I think you're the one that wants a medal for NOT showing up. |
Where do you work that was in person the entire time? And why don’t you know the past tense of the verb “choose”? |
I did exactly as you describe except it was closer to 48 hours a week. So did all of my GenX peers in our 30s/early 40s working at DoJ from 1997-2014. Telework was not a thing, or remote or bizarre flex scheduling that allows people to leave at 1 or 2. And no, there emphatically was not adequate childcare slots in the District or close-in Arlington, Bethesda or SS. A lot of panicky scrambling for daycare and subpar nannies and nanny shares were the norm. |
Gosh, I do feel for you to have to hike in from Frederick. Hindsight being 20/20 and all, but DH would have had a reverse commute. |
So many idiots on this thread. Do you really not comprehend how adding 3-4 hours of commute time to a full work schedule makes most childcare arrangements unworkable? Because that is what some of us are up against. I agree that anyone who is WFH with small children and no childcare is an egregious offense, but where is the evidence this was happening in significant numbers? Why should everyone else have to suffer because of the abuse by a few? |
Not the PP, but I'm a nurse manager and that's technically an "office" job but it's not a job that you can do remote. My hours are Mon-Fri 8 - 4:30 or 5. I split the evening, night, and weekend on-call time with the other nurse managers in my service line. There's a lot of things that touch people that require one to show up. |
PP said they were a fed, which is why I asked. |
There are so many bitter people here. Before Covid I was able to telework two days a week. So could my husband. Now he has to return to the office full time and I probably will too (haven’t heard from my agency yet). So no it’s not like before covid. My commute is an hour long and his is an hour and 20 minutes long one way. We live right next to the metro but they moved my husband’s office so now it’s just much further. That’s two hours a day commuting for me and almost 3 hrs for him. In that time we can make dinner, do the laundry etc. We are both in litigation so our jobs are actually stressful and don’t have much time during the day. But those two hours that I save mean everything. Also my eldest two are in elementary school and extended day is completely full. There is a waitlist to get in. I pick them up from the bus stop at 3 pm and bring them home. Since they are in 3rd and 4th grade they are self sufficient and even set the table for dinner and make the salad. Since we are a bilingual family, a tutor comes at 3:30 three days a week to tutor them in my native language. My youngest who is three is at daycare and my husband picks her up at 5:30 while I prep dinner. It’s tough having three kids but telework makes it much it much easier. Sure I can find childcare but it’s not easy. Who would want to work for two hours only? And it’s not cheap. And when would I find the time to cook? Republicans pretend to care about families but people don’t have kids or as many kids as they want because it’s so hard to balance working with having a family. Our school calls us and tells us to pick the kids up for every sniffle. What happens now? I would have to leave work (takes an hour) pick them up and drive them home. All that time wasted when I could have just driven 5 minutes and gone right back to work. Since my work has so many deadlines I will have to make up for the lost time in the evening. How do I balance that with spending time with my kids, making dinner, giving my 3 year old a bath? Cleaning up…. The entire thing is insane and people like PP who want us all to suffer are just disgusting. Society is going to have to resolve this issue. How do people have kids while two spouses are working full time? Republicans have the answer to that. They want women to stay at home. That’s what may end up happening because many of us may just have no choice. I’m sure PP will be celebrating |
Sounds like you need new friends or a new job. |
Misery loves company is not a valid argument. It's just not. You want everyone to suffer like you instead of everyone to have a better work/life balance. I feel sorry for you that you're such a miserable person. |
Because as a taxpayer, I (NP) shouldn’t pay for her individual luxury of “balance.” I and apparently millions of others would prefer to pay her a part-time salary and no federal benefits — because she is in fact working part time. Whether she wants to be all-in and miss games or lean out and watch basketball doesn’t matter to me. Her fraudulence is the problem. |
You don't know sh--. I was able to TW and have a maxi-flex schedule that allowed me to work my hours anytime between 5 a.m. and midnight. How arrogant that you think that you everyone's schedule. And how despicable that you are gloating at people's lives being upended. You're a nasty POS. Period. |
How about showing some evidence that this is a widespread problem. Anecdotes do not count. |
I don’t know this guy but there are TONS of positions in the DMV that require a clearance and cannot be remote/telework. Also almost all healthcare jobs, ranging from an xray tech to neurosurgeon. |
Yeah some disgusting people on this thread |