The Laptop

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

Again: where is the President's involvement in this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

“Trying” to do
Ok
How about we focus on what the Trumps actually did.
I’d like to see some scrutiny where we know there is malfeasance.
That might take some time. We can move onto Hunter after Ivanka’s Chinese patents have been investigated.
And after we look into Jared’s park ave bailout.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

“Trying” to do
Ok
How about we focus on what the Trumps actually did.
I’d like to see some scrutiny where we know there is malfeasance.
That might take some time. We can move onto Hunter after Ivanka’s Chinese patents have been investigated.
And after we look into Jared’s park ave bailout.

So if one person does it, it’s ok for others?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

“Trying” to do
Ok
How about we focus on what the Trumps actually did.
I’d like to see some scrutiny where we know there is malfeasance.
That might take some time. We can move onto Hunter after Ivanka’s Chinese patents have been investigated.
And after we look into Jared’s park ave bailout.

So if one person does it, it’s ok for others?

What has he done? Be specific. Because we know Ivanka scored dozens on patents. And we know Jared got bailed out for his building with middle eastern money.
We know those things happened. And they happened on our dime and at our expense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

Again: where is the President's involvement in this?

In the laptops. I think it was laptop #12 the Inspiron 15 3000 with the apple hard drive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

I don't see a crime there. What law is broken? I mean, glad to hear they were not bringing the VP into it.

[Anonymous]

I totally believe everything this guy has to say. He seems so authentic. He's making the RWNJ media instead of having a job now. Oh. He tried to sue Twitter for $50 million but it was dismissed.





https://nypost.com/2020/12/28/computer-repairman-in-hunter-biden-laptop-scandal-sues-twitter/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

Someone already answered you, but this is something you should know yourself. A little bit of intellectual curiosity would do you well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

Someone already answered you, but this is something you should know yourself. A little bit of intellectual curiosity would do you well

If you had anything to say you would have said it when asked directly. You’ve got NOTHING!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

Someone already answered you, but this is something you should know yourself. A little bit of intellectual curiosity would do you well

If you had anything to say you would have said it when asked directly. You’ve got NOTHING!

I got two laptops and a microphone!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

“Trying” to do
Ok
How about we focus on what the Trumps actually did.
I’d like to see some scrutiny where we know there is malfeasance.
That might take some time. We can move onto Hunter after Ivanka’s Chinese patents have been investigated.
And after we look into Jared’s park ave bailout.

So if one person does it, it’s ok for others?

We have proof of Jared using the instruments of the US government to extort another country into a personal billion dollar bailout. Where is there proof of the Bidens doing anything close?

[Anonymous]

There's a laptop a little up the road
From the Ukraine and Fox News we know
A place we saw the lights turn low
The jig-saw jazz and the get-fresh flow

Pulling out the lies and Giuliani‘s handouts
Two laptops and a microphone
Bottles and cans just clap your hands
Just clap your hands

Where it's at!
I got two laptops and a microphone
Where it's at!
I got two laptops and a microphone
Where it's at!
I got two laptops and a microphone
Where it's at!

[Anonymous]

You'll say, "We've got nothing in the laptops
No common ground to start from"
And it’s falling apart
You'll say, "The BLM has come between us
Jan 6th has come between us"
Still I know you just don't care
And I said, "What about The laptops at Tiffany's?"
She said, "I think I remember it as fake"
And as I recall I think we both kind of Agreed
And I said, "Well that's the one thing we've got"

[Anonymous]

We know that the Democrats and media knew that this laptop was authentic and that this was a legitimate story from the start.

But, the surfacing of this story at the time was really inconvenient for Democrats because it would call attention to the possible corruption of the Biden family.
And, they couldn't have that because it would risk Joe losing the election.

So, Big Tech partnered with the Democrats to suppress the story. They banned anyone from even mentioning the story. The New York Post was banned from Twitter for over a week for publishing the story. Likewise with other platforms.

And, then.... to put a cherry on top, over 50 FORMER national security officials published a letter claiming the laptop was Russian disinformation. Yet they had ZERO evidence of this. They even stated that in their letter, but that didn't matter to the Democrats, the media and Big Tech. (“We do not know if the emails . . . are genuine or not,” the letter said. They’re just “suspicious.”) The letter was all the left needed to start promoting this narrative.

And, boy did they ever...... from nearly every MSM media outlet to Psaki to Biden himself......they all claimed this was Russian disinformation. They all got the memo.

And, now that Biden has been elected president, the NYT finally sees fit to confirm the authenticity of this story. Nothing to risk anymore. And, I would argue that the NYT sees that the public does not support Biden and they are starting their campaign to force him into not running in 2024. They need a new candidate. (Watch to see who they start promoting on the Democratic side)

Will the media, the Democrats, and Big Tech issue a mea culpa regarding this story? Hell no. No admission of being wrong. No apologies for their actions. Radio silence from the MSM and left-wing media (the NYT story got ZERO air time on these networks). Psaki will not comment - referring reporters to the DOJ and Hunter's legal team even though she didn't hesitate to address the original story and call it Russian disinformation when this story first broke. How convenient. And, those former intelligence officials? Nope. Either "no comment" or in the case of James Clapper, they are doubling down on their false claims. And, we know we can believe James Clapper, right? After all, he never lies does he......https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-11-17/lawmakers-resume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is not what's on the laptop itself, though that's pretty bad. The problem is that there was a media blackout and an outright campaign to call anyone a liar, ban, etc. when even trying to discuss it. That was to protect Biden's candidacy and was flat out wrong.

What's bad about what is on the laptop? Please be specific.

At a minimum there were emails between Biden family members talking about cashing in on Biden's VP status to rake in the money for the family, with references to Biden himself and at least one email discussing how they needed to keep the conversation "clean" by being careful not to directly copy Biden etc cetera.

In short, the Bidens were trying to do what the Democrats accused the Trump clan of doing...

“Trying” to do
Ok
How about we focus on what the Trumps actually did.
I’d like to see some scrutiny where we know there is malfeasance.
That might take some time. We can move onto Hunter after Ivanka’s Chinese patents have been investigated.
And after we look into Jared’s park ave bailout.

So if one person does it, it’s ok for others?

Let’s be specific: Jared and Ivanka were government employees. Using their government positions and influence was wildly unethical and *illegal.*. It also implicated Trump, who hired them.

Aside from the president, none of the Bidens are government officials paid with tax money. Trying to use their proximity to their father to their benefit is wrong, but not illegal, and does not necessarily implicate the President.