|
The University reviewed data from five years of test-optional admissions and “found that academic performance at Princeton was stronger for students who chose to submit test scores than for students who did not,” the announcement said. |
|
Except for a few top names, they will all move in this direction.
Our school CCs have been telling us this is where the wind was blowing for awhile. University leaders and faculty and board want this. Individual AOs were happy with TO because it made their judgment more important and gave them a lot of pride in the art of their job of picking and shaping a class. AOs liked the individual discretion, but other senior admin did not. |
| Awesome! Poor, poor David Coleman only makes $1.8 million in salary as president of the College Board. We need to help his fledging organization by making the smartest students in the country take exams that are beneath them. |
| Damn. Now my kid won't get into Princeton. |
Chicago, Columbia, and Vandy will stick to TO. |
|
Look the reality is that most of our kids and most of us parents hate taking and preparing for this one-day stressful test. But it does add value. I'm happy it's becoming the norm again to mandate testing.
The schools that will use test scores as one criteria for admission already did this for decades pre-covid. So this isn't some big ideological leap. Going TO temporarily was and I think it negatively impacted college admissions process and added to anxiety and hysteria. If anything, going test required again will bring SAT scores back down to earth. It's really hard to get a combined SAT score north of 1500 so I'll be happy when scores in the 1400's become the new standard for top schools again. |
| Remember the poster who use to insist that test optional was forever on every thread? Seems she finally got the message. |
Scor3s will continue to be high due to superscoring. The digital tests are shorter so easier for kids to take multiple times. |
Agree |
agreed. some kids have been taking the SAT up to 5 times just to chase the mythical 1500 score! it's such a waste of time if 1450 can be seen as a top score again. |
Shocking /s |
| yay! go princeton! |
| The digital test is less consistent than the paper one. So yes, multiple retakes are more beneficial than they were only a few years ago. With the paper test, scores went up over time due to an increase in academic skills. With the digital test, that can happen too, or maybe you get a lower score than a year before. There is a lot of luck in what questions you get on test day and either the equating process doesn't seem to be accurately capturing weight/difficulty or the adaptive nature of which section 2 one gets is way off. |
The poster is now insisting that test optional is forever for SLACs. Let's see if test required stops at CMC. |