How to answer sons who are asking me why so many girls have 'girls are better' merch

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I tell my boys that they can do anything girls can do. I tell them that they are biologically stronger than girls. I tell them that men do all the most dangerous jobs and that the jobs that keep society functioning are mostly male dominated.


Do you tell them that society should be male dominated? Do you tell them that their strength makes them better than girls or less strong boys?


Wow sounds like I hit a nerve!


Sure! Sounds like you’re deliberately raising boys to believe their strength makes them superior to other people. That’s toxic and makes you part of the problem.


DP. If you WANT boys to have a nuanced understanding of what it means that men are on the average stronger than women, it’s sure as sh*t not gonna happen by lecturing them about decentering themselves, expecting them to be superhumanly resistant to negative messaging, and expecting them to accept being judged/excluded based on their gender/color.

Teaching kids about this stuff cannot be left to ditzy leftists whose understanding of human and child psychology goes no deeper than a bumpersticker slogan. Who believe that all we have to do is read our children the Antiracist Baby Book and then they will be perfect activists.

The fact is, the progessive take on teaching values to kids is usually a projection of their own anxiety to make a show of their own moral purity. The focus is all on the adult using the proper moral words, not on how kids actually learn.


I’m the “ditzy leftist” above suggesting white boys de center themselves in this argument. I get that people think that’s lefty ditz stuff - but it’s actually a real piece of advice. People in positions of privilege often think that things apply to them when they do not. The messages about girls’ empowerment have nothing to do with OP’s sons. Telling them “this is not about you, here’s what it’s about” should help them to not feel persecuted by a tshirt. Ongoing conversations are incredibly important so that they can put the stuff they see in context - whether they agree with it or not. Not everything you see and have an emotional response to us about you. Not everything should be treated as though it’s about you. It’s not a ditzy leftist thing to say.

What I have largely seen from people saying “ditzy leftists shouldn’t be the only ones teaching kids about this stuff” is that they disagree with my views on this issue and tend to communicate it by being personally insulting, like above.


Oh don’t be personally insulted! Just decenter yourself. That wasn’t about you.


I didn’t say I was insulted. I said your kind uses personal insults when they disagree with people’s views.

I have also never heard the word “ditzy” applied to a male, so that seems like a personal insult specifically intended to devalue an opinion you disagree with, in a sexist way. There are plenty of words to imply that someone is stupid. That one just means “stupid WOMAN.” Patriarchy showing through loud and clear.


It mainly is women trying to police this stuff, though … And the women tend to have extremely shallow and confused views about it.


Do you hear your own misogyny?! Seriously? I’m neither shallow nor confused on this issue. You just disagree with me, and your way of doing that is to saying “women are shallow and confused.”

There are actual social issues in the world and representation is one of them. The backlash against diverse representation by white moms in defense of their white sons is unnecessary. If OP’s sons feel marginalized by shirts boosting the awesomeness of girls, she could choose to respond to them validating their current perspective, explaining the history of the problem, and providing new perspective (“this is not about boys not being awesome, there are plenty of ways for you to feel awesome other than a snarky shirt, etc.”).

I agree that the gendered power shirts are stupid and that they never come in boy power the same way they don’t come in white power - privileged groups of people do not need support in representation the same way that marginalized people do.

But I guess I’m a shallow confused woman, a ditzy leftist. Maybe I should just let my husband have the opinions, since his perspectives are guaranteed to be deeper and less confused because he is male?


No, I actually think you are shallow and confused if you think lecturing boys to “decenter themselves” is the way to address this issue. I think you are 100% engaged in a type of speech that you believe is virtuous, and you have no understanding or interest in how children’s minds actually work. I also think your are fully ignorant about the way boys are disadvantaged compared to girls, and in your zeal to be an ally, you forget that it’s actually black boys who have it worst.

In short I think your uniformed, hackneyed, and hypocritical viewpoint is worse than any actual anti-girl rhetoric that may still be out there.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know , OP, but my son complained that his elementary school has a “girls on the run” club but no running club for boys that he could join. And he wants to join!

