Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Glad to hear they are reconsidering. Between 12-15 starting to get vaccinated, adults mostly vaccinated and being outdoors and in the chlorinated pool, the risk is limited and no sense keeping meets restricted if the whole county is wide open by the time the meets start based on science.
If you base it on science, we still have a duty to protect our 12 and under and the 12-15 are just starting to get vaccinated. Kids and adults are packed closely together at these meets and there is often little distancing. Look, we get it. You base your worth on your kid winning. Lets just say your kid is the winner in every race. You can now brag and the rest of us can consider participating with strict rules to keep our kids safe.
I find this response really mean spirited. I for one want my child competing bc it has been so brutal physically and mentally for them all year. Kids don't get the infection as easily and given the incredibly high inoculation rates in the county (my children are also vaccinated) I am happy to let them race. If your child is not vaccinated, just keep them out of the pool but there is no reason for your fears to run my life.
They get infected. They are more likely for it not to be severe. Your kids are probably socializing, swimming and in person school. How have they really suffered? Maybe there is more to it if your kids are having mental heal issues and your idea of help is racing vs therapy and meds.
DP. You seem to not know very much about mental health or competitive sports. Exercise relieves depression and anxiety through multiple biological mechanisms. So does feeling a sense of purpose such as competing on a sport.
Why do you feel entitled to tell everyone else they should abide by your personal risk tolerance? The CDC had relaxed guidelines and the county had followed suit. They did so for a reason. Just because you don’t agree doesn’t mean no one should follow the new guidelines. Why do you think you know more than the CDC and county officials?
You seem to not understand the very important role that community spread has in changing the risks. Thankfully the people marking decisions do. You need to accept that you are very much a minority. If a swim league or any other organization is operating under national and local guidelines that happen to not match up with your personal risk tolerance, it’s on you to forego participation. PUBLIC health goes both ways. When the Covid situation was uncontrolled/dire and the strain on the healthcare system was great, many people had to do things they didn’t want to do in order to keep everyone safe. This included loss of jobs and/or salary cuts, losing childcare support, not seeing family, not getting to have proper funerals for lost loved ones, and so on. Now we are no longer on a state of public health emergency with Covid. Now we are in a situation where opening back up and reducing restrictions is on the best interest of the public as a whole. If that doesn’t work for you personally then do whatever makes you feel safe. But you cannot expect everyone else to abide by your personal assessment of risk.
I am a parent of two young kids so I do have a dog in this fight. This past year my children have only participated in activities on line with my personal risk tolerance. If I wasn’t comfortable with how a sport or activity was being handled, my kids did not do it. I didn’t call up the organization insisting that they impose rules that were stricter than CDC guidelines just so I could feel safe. This isn’t public school. It’s not mandatory. You need to get over it.