Is NYU still Top 25?

[Anonymous]

I know it dropped quite a bit this year, but wondering if it's still WashU/Emory level. Is it worth the cost over those schools?

[Anonymous]

Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

[Anonymous]

Is this really not something you can google? Or perhaps do just a search on NYU?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this really not something you can google? Or perhaps do just a search on NYU?

If you see me OP, you can tell I don't mean in a literal sense.

[Anonymous]

I’m surprised it was ever considered T25.

[Anonymous]

More like T30.

It depends on colleges but highly selective for Stern, CAS, and Tish.

Stern and CAS had 7% acceptance rate last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.

[Anonymous]

OP, if money is no object, then NYU can be fantastic for a student admitted to Tisch, Stern, etc. But if a student/parents are going into debt to attend, then they should consider other, less expensive options.

[Anonymous]

Not worth $75K, but everything in NYC is overpriced.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.

USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not worth $75K, but everything in NYC is overpriced.

NYU is not special among many other privates for price.

[Anonymous]

I’d say it will probably maintain T50 but higher than that is questionable. It is the rich kid school in NYC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.

USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,

That was maybe 30 years ago. keep up in the 21st century.
NYU had around 10% overall acceptance rate compared to Stony Brook close to 50%
LMFAO you are clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you REALLY think the quality of NYU relative to WUSTL/Emory changed by much from year to year based on what USNWR rankings say? Exh A as to why ranking colleges as a whole is worse than meaningless.

Most undergrads in the T100 are good. But I'm only willing to pay 300k for a name brand with strong ascending reputation. Is that NYU? That's what I'm asking.

Absolutely, schools like NYU, USC, and Northeastern will keep on rising.

USC is known as a school for those who couldn't get into its rival - UCLA. In terms of quality, location, and cost, many choose USC only after they were rejected by UCLA. I am inclined to think the same thing with NYU, US News ranked #35. It's an option for those who didn't make the cut at Stony Brook -- SUNY, US News ranked #58,

That was maybe 30 years ago. keep up in the 21st century.
NYU had around 10% overall acceptance rate compared to Stony Brook close to 50%
LMFAO you are clueless.

Ok NYU booster.

Not everything is about NYU. Some parents are concerned about its low ROI, low FA - but high cost. It's not a good choice unless you are flush with cash.