Overdressed and status symbols

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Basic umc starter pack:
Golden goose sneakers
Goyard bag
Cartier love bracelets (multiple metals, diamond one for 10 year anniversary)
Stations necklace
Stupid GG belt
Expensive highlights

It's just the trends of the day, nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.

I spend a relative lot on my appearance, but cannot imagine wearing any of this. It seems very “middle school”. I buy what suits me and what I deem “well designed”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Van Cleef Alhambra is very pretty. It has been around for a long time. I remember seeing it 10+ years ago and liked it then. I am surprised it is still being purchased. The Cartier love bracelets are kind of ugly. But a lot of Cartier jewelry is ugly. Every now and then they have some really pretty stuff.

I had to google the Cartier bracelets to see what they are. Agree that they are not very attractive!

They are stunning. In particular, this one:

Gross. Trypophobia inducing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Van Cleef Alhambra is very pretty. It has been around for a long time. I remember seeing it 10+ years ago and liked it then. I am surprised it is still being purchased. The Cartier love bracelets are kind of ugly. But a lot of Cartier jewelry is ugly. Every now and then they have some really pretty stuff.

I had to google the Cartier bracelets to see what they are. Agree that they are not very attractive!

They are stunning. In particular, this one:

You are calling it “stunning” because you think you have to like what your friends like. The truth is that’s it’s mass produced, rather boring and not very pretty. It’s made for people who are followers and not at all original.

[Anonymous]

I get my apparel from the famed French fashion house of Wálmárt and their Italian counterpart, Il Cóstçó.

[Anonymous]

I'm in Europe now and everyone wears stacked cartier bracelets, with at least one love. It's not overdressed, it's just fashion. I'm not seeing a lot of VCA but a ton of Hermes, especially collier de chien.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basic umc starter pack:
Golden goose sneakers
Goyard bag
Cartier love bracelets (multiple metals, diamond one for 10 year anniversary)
Stations necklace
Stupid GG belt
Expensive highlights

It's just the trends of the day, nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.

I love everything on this list except the Golden goose sneakers (they're fine but just not me anymore). I'd add a Bottega Jodie. And anything VanCleef is gorgeous.

All of that together is too much. Doesn't mean the wearer is a bad person or should be judged. But yes, overkill. It's ones who dress over the top in and in a pretentious manner and judge others who are not conspicuously brand conscious that are the worst.

What are you talking about? I have nice jewelry from my family and I wear them all the time. Not all of us grew up in a trailer in West Virginia and buy things to impress neighbors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basic umc starter pack:
Golden goose sneakers
Goyard bag
Cartier love bracelets (multiple metals, diamond one for 10 year anniversary)
Stations necklace
Stupid GG belt
Expensive highlights

It's just the trends of the day, nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.

I love everything on this list except the Golden goose sneakers (they're fine but just not me anymore). I'd add a Bottega Jodie. And anything VanCleef is gorgeous.

All of that together is too much. Doesn't mean the wearer is a bad person or should be judged. But yes, overkill. It's ones who dress over the top in and in a pretentious manner and judge others who are not conspicuously brand conscious that are the worst.

What are you talking about? I have nice jewelry from my family and I wear them all the time. Not all of us grew up in a trailer in West Virginia and buy things to impress neighbors.

I'm talking about people who look down on those for not dressing up. I like to dress up too and like you have, family pieces. But I don't judge those who don't have the latest chanel purse, etc. just as I don't judge those who want wear the latest of everything all at once

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the Van Cleef Alhambra is very pretty. It has been around for a long time. I remember seeing it 10+ years ago and liked it then. I am surprised it is still being purchased. The Cartier love bracelets are kind of ugly. But a lot of Cartier jewelry is ugly. Every now and then they have some really pretty stuff.

I had to google the Cartier bracelets to see what they are. Agree that they are not very attractive!

They are stunning. In particular, this one:

You are calling it “stunning” because you think you have to like what your friends like. The truth is that’s it’s mass produced, rather boring and not very pretty. It’s made for people who are followers and not at all original.