He also asked me why the gym has a big “girls rule” sign in it and no boys rule sign. The sign is actually from the the girls
On the run club so it goes hand in hand with his other complaint I guess. I also had a hard time with these questions and actually encouraged him to ask to join the girls on the run club because he was absolutely correct. But, he was nervous to so he didn’t. For reference he is a rising 2nd grader.


As a woman, you should be able to have these conversations with your sons openly. Historically girls were not encouraged to participate in sports, and in fact, they weren’t allowed to. Title IV! These clubs are around to encourage girls to do things that historically they were not allowed to do. Easy answer.


That’s what I tried to do and his response was “so now boys aren’t allowed to, because when grandma was little, girls weren’t allowed to?” I mean he is 7. A sports club that exists only for one gender - without a club for the other gender- at a public school wasn’t ok then and it’s not ok now.


Boys are allowed to join girls on the run.


Boys are not allowed to create a Boys on the run club. Girls on the run is more of a mentorship fellowship club for girls than a running club. Can you imagine trying to create a fellowship club for elementary school boys only?


Until there’s an equal percentage of boys and girls in certain activities there’s no need for boys to have a boys only club 🙄


You clearly don’t have young boys. The elementary schools 1000% cater to girls , and girls strengths, in our region. Boys learning styles are largely ignored and things like yearbook club, school newspaper, class president- it’s almost all girls. Which is great for those girls. It is. But pretending that the boys are just fine and in no need of similar mentorship or gender-based guidance is a mistake.

The staff in elementary schools is overwhelmingly female, thanks to traditional gender roles. The majority of PTA volunteers are female, thanks to traditional gender roles. Girls on the Run was created by a mom specifically to empower girls, thanks to traditional gender roles. When girls couldn’t join Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts were created. Parents of boys don’t have a legitimate complaint here unless they are willing to do the work of creating and volunteering for niche clubs for boys or gender neutral clubs that cater to their sons’ interests. That’s how the world works. Have boy parents lobbied for more popular activities? Our elementary school had a chess club, foreign language clubs, computer programming clubs.


Boy scouts was created in 1910 and Girl scouts in 1912. No one involved in creating either organization is still alive today.
Anonymous
I have not read the 8000 posts on this but girls are NOT wearing shirts that say girls are better than boys. #boymoms are just being babies.
Anonymous
I say girls and boys are equal. But historically women weren’t treated equal so there are still people who want to make that clear.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I have not read the 8000 posts on this but girls are NOT wearing shirts that say girls are better than boys. #boymoms are just being babies.


To be clear - it’s people like this who are the problem and this is the whole problem right here.

That said we tell are kids not to be victims.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Tell them it used to be that girls were often to,d they couldn’t do things and that these shirts are someone’s idea of correcting that. You could also tell them that you’re not wild about the shirts because they also create the message the boys are getting, so you won’t buy the shirts, but it’s important to recognize when points being made about history are legitimate, even if they are misguided.


Perfect response.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Your sons need a sister.


My boys have a sister. I would never allow her to wear a shirt that suggests girls are better than boys. She loves her favorite daughter shirt though…


NP. There aren’t mass market shirts that say “girls are better than boys”. As every sane PP has already pointed out, OP’s son is misinterpreting something like “girl power” or “girls rule”. Saying that something is good is not equivalent to calling something else bad.
Anonymous
Poor little boys. They'll never amount to anything. A boy will never be chosen to be president or CEO of a major corporation over a woman just because of his sex. Never ever. Poor little boys.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know , OP, but my son complained that his elementary school has a “girls on the run” club but no running club for boys that he could join. And he wants to join!

He also asked me why the gym has a big “girls rule” sign in it and no boys rule sign. The sign is actually from the the girls
On the run club so it goes hand in hand with his other complaint I guess. I also had a hard time with these questions and actually encouraged him to ask to join the girls on the run club because he was absolutely correct. But, he was nervous to so he didn’t. For reference he is a rising 2nd grader.


As a woman, you should be able to have these conversations with your sons openly. Historically girls were not encouraged to participate in sports, and in fact, they weren’t allowed to. Title IV! These clubs are around to encourage girls to do things that historically they were not allowed to do. Easy answer.


