Um, are you saying we are designating Lewis as low income? That's not the way this works, that's not how any of this works. |
They have smaller classroom sizes. So if they were near their full design capacity they’d end up with trailers or modulars. |
Not dragging her. Saying the history of Lewis in recent years has been at odds with Reid’s mantra. Maybe it will demonstrate over time, though, whether she has plans or just slogans. |
No, I am not designating Lewis anything. But aren't they a Title I school? Title I schools are supposed to have smaller classes. |
FCPS only has Title I elementary schools. But the high schools with more poor kids have considerably smaller class sizes. If the suggestion is that poorer kids benefit from smaller classes, of course. But if the total school enrollment is low, that means kids have access to fewer courses and it tends over time to further concentrate poverty at those schools. |
Lewis is close to double many of the Catholic high school enrollment. It is 30% larger than some of the strong public high schools I have taught at in other states. FCPS needs to switch Lewis from IB to AP. That school being IB is a huge turn off for military families who need the flexibility of AP and its a la carte structure. |
You have to replace this School Board next year for that to happen. They are all limousine liberals with guilty consciences. Keeping IB at Lewis makes them feel good because IB has a lot of feel-good phrases like making students "life-long learners" and "global citizens." And it's also more expensive than AP, so they have something else to point to as evidence that they spend more on poorer schools. Whether it actually serves the school community or incentivizes families to look elsewhere or buy in the Lewis district and then pupil place to other schools concerns them very little. |
Why do you care so much? I swear the people who constantly bring up Lewis on DCUM (and target WSHS in the process) are people who live in areas zoned for Lewis and are resentful. |
People who get screwed again and again do tend to build up some resentment. Not sure why you would expect something different. |
If the classes are smaller, then they will offer more classes than if the class sizes were typical. The problem arises when the students don’t take the variety of classes that is available at other schools. |
Oh, please. |
It seems like FCPS ought to pay more attention to both the schools that have been overcrowded for years as well as to those that have been under-enrolled. They don't, so they get called out, and then people like you get worked up about it. And it's not lost on some of us that the former head of FCPS Facilities went to West Springfield, oversaw a very nice renovation and expansion of that school, and neglected issues at many other schools. |
So, there won't be any resentment if some WS students are rezoned to Lewis. Good to hear. |
Weren't there adjustments to the Springfield magisterial district that supposedly were intended to protect Democrats if Laura Jane Cohen and her colleagues moved part of West Springfield to Lewis? |
New poster. Owning a house that you purchased at $100,000-$200.000 less than houses in a neighboring district knowing perfectly well that the price was lower due to a lower performing high school, is very different than paying a premium and sacrificing things like space for a house zoned for a specific school, then losing $100,000-$200,000 or more in equity, overnight, perhaps putting your house under water, if your house gets rezoned to one of the lowest rated schools in FCPS. Especially since rezoning a neighborhood will make zero impact on Lewis' ranking, as many of those kids will find a way to not attend Lewis using the AP/IB loophole, or a language not offered at Lewis, or Catholic school. The only thing rezoning a neighborhood out of Lewis will do is bring down the property values in a significant way for the neighborhood rezoned. |