I think PP is entitled to her opinion that it’s stunning, and you are entitled to your opinion that it’s not. But please acknowledge that it’s just that - opinions - and you have no idea how “original” a person is simply because her whose view differs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basic umc starter pack:
Golden goose sneakers
Goyard bag
Cartier love bracelets (multiple metals, diamond one for 10 year anniversary)
Stations necklace
Stupid GG belt
Expensive highlights

It's just the trends of the day, nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.

I love everything on this list except the Golden goose sneakers (they're fine but just not me anymore). I'd add a Bottega Jodie. And anything VanCleef is gorgeous.

All of that together is too much. Doesn't mean the wearer is a bad person or should be judged. But yes, overkill. It's ones who dress over the top in and in a pretentious manner and judge others who are not conspicuously brand conscious that are the worst.

What are you talking about? I have nice jewelry from my family and I wear them all the time. Not all of us grew up in a trailer in West Virginia and buy things to impress neighbors.

What is so wrong about growing up poor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basic umc starter pack:
Golden goose sneakers
Goyard bag
Cartier love bracelets (multiple metals, diamond one for 10 year anniversary)
Stations necklace
Stupid GG belt
Expensive highlights

It's just the trends of the day, nothing to get your panties in a bunch about.

I love everything on this list except the Golden goose sneakers (they're fine but just not me anymore). I'd add a Bottega Jodie. And anything VanCleef is gorgeous.

All of that together is too much. Doesn't mean the wearer is a bad person or should be judged. But yes, overkill. It's ones who dress over the top in and in a pretentious manner and judge others who are not conspicuously brand conscious that are the worst.

What are you talking about? I have nice jewelry from my family and I wear them all the time. Not all of us grew up in a trailer in West Virginia and buy things to impress neighbors.

What is so wrong about growing up poor?

+1000

First PP—you get the award for telling everyone you’re a bad person in shockingly few words

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who have style wear what they like and what makes them feel good. And they don't care what you or anyone else thinks. If you think they look flashy? They do not care, because they wear what they like. If you think they look demure? Same. If you think they look tasteful (or not)...same. They also aren't judging you either, because they're comfortable in their own skin, and clothes, and whatever else. Being secure in yourself is always in style.

I'm a mom with NO style, and I don't really care either. If you want to roll with your Cartier bracelets, I am totally okay with it as long as you don't judge me for my basic, thrifty apparel. After all, I couldn't afford private school tuition otherwise. In fact, I probably wouldn't recognize a Cartier bracelet if it hit me in the face. Please try not to be offended if I ask you whether you got it from Target.

This crowd is not going to be happy with you. VC and A and Cartier are worn for the purpose of the wearer saying "I can afford to spend 5 figures on my casual jewelry."

I wear VC&A and it certainly isn’t to send a message to anyone. It makes you sound terribly insecure that you assume as much. That’s the only reason you’d ever buy expensive jewelry? To broadcast to me that you can?

DP: I think PP's is responding to those who cannot seem to comprehend that many of us don't pay attention to fashion, don't know these brand names, and wouldn't know if what you were wearing came from Target or Tiffany's. That's not insecurity, it is lack of interest. Fashion isn't everyone's hobby. So the PPs (contrary to OP) are saying to those who expect everyone to recognize the pieces as OP does, we don't recognize it. That's all.

[Anonymous]

I think of love bracelets as a pretty classic staple, just like any other gold bangle. Mine belonged to my mom and I wear it with my timex.

[Anonymous]

When our DD was at a private she became friends with parents we discovered were low key billionaires. (They took her on vacation.). Heirs to an extremely large fortune but lived in an attached small row home. Really cool people who flew far under the radar of the folks in development. Was quite amusing actually. In a million years you would’ve never guessed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pretty rare in the DC area. People here think it’s sophisticated and “old money” to dress in the most boring clothes and jewelry imaginable. Anything trendy is dismissed as “new money” or trashy.

old money means wasp. White Anglo saxon protestants. No as a rule they are not flashy. They also do not really exist anymore outside of some areas of New England.

Nah they are allllll over DC.

DC Wasps are boring and inbred looking. I love a good fashion show at back to school night. If you’ve got it, flaunt it.

- not a wasp nor have the income to be an on trend mom at Beauvoir

[Anonymous]

There are still descendants of the former Hope Diamond owner around DC (McLeans not Winston), imagine THAT showing up to school!