That’s what I tried to do and his response was “so now boys aren’t allowed to, because when grandma was little, girls weren’t allowed to?” I mean he is 7. A sports club that exists only for one gender - without a club for the other gender- at a public school wasn’t ok then and it’s not ok now.


Boys are allowed to join girls on the run.


Boys are not allowed to create a Boys on the run club. Girls on the run is more of a mentorship fellowship club for girls than a running club. Can you imagine trying to create a fellowship club for elementary school boys only?


Until there’s an equal percentage of boys and girls in certain activities there’s no need for boys to have a boys only club 🙄


You clearly don’t have young boys. The elementary schools 1000% cater to girls , and girls strengths, in our region. Boys learning styles are largely ignored and things like yearbook club, school newspaper, class president- it’s almost all girls. Which is great for those girls. It is. But pretending that the boys are just fine and in no need of similar mentorship or gender-based guidance is a mistake.

The staff in elementary schools is overwhelmingly female, thanks to traditional gender roles. The majority of PTA volunteers are female, thanks to traditional gender roles. Girls on the Run was created by a mom specifically to empower girls, thanks to traditional gender roles. When girls couldn’t join Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts were created. Parents of boys don’t have a legitimate complaint here unless they are willing to do the work of creating and volunteering for niche clubs for boys or gender neutral clubs that cater to their sons’ interests. That’s how the world works. Have boy parents lobbied for more popular activities? Our elementary school had a chess club, foreign language clubs, computer programming clubs.


In this day and age of cancellation, what parent will stand up and advocate for Boys on the Run?

I doubt you could create such a blatant copycat that you call it Boys on the Run, but if you want to create an after school program called Running Rangers, where kids wear camouflage t-shirts and focus on self discipline, personal growth, physical fitness, mental toughness, and spend time talking about the issues they face, their emotional needs, self esteem, and appropriate ways to express emotion, you can market it as an alternative to Girls on the Run. As long as you allow girls, just as they allow boys, I think you’d be fine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Your sons need a sister.


My boys have a sister. I would never allow her to wear a shirt that suggests girls are better than boys. She loves her favorite daughter shirt though…


NP. There aren’t mass market shirts that say “girls are better than boys”. As every sane PP has already pointed out, OP’s son is misinterpreting something like “girl power” or “girls rule”. Saying that something is good is not equivalent to calling something else bad.


No - the boys are reacting to the fact that they know they would never be allowed to wear a “boys rule” shirt
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know , OP, but my son complained that his elementary school has a “girls on the run” club but no running club for boys that he could join. And he wants to join!

He also asked me why the gym has a big “girls rule” sign in it and no boys rule sign. The sign is actually from the the girls
On the run club so it goes hand in hand with his other complaint I guess. I also had a hard time with these questions and actually encouraged him to ask to join the girls on the run club because he was absolutely correct. But, he was nervous to so he didn’t. For reference he is a rising 2nd grader.


As a woman, you should be able to have these conversations with your sons openly. Historically girls were not encouraged to participate in sports, and in fact, they weren’t allowed to. Title IV! These clubs are around to encourage girls to do things that historically they were not allowed to do. Easy answer.


That’s what I tried to do and his response was “so now boys aren’t allowed to, because when grandma was little, girls weren’t allowed to?” I mean he is 7. A sports club that exists only for one gender - without a club for the other gender- at a public school wasn’t ok then and it’s not ok now.


Boys are allowed to join girls on the run.


Boys are not allowed to create a Boys on the run club. Girls on the run is more of a mentorship fellowship club for girls than a running club. Can you imagine trying to create a fellowship club for elementary school boys only?


Until there’s an equal percentage of boys and girls in certain activities there’s no need for boys to have a boys only club 🙄


You clearly don’t have young boys. The elementary schools 1000% cater to girls , and girls strengths, in our region. Boys learning styles are largely ignored and things like yearbook club, school newspaper, class president- it’s almost all girls. Which is great for those girls. It is. But pretending that the boys are just fine and in no need of similar mentorship or gender-based guidance is a mistake.

