"It is honestly shocking how much Fox News' rhetoric about immigrants mirrors Nazi propaganda"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hannity hosting conspiracists telling lies about Parkland.


Everyone, this has to stop. We cannot have complete liars beaming white supremacy and hate into 4M living rooms of old white people every night, and expect American democracy to survive.
(Yes, this is on radio. Even WORSE. Rightwing radio has more listeners than Fox has viewers.)





https://twitter.com/bad_takes/status/1073040844926668804

Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

Yes - I agree cable news is the core problem. Infotainment and profit seeking from CNN and MSNBC and Murdoch-led propaganda at Fox. Terrible for democracy.

But not all newspapers are honest. Don't read the WSJ opinion section - it's all propagandists paid by Murdoch to lie. I know a WSJ reporter, and have heard personal stories about how Murdoch's handpicked editor turned the opinion section into pure propaganda (and influenced the news section too.)

I've read both the NYT and WSJ for years.

The difference is that the WSJ has crazy opinions just in the Opinion section while in the NYT they are biasing absolutely every page.

That is utter nonsense. The times is good journalism.

Read both, objectively and for years, and you'll notice the difference.

The Times does have some amazing journalism but packaged with an incredible and pervasive amount of ideological garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

Yes - I agree cable news is the core problem. Infotainment and profit seeking from CNN and MSNBC and Murdoch-led propaganda at Fox. Terrible for democracy.

But not all newspapers are honest. Don't read the WSJ opinion section - it's all propagandists paid by Murdoch to lie. I know a WSJ reporter, and have heard personal stories about how Murdoch's handpicked editor turned the opinion section into pure propaganda (and influenced the news section too.)

I've read both the NYT and WSJ for years.

The difference is that the WSJ has crazy opinions just in the Opinion section while in the NYT they are biasing absolutely every page.

That is utter nonsense. The times is good journalism.

Read both, objectively and for years, and you'll notice the difference.

The Times does have some amazing journalism but packaged with an incredible and pervasive amount of ideological garbage.

No, WSJ has always had a strong right wing bias to their entire newspaper, but it’s gotten far worse since Murdoch took over. The sad thing is that it retains a veneer of respectability but its readers - or at least the commentariat - has become incredibly low-information. The NYT suffers from the same corporate friendly issues that plague almost all news sources today, but there’s no ‘ideological garbage.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

(Different poster)

???

Well, tell us: what are your news sources?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

And, it seems as if one poster here is obsessed with Fox. Seems as if there is a weekly thread criticizing Fox for something. I guess that is what happens when you're #1 in cable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

And, it seems as if one poster here is obsessed with Fox. Seems as if there is a weekly thread criticizing Fox for something. I guess that is what happens when you're #1 in cable.

#1 in mentally-unstable, self-absorbed old farts with nothing better to do? It's 2018 -- who even sits around watching TV?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

And, it seems as if one poster here is obsessed with Fox. Seems as if there is a weekly thread criticizing Fox for something. I guess that is what happens when you're #1 in cable.

#1 in mentally-unstable, self-absorbed old farts with nothing better to do? It's 2018 -- who even sits around watching TV?

So, tell me oh, wise one.
If you don't watch Fox, how do you know their content? How do you know how they address stories?
Interesting how you characterize people you don't even know. Kind of like that "basket of deplorable" comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

+2

Don't get my news from any cable news channel. Mostly listen to NPR, read Washington Post, go online for BBC and other international sources.

Most of the liberal DCUM crowd don't rely on CNN and MSNBC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

And, it seems as if one poster here is obsessed with Fox. Seems as if there is a weekly thread criticizing Fox for something. I guess that is what happens when you're #1 in cable.

#1 in mentally-unstable, self-absorbed old farts with nothing better to do? It's 2018 -- who even sits around watching TV?

So, tell me oh, wise one.
If you don't watch Fox, how do you know their content? How do you know how they address stories?
Interesting how you characterize people you don't even know. Kind of like that "basket of deplorable" comment.

I love when the right-wingers try to be all snarky and act like they're zinging you and fail. Can you hear the fizzle....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

+2

Don't get my news from any cable news channel. Mostly listen to NPR, read Washington Post, go online for BBC and other international sources.

Most of the liberal DCUM crowd don't rely on CNN and MSNBC.

Those 3 sources have a clear slant to the left.

You could balance them with the WSJ, FT, realclearpolitics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

And, it seems as if one poster here is obsessed with Fox. Seems as if there is a weekly thread criticizing Fox for something. I guess that is what happens when you're #1 in cable.

#1 in mentally-unstable, self-absorbed old farts with nothing better to do? It's 2018 -- who even sits around watching TV?

So, tell me oh, wise one.
If you don't watch Fox, how do you know their content? How do you know how they address stories?
Interesting how you characterize people you don't even know. Kind of like that "basket of deplorable" comment.

I love when the right-wingers try to be all snarky and act like they're zinging you and fail. Can you hear the fizzle....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hannity hosting conspiracists telling lies about Parkland.


Everyone, this has to stop. We cannot have complete liars beaming white supremacy and hate into 4M living rooms of old white people every night, and expect American democracy to survive.
(Yes, this is on radio. Even WORSE. Rightwing radio has more listeners than Fox has viewers.)





https://twitter.com/bad_takes/status/1073040844926668804

Disgusting.

Do you know this man’s background?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup, this is my experience talking to my uncle who only watches Fox.

He has no idea about the truth. I asked him about Manafort and he said “Who?”

But he can quote Fox lies chapter and verse about Hilllary and Uranium One and Foundation etc etc.

You obviously don't watch Fox. Manafort is much discussed there. Hillary and Uranium One come up occasionally. But, of course, they never come up on the other networks.

+1.

Personally I think you need to watch both CBS News or similar AND Fox News to actually be informed about what's happening on our country.

Each prioritize only the most convenient half.

+2
Yep. I feel the only way to get both sides to a story is to watch/read all kinds of sources. They're all biased, so you might as well hear all the slants and them make up your own mind.

Exactly

Nonsense. Reputable newspapers are as unbiased as they can be. You can get international papers on line. Do not watch any cable or broadcast news! At least the act of reading involves the critical center’s of the brain.

+1

Who even watches TV news now? Aside from 70+ crowd.

If you'll both notice, the PP mentioned watching AND reading all news sources. Critical reading, and all...
Additionally, most of the liberal DCUM crowd lives and breathes CNN, MSNBC, etc., so you might want to talk to your cohort about their TV viewing habits.

In your Fox-addled imagination.

+1

The only ones obsessed with CNN and MSNBC are Trump and his idiot supporters.

And, it seems as if one poster here is obsessed with Fox. Seems as if there is a weekly thread criticizing Fox for something. I guess that is what happens when you're #1 in cable.

#1 in mentally-unstable, self-absorbed old farts with nothing better to do? It's 2018 -- who even sits around watching TV?

Well, you tell us. Who's watching CNN and Rachel Maddow?