The point is the UN said their piece and certified it, despite Israel being in Shebaa Farms. |
If the UN considers it Syria, Israel considers it theirs, and Lebanon considers it theirs, then it sounds pretty much like it’s conflicted territory to me. So casting it as an unequivocally defensible act by Hezbollah to bomb there on 10/8 seems a little ridiculous. |
Go back and read. I never said that and I never implied that. It would be more accurate to say that Hezbollah fired into disputed or occupied territory, and Israel returned fire into Lebanon. But almost all the reporting out there since last week are not saying that and instead say Hezbollah started firing into Israel on 10/8. Which again, is only from the Israeli perspective. Reporting should not give only the Israeli view as if it is a fact. |
Fine. But it also isn’t true to say, as a PP did, that Hezbollah was defending itself. That’s just taking Lebanon’s view as though it’s fact. Syria could’ve just as easily retaliated, since it considers that Syrian territory. But they didn’t because they’re ultimately aligned with Hezbollah. |
FFS, why are you even indulging this mouth breather with "Lebanon and Syria think it belongs to Syria" talk? It's NOT Israel. It's Syrian land. International law dictates that it's not Israel's land, nor will it ever be recognized by the international community as part of Israel. Next! |
Sounds like it also won’t ever be considered Lebanese land. So Hezbollah can’t have been justified in striking Shebaa Farms, under your logic. |
But the disconnect seems to be that Israel is not just "attacking a terrorist group and killing their members" they are killing many regular Lebanese citizens who are causing no immediate (or even past) threat. That is murder. I give you that Hezbollah's charter is terrible but I don't understand why it is so hard to see that Israel's actions are also terrible. It's like if the PLO attacked to kill a settler in the West Bank who attacked a Palestinian, but blew up the entire apartment complex where that settler lived. Would that be ok? |
Hezbollah is a non-state entity, right? They don’t represent Lebanon. Regardless, Israel has no legitimate right to respond to military acts that don’t involve their own territory, or even that involve their own citizens on foreign soil. Doing so means THEY initiated acts of war by responding with rocket and mission activity into Lebanon, and they should be treated by the U.S. like we treat Russian incursions into Ukraine, no different. |
Comparing Hezbollah to Ukraine is ridiculous. Hezbollah’s entire goal is to destroy Israel. They’ve targeted Israel incessantly, including during ceasefire periods. In contrast, Ukraine has done absolutely nothing to provoke Russia. |
It’s not so simple either way. Yes Hezbollah’s goal is to eliminate Israel. But Israel is attacking Lebanon not just Hezbollah. |
And Hezbollah’s rockets are indiscriminate. It goes both ways. |
Beirut attack ‘massive’: 6 residential buildings levelled to the ground
If this happened to Israel, it would be called a heinous and savage terror attack done by monsters. |
Israel needs to start being called a terror state. They’re in the terror yacht. Hezbollah is still on the raft |
Comparing Hezbollah rockets to Israel’s attacks is like comparing an arrow to an assault rifle |
Huh?? Hezbollah is massively well armed. |