The staff in elementary schools is overwhelmingly female, thanks to traditional gender roles. The majority of PTA volunteers are female, thanks to traditional gender roles. Girls on the Run was created by a mom specifically to empower girls, thanks to traditional gender roles. When girls couldn’t join Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts were created. Parents of boys don’t have a legitimate complaint here unless they are willing to do the work of creating and volunteering for niche clubs for boys or gender neutral clubs that cater to their sons’ interests. That’s how the world works. Have boy parents lobbied for more popular activities? Our elementary school had a chess club, foreign language clubs, computer programming clubs.


In this day and age of cancellation, what parent will stand up and advocate for Boys on the Run?

I doubt you could create such a blatant copycat that you call it Boys on the Run, but if you want to create an after school program called Running Rangers, where kids wear camouflage t-shirts and focus on self discipline, personal growth, physical fitness, mental toughness, and spend time talking about the issues they face, their emotional needs, self esteem, and appropriate ways to express emotion, you can market it as an alternative to Girls on the Run. As long as you allow girls, just as they allow boys, I think you’d be fine.


What if I - gasp - just want my kid to have access to a running after school activity, unecumbered by any ideology?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Your sons need a sister.


My boys have a sister. I would never allow her to wear a shirt that suggests girls are better than boys. She loves her favorite daughter shirt though…


NP. There aren’t mass market shirts that say “girls are better than boys”. As every sane PP has already pointed out, OP’s son is misinterpreting something like “girl power” or “girls rule”. Saying that something is good is not equivalent to calling something else bad.


No - the boys are reacting to the fact that they know they would never be allowed to wear a “boys rule” shirt


And why isn’t there a WHITE History Month, amirite?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Your sons need a sister.


My boys have a sister. I would never allow her to wear a shirt that suggests girls are better than boys. She loves her favorite daughter shirt though…


NP. There aren’t mass market shirts that say “girls are better than boys”. As every sane PP has already pointed out, OP’s son is misinterpreting something like “girl power” or “girls rule”. Saying that something is good is not equivalent to calling something else bad.


No - the boys are reacting to the fact that they know they would never be allowed to wear a “boys rule” shirt


And why isn’t there a WHITE History Month, amirite?


That's just you, friend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Your sons need a sister.


My boys have a sister. I would never allow her to wear a shirt that suggests girls are better than boys. She loves her favorite daughter shirt though…


NP. There aren’t mass market shirts that say “girls are better than boys”. As every sane PP has already pointed out, OP’s son is misinterpreting something like “girl power” or “girls rule”. Saying that something is good is not equivalent to calling something else bad.


No - the boys are reacting to the fact that they know they would never be allowed to wear a “boys rule” shirt


And why isn’t there a WHITE History Month, amirite?


So you have a choice: maintain your smug superiority and sense of virtue; or actually “do the work” (as they say) of understanding how kids think and process. If your goal is to show how percectly orthodox you are in your social justice speech - congrats. If your goal is to raise kids with good values - you’re a failure.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Your sons need a sister.


My boys have a sister. I would never allow her to wear a shirt that suggests girls are better than boys. She loves her favorite daughter shirt though…


NP. There aren’t mass market shirts that say “girls are better than boys”. As every sane PP has already pointed out, OP’s son is misinterpreting something like “girl power” or “girls rule”. Saying that something is good is not equivalent to calling something else bad.


No - the boys are reacting to the fact that they know they would never be allowed to wear a “boys rule” shirt


And why isn’t there a WHITE History Month, amirite?


So you have a choice: maintain your smug superiority and sense of virtue; or actually “do the work” (as they say) of understanding how kids think and process. If your goal is to show how percectly orthodox you are in your social justice speech - congrats. If your goal is to raise kids with good values - you’re a failure.


I’m raising a son who doesn’t fall to pieces when his sister competes in Girls on the Run, so we’re all set, thanks 👍
post reply Forum Index » Elementary School-Aged Kids
Message Quick Reply
Go to: