MAGA teen bused in from a Catholic school harasses Indigenous People's marcher. Vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a perfect example of liberal bias, as demonstrated upon whom they choose to focus their condemnation. We have:

1) a group of black male adults, belonging to an organization labeled a hate group, yelling vile insults at white kids

2) we have a Native American adult male, antagonizing the white kids

3) we have white kids who, while smart enough not to tangle with the black males, feel safer (correctly) in holding their ground against the lone, older Narive American (who is far from an innocent bystander)

All the crititcism (by liberals) is focused on the white kids. The worst behavior, by far, is by the black adults. Shame on them.

I lean liberal, and I agree with everything you said. But, the fact is when you have a narcissistic racist in the white house who wears that stupid MAGA hat, inevitably some people are going to infer that other folks who wear the hat engage in the same behavior. Human nature.

I agree he is narcissistic, as are most of the people who have been president.
I disagree he is racist. It is an easy accusation to throw around.... happens way too frequently.
His actions and legislation just don't indicate racism.

And, those who show hatred toward those who wear MAGA hats are bigots.

There is narcissism and then there is narcissism that amounts to being a psychopath with zero empathy. I agree that all presidents are narcissists, but he is in his own zip code. You are right the term "racist" is an easy one to throw around - which is particularly problematic when you are trying to use the label for someone who truly is a racist. Maybe it's just his narcissism, but that's who he is. I disagree with your third point - his actions and his "legislation" prove that out. Your last point is a tough one - I don't dispute that people who show hatred to those who wear MAGA hats exhibit bigoted behavior. But fundamentally it's an issue of self-awareness - look at the guy who first wore the hat, right or wrong, you wear it you own it, at least to some extent. Bottom line is this man sows hatred and chaos in a way that no other president in my lifetime has. He is an embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Why does the social media mob hate guys with these particular boxes? Just bad luck? Or was the ill-will earned in some fashion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a perfect example of liberal bias, as demonstrated upon whom they choose to focus their condemnation. We have:

1) a group of black male adults, belonging to an organization labeled a hate group, yelling vile insults at white kids

2) we have a Native American adult male, antagonizing the white kids

3) we have white kids who, while smart enough not to tangle with the black males, feel safer (correctly) in holding their ground against the lone, older Narive American (who is far from an innocent bystander)

All the crititcism (by liberals) is focused on the white kids. The worst behavior, by far, is by the black adults. Shame on them.

Yep. You have to wonder.... why the misdirected negative targeting of these boys? (rhetorical question)

You have to wonder . . . why the rhetorical question instead of just stating your assertion (whatever it may be) outright?

Woah, now we have liberals questioning the form of a post, rather than addressing the content. Obvious you have no rebuttal.

My criticism goes like this, in order:

1) The Black Israelites, who are a black hate group against whites and Jews, spewing their venom
2) The Native American man, who was demonstrating the emotional maturity of an adolescent boy
3) The adolescent boys

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a perfect example of liberal bias, as demonstrated upon whom they choose to focus their condemnation. We have:

1) a group of black male adults, belonging to an organization labeled a hate group, yelling vile insults at white kids

2) we have a Native American adult male, antagonizing the white kids

3) we have white kids who, while smart enough not to tangle with the black males, feel safer (correctly) in holding their ground against the lone, older Narive American (who is far from an innocent bystander)

All the crititcism (by liberals) is focused on the white kids. The worst behavior, by far, is by the black adults. Shame on them.

Yep. You have to wonder.... why the misdirected negative targeting of these boys? (rhetorical question)

You have to wonder . . . why the rhetorical question instead of just stating your assertion (whatever it may be) outright?

Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Yup.
White? Check.
Male? Check
Christian? Check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a perfect example of liberal bias, as demonstrated upon whom they choose to focus their condemnation. We have:

1) a group of black male adults, belonging to an organization labeled a hate group, yelling vile insults at white kids

2) we have a Native American adult male, antagonizing the white kids

3) we have white kids who, while smart enough not to tangle with the black males, feel safer (correctly) in holding their ground against the lone, older Narive American (who is far from an innocent bystander)

All the crititcism (by liberals) is focused on the white kids. The worst behavior, by far, is by the black adults. Shame on them.

Yep. You have to wonder.... why the misdirected negative targeting of these boys? (rhetorical question)

You have to wonder . . . why the rhetorical question instead of just stating your assertion (whatever it may be) outright?

Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Yup.
White? Check.
Male? Check
Christian? Check.

And, the biggest of them all......Trump supporter? Check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And, the "unnecessary altercation" was actually caused by Mr. Phillips, who approached the group.
If he had remained in his own personal space, there would be no story.

This whole culture war could be avoided if people like Mr. Phillips would just stay in their places.

I'm going to take your comment as sarcastic.
He can go where he wants. Say what he wants. Sing what he wants. Drum what he wants.
But, if he approaches a group of students, stands at a close distance, drums and sings in their faces, he may just be instigating a confrontation.

Exactly. For him to say he was trying to help is ridiculous. Does anyone think those white boys were coming at the black men (beasts vs prey) in any way, much less in a predatory way? Like they had a death wish? Phillips “intervention” was totally unwarranted and for his own purposes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Yup.
White? Check.
Male? Check
Christian? Check.

No, the reason they are getting targeted is that they were acting like utter assholes. Can any parent here honestly say they'd want their kid acting like that? I hope not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Yup.
White? Check.
Male? Check
Christian? Check.

No, the reason they are getting targeted is that they were acting like utter assholes. Can any parent here honestly say they'd want their kid acting like that? I hope not.

Sure.
And, that is why most of the media has not focused at all on the Black Israelites or bothered to question and fact check the account of the incident given by Nathan Phillips.

Rest easy though. There are some media organizations taking care of that fact check. You probably won't see it though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a perfect example of liberal bias, as demonstrated upon whom they choose to focus their condemnation. We have:

1) a group of black male adults, belonging to an organization labeled a hate group, yelling vile insults at white kids

2) we have a Native American adult male, antagonizing the white kids

3) we have white kids who, while smart enough not to tangle with the black males, feel safer (correctly) in holding their ground against the lone, older Narive American (who is far from an innocent bystander)

All the crititcism (by liberals) is focused on the white kids. The worst behavior, by far, is by the black adults. Shame on them.

Yep. You have to wonder.... why the misdirected negative targeting of these boys? (rhetorical question)

For been white males and Christian.
It's very disturbing that kids are targeted. It's not the first attack on conservative kids.

[Anonymous]

And, ICYMI - Covington Catholic is closed today because of security concerns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Yup.
White? Check.
Male? Check
Christian? Check.

No, the reason they are getting targeted is that they were acting like utter assholes. Can any parent here honestly say they'd want their kid acting like that? I hope not.

And the black men and the NA man,were acting like assholes, too. And they're the adults! But......those damn white boys, amirite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a perfect example of liberal bias, as demonstrated upon whom they choose to focus their condemnation. We have:

1) a group of black male adults, belonging to an organization labeled a hate group, yelling vile insults at white kids

2) we have a Native American adult male, antagonizing the white kids

3) we have white kids who, while smart enough not to tangle with the black males, feel safer (correctly) in holding their ground against the lone, older Narive American (who is far from an innocent bystander)

All the crititcism (by liberals) is focused on the white kids. The worst behavior, by far, is by the black adults. Shame on them.

Yep. You have to wonder.... why the misdirected negative targeting of these boys? (rhetorical question)

You have to wonder . . . why the rhetorical question instead of just stating your assertion (whatever it may be) outright?

Oh, I have stated my assertion several times. Bottom line: This group of students checks all the boxes needed to be targets of the social media mob.

Yup.
White? Check.
Male? Check
Christian? Check.

And, the biggest of them all......Trump supporter? Check