"Don't Text Me So Early!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PPs saying learn to silence your phones are clueless about real life with teens and elderly parents. Calls and texts can come from any number in an emergency. Enjoy your years of having the luxury to silence your phones or choose phone numbers that can break through. That is not real life with teens and elderly parents. Or maybe you don’t care if you are reachable in an emergency. I which case, be my guest and silence your phones.

In this case, SIL could silence notifications from OP. Problem solved.

She can moving forward. She probably thought it was a good idea to be able to receive texts from her in case her sibling had an emergency and didn't realize that op was is an inconsiderate ogre

Who is texting someone in a true emergency??

Aunt Betty, that's who. But, she waits until 9 am.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You're in the wrong. Period.

+1. Op is wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.

Strongly disagree. There are no limits on texts, only calls.

No one wants unlimited texts at all hours of the day and night including yourself.
You’re a hypocrite and rude.

Uhhh, that's why there is a DND feature. Holy sh*t there are some stupid people here.

[Anonymous]

Your SIL is an idiot and you are a whiner posting something so stupid.

[Anonymous]

An identical conversation happened back when people refused to silence email notifications and now it’s absurd to think you should wait to send emails until 9am. Same will happen with texts. SIL is likely older and struggles with technology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would never text someone at 8am what is the hurry font he rude.

I also don’t text past 10 pm.

It was before 7am!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thats what my SIL responded with when I sent a note inquiring about her availability for my DS's HS graduation party. I sent it at 6:51 AM today.

My feeling is if you don't want alerts going off, then you silence your phone or set up Do Not Disturb. It's not like I was banging on her door. She has always been snotty so this is par for the course but I also sent it to others

Just gut checking myself here- there aren't time limits for texting, right?

Isn't it up to the receipient to control their own quiet time?

As I rule, I NEVER text people before 8 am or after 9 pm unless they are my kids, SO, or a few close friends.

There are absolutely time limits. An email would have been appropriate for that time, but not texts.

[Anonymous]

Well now she’s told you to keep non emergency texts to appropriate hours. Seems like she did exactly what dcum always tells people to do, used her words. Hopefully, you’ll stop sending nonsense texts so early in the morning (to anyone).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait. People get audio signals of their texts? Why on earth?

If there is no scenario you can conceive of where someone might need to reach you urgently, then you truly lead a charmed life and I am envious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You're in the wrong. Period.

+1. Op is wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.

Strongly disagree. There are no limits on texts, only calls.

No one wants unlimited texts at all hours of the day and night including yourself.
You’re a hypocrite and rude.

Uhhh, that's why there is a DND feature. Holy sh*t there are some stupid people here.

You’re the whole stupid with texting nonsense early.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You're in the wrong. Period.

+1. Op is wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.

Strongly disagree. There are no limits on texts, only calls.

No one wants unlimited texts at all hours of the day and night including yourself.
You’re a hypocrite and rude.

Uhhh, that's why there is a DND feature. Holy sh*t there are some stupid people here.

The stupid people who dont know what time it is, like you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You're in the wrong. Period.

+1. Op is wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.

Strongly disagree. There are no limits on texts, only calls.

You can disagree all you want to you are wrong.

They all describe the steps that receivers need to take in order not to be disturbed, because they know--it's too early. But rude people either refuse to admit, or they just don't know, they're rude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait. People get audio signals of their texts? Why on earth?

If there is no scenario you can conceive of where someone might need to reach you urgently, then you truly lead a charmed life and I am envious.

More like a sad, selfish life, in which there is nobody who depends or counts on her, more likely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wish there were a way to set a time for texts to be delivered. Would solve all the problems for everyone on both ends. You can write your text when you want and make sure recipient receives it later (when you text those who are unable/unwilling to set their phone notifications properly).

I do this all the time. Android.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait. People get audio signals of their texts? Why on earth?

If there is no scenario you can conceive of where someone might need to reach you urgently, then you truly lead a charmed life and I am envious.

That’s what a phone call is for. OP’s question is about texts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why aren’t you texting your brother?

yes!!!!