Is NYU still Top 25?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.

USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,

Not even funny.
Speaking of Sunny
https://www.timesunion.com/education/article/suny-deficit-hit-1-billion-future-aid-tuition-18580207.php

"SUNY warns of future $1B deficit without higher tuition or more aid"

Avoid.

UCLA is a top university.

USC would be behind, with NYU.

Sunny is not even close to any of those 3.

USC and UCLA are pretty much peer schools.

Only CA residents who couldn't pay USC insist that.

No Berkeley is a peer school to UCLA.

NYU is a peer school to USC.

They are all similar in prestige.

Again USC outcome is better than UCLA which can translate to better brand and prestige in the real world.

+1. Real world outcomes are what families are looking for. Employers aren't splitting hairs between USC and UCLA.

$35,000 vs $90,000 isn't a hair.

Low income families under $80,000 HHI pay NOTHING for UCLA.

Does that make you mad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.

USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,

Not even funny.
Speaking of Sunny
https://www.timesunion.com/education/article/suny-deficit-hit-1-billion-future-aid-tuition-18580207.php

"SUNY warns of future $1B deficit without higher tuition or more aid"

Avoid.

UCLA is a top university.

USC would be behind, with NYU.

Sunny is not even close to any of those 3.

USC and UCLA are pretty much peer schools.

Only CA residents who couldn't pay USC insist that.

No Berkeley is a peer school to UCLA.

NYU is a peer school to USC.

They are all similar in prestige.

Again USC outcome is better than UCLA which can translate to better brand and prestige in the real world.

+1. Real world outcomes are what families are looking for. Employers aren't splitting hairs between USC and UCLA.

$35,000 vs $90,000 isn't a hair.

Low income families under $80,000 HHI pay NOTHING for UCLA.

Does that make you mad?

???