WaPo takes deep dive into DCPS residency fraud

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The DC auditor just released a new report -- even when someone is paying tuition, the District usually fails to collect it.

https://wamu.org/story/18/04/17/d-c-failed-enforce-residency-public-school-students-audit-finds/


Excerpt

In a 28-page audit made public on Tuesday, Lucas outlined a number of shortcomings in the enforcement of the city’s residency law, the majority focused on the Office of the State Superintendent of Education:

For the 2014, 2015 and 2016 school years, the city admitted 85 non-resident students to public and charter schools, but in 82 of those cases did not collect the full tuition they were required to pay prior to the start of the school year. Instead, payment plans were extended to a majority of the students, even though they were not asked to prove that they had a comparable school option where they lived or were facing financial problems that prevented them from paying the tuition in full.

Of the 79 non-resident students that were on payment plans, 51 were allowed to remain in their D.C. school despite having defaulted on what they owed. The amount of uncollected tuition over the three-year period amounted to $169,127.

OSSE failed to report 46 of 67 of the residency fraud cases it uncovered to the city’s attorney general, which prosecutes the cases, or to the city’s Board of Ethics and Government Accountability when they involved the children of city employees. It also did not notify D.C. Public Schools and the charter school system, “which limited the school systems’ ability to proactively identify similar cases.”

In 32 of the 46 fraud cases, OSSE had no settlement agreements with the families found to have violated the law. In the 14 cases for which it did, it only collected $73,090 of the $454,727 in unpaid tuition it was owed. And when that tuition wasn’t paid, OSSE didn’t take steps to let schools know so they could discontinue the students’ enrollment.

Due to a number of shortcomings within OSSE, the city is owed at least $550,764 in unpaid tuition by non-residents.

The inspector general’s audit also found that compared to school systems in surrounding counties in Maryland and Virginia, “District residency documentation requirements were less stringent than those in neighboring school districts.”

In a response to the audit, State Superintendent Hanseul Kang said that in 2017, D.C. centralized residency fraud investigations within OSSE and has strengthened the rules around auditing school records and investigating whether or not certain non-resident students are attending D.C. schools.

“Not only do we now review 100 percent of student residency verification forms, we have changed our policy to lower the threshold to trigger a full review of supporting documents families submitted to prove residency,” she wrote to Lucas. “For schools that fail our sample review, we automatically initiate a residency file review on all students attending those schools.”


it's insane that such poor oversight is not only tolerated, but that those responsible for administering residency verification do not seem the least bit concerned that their actions would be audited, or that their inaction could potentially be exposed. Misspending funds is an obvious red line, but protecting the bottom line by collecting revenue where required has the same net effect as negligent spending.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So that’s what happened to the Leckie principal!


Right?!?!



The poster at 01/05/2017 14:03 was actually right!

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/75/580983.page
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I am a DC resident with multiple children in DCPS. The vitriol on this thread is disturbing. The lack of empathy for the non-resident children who are enrolled by their parents through no fault of their own, and the consequences for these children of publicly shaming their parents. The demonization of non-resident parents, who, with regard to PG County in particular, were pushed out or priced out of DC.

I’m not suggesting that gentrifiers or white people should feel guilty, but hoping they would have some sensitivity to the complicated racial history and dynamics linking PG and DC.

Plus, the suggestion that tax returns/government benefits paperwork should be a singular means of proving residence shows serious a lack of understanding of and bias against poor communities.Too bad the energy isn’t channeled into legitimate advocacy for underserved families in DC instead of advocating for a witch hunt.


This is so amazingly naive to me. Do you work in the tax field? Do you work in poor communities? Did you know that in 2015 DC expanded the eligibility for the EITC to residents without children? A tax return is standard in poor communities. It is more prevalent than driver's licenses or car registrations. From Feb - April most housing projects, community groups, rec centers and quite a few libraries open up free tax prep locations to help low income residents file. For many of these families it is a relied upon resource to get them through the rest of the year.

In addition the only children named in these articles have been children of city employees. My children attend school with a family who was named in the last go around (chancellor placements rather than residency fraud). Not only are the children NOT publicly shamed but they are still in the school and the mother posts on the listserve. It is appalling the lack of personal responsibility shown by the people who have been outed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why is DCPS so quick to coddle fraudsters who live in PG County or wherever?


Because apparently, many DCPS/OSSE employees are themselves engaged in the same fraud, and so have an interest in seeing that there is no enforcement.
Anonymous
Everyone knew what happened to the Leckie principal but it was kept so hush hush for whatever reason.

Rumor is she bought in SE when she was first caught and kept her kids there for another year until they really brought down the hammer.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a DC resident with multiple children in DCPS. The vitriol on this thread is disturbing. The lack of empathy for the non-resident children who are enrolled by their parents through no fault of their own, and the consequences for these children of publicly shaming their parents. The demonization of non-resident parents, who, with regard to PG County in particular, were pushed out or priced out of DC.

I’m not suggesting that gentrifiers or white people should feel guilty, but hoping they would have some sensitivity to the complicated racial history and dynamics linking PG and DC.

Plus, the suggestion that tax returns/government benefits paperwork should be a singular means of proving residence shows serious a lack of understanding of and bias against poor communities.Too bad the energy isn’t channeled into legitimate advocacy for underserved families in DC instead of advocating for a witch hunt.


This is so amazingly naive to me. Do you work in the tax field? Do you work in poor communities? Did you know that in 2015 DC expanded the eligibility for the EITC to residents without children? A tax return is standard in poor communities. It is more prevalent than driver's licenses or car registrations. From Feb - April most housing projects, community groups, rec centers and quite a few libraries open up free tax prep locations to help low income residents file. For many of these families it is a relied upon resource to get them through the rest of the year.

In addition the only children named in these articles have been children of city employees. My children attend school with a family who was named in the last go around (chancellor placements rather than residency fraud). Not only are the children NOT publicly shamed but they are still in the school and the mother posts on the listserve. It is appalling the lack of personal responsibility shown by the people who have been outed.


It would be "appalling" to shame the kids. Ech. I don't know what being "outed" means. Sounds very subjective and scarlet letter. Either a family is investigated and cleared, or investigated and not cleared. In the former case, they should be left alone, in the latter, charged and accorded their right to due process/appeal in court. If they fail to challenge in court, or prevail in court, they are charged, booted and fined. Simple.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So that’s what happened to the Leckie principal!


Right?!?!



The poster at 01/05/2017 14:03 was actually right!

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/75/580983.page


This is nothing new. There was a long-serving former principal at John Eaton E.S. who lived in MD but his child was at Eaton. DCPS just looked the other way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is DCPS so quick to coddle fraudsters who live in PG County or wherever?


Because apparently, many DCPS/OSSE employees are themselves engaged in the same fraud, and so have an interest in seeing that there is no enforcement.


This. Sadly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Everyone knew what happened to the Leckie principal but it was kept so hush hush for whatever reason.

Rumor is she bought in SE when she was first caught and kept her kids there for another year until they really brought down the hammer.


According to the Post, her husband says she is living in SE and the kids are still in a DC school. They interviewed him at a home in Maryland where he says he lives.
Anonymous
At 12:22: our status quo may seem "insane" to you, but bureaucrats diverting public funds to serve personal needs and policies is a long-standing tradition in D.C. Many D.C. voters don't care that it is going on because they share the same needs and interests. I'm sure this will change one day, but it ain't gonna be any time soon.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:At 12:22: our status quo may seem "insane" to you, but bureaucrats diverting public funds to serve personal needs and policies is a long-standing tradition in D.C. Many D.C. voters don't care that it is going on because they share the same needs and interests. I'm sure this will change one day, but it ain't gonna be any time soon.


Auditing publicly funded agencies is a routine practice. DC has only had an elected AG since 2014. "long-standing tradition" is meaningless - voters may not ultimately care but heads have to roll within any agency where fraud and negligence are proven. OSSE is failing at a systematic level by understaffing enforcement but on a case by case level they're not doing their job even when they catch people dead to rights.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is DCPS so quick to coddle fraudsters who live in PG County or wherever?


Because apparently, many DCPS/OSSE employees are themselves engaged in the same fraud, and so have an interest in seeing that there is no enforcement.


This. Sadly.


well that's on the AG for not making cases against abusers and on OSSE for tolerating abuse within its agency. They'll get it when they see staffing levels reduced and organizational shake up from their mess of political embarrassment.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:At 12:22: our status quo may seem "insane" to you, but bureaucrats diverting public funds to serve personal needs and policies is a long-standing tradition in D.C. Many D.C. voters don't care that it is going on because they share the same needs and interests. I'm sure this will change one day, but it ain't gonna be any time soon.


NP: I feel like gentrifiers to dc would be thrilled to get someone to actually do something about residency fraud. Shut down some schools that cater primarily to Marylanders and open up some seats for dc residents at dc schools.
Anonymous
Grosso has weighed in. Don't expect anything resembling a crackdown anytime soon.

https://twitter.com/maustermuhle/status/986340225440940037
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Grosso has weighed in. Don't expect anything resembling a crackdown anytime soon.

https://twitter.com/maustermuhle/status/986340225440940037


Ugh.

Translation:
We know there is fraud, but it's hard and takes work to ferret out and honestly, we don't really care very much.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: