New England may go red.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Hampshire primary tonight yields another GOP winner

Phew. He will definitely be easier for Maggie Hassan to beat.

This campaign will be a clear contrast between my record of delivering for the people of New Hampshire and Don Bolduc’s radical, backward-looking agenda," Hassan said in an early morning press release. "If Don Bolduc had his way in the U.S. Senate, he would work to end Social Security, decimate Medicare, and vote to ban abortion nationwide. Don Bolduc is simply too extreme for New Hampshire, and his agenda is wildly out of touch with Granite Staters.”

The Democrats have spent over $52 MILLION on Republican candidates that they say would be a threat to democracy.
I hope it all backfires and that every. single. one. of. them. wins. It would be sweet justice.

New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for dems

“Dems” are ahead in New Hampshire across the board (except for Sununu who was obviously going to be re-elected) even in this AARP poll that only surveyed voters 50 and over. I’d say the New Hampshire primary was a bloodbath for Rs.

Nope. Internal polls show all of New England in play. So is NY

Everything is in play. A large portion of Trumpsters are Q Anon / Info Wars conspiracy nuts. All the polls that people are quoting in this thread aren’t taking into account that 10-20% of the voters out there are either ignoring pollsters or lying to them. Why would any logical person think that someone who thought there was a coordinated conspiracy to steal the election would either talk to a pollster or give them an honest response?

Look what happened in Brazil. Polls were off by 8-10% in Bolsonaro’s favor. Same thing is going to happen here. Dems will be lucky if they hold on to governors seats in Michigan and NY…these projections of them having a chance in a states like Ohio or Pennsylvania are wildly off.

What makes you think that Democrats aren’t also lying to pollsters this time? Why would any logical person look at the wreckage left by the GOP and the wreckage they promise and think, “I’ve always voted Democratic or split my ticket, but this time I am definitely voting for the party that’s openly fascist”? Why do you make these assumptions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did you watch the actual video? He understood everything she was saying with the closed captioning, and he only struggled with pronunciation on one word.
I don’t see a problem with this at all. He can certainly use this technology on the Senate floor and in other times he needs to.

He actually did not understand the questions.

"Are you committed to showing up on October 25 to debate your opponent no matter what happens?”

Fetterman: “No”

“To clarify, are you committed to showing up on October 25?"

Fetterman: “Well, yeah. Of course I’m going to show up on the 25th.”


One has to wonder if the "closed captioning" he is reading is actually directions on how he is supposed to respond to the questions.
I hope the Oz campaign is able to monitor the closed captioning during the debate.

I will admit that I did not listen to the interview, but this is a bad example of your point.

The first question "Are you committed to showing up on October 25 to debate your opponent no matter what happens?” is a leading question that sets the person answering up to fail. They are trying to pin down Fetterman to showing up no matter what. No politician should take that type of commitment. It only allows their political opponent to do something rather offensive or degrading to pin him further or paint him as a hypocrite or put him in some other form of political headlock where there is no right answer.

So, he can be committed to showing up, as his latter answers say, without agreeing to "no matter what happens"

If you listened and watched the interview, you would know he did not understand the question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My 84- and 85-year old parents just did their mail-in voting in Pennsylvania. Fetterman and Shapiro for both! Dad is a Dem. Mom is an independent.

If your mom is an independent, it might have been a good idea for her to wait until the debate.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand how Oz has so much support. He's an out-of-town millionaire from New Jersey and Hollywood. He has no concept of what the average Pennsylvanian wants or needs. Other than med school, he's never lived more than a few weeks at a time in Pennsylvania. It's incredible how he's keeping the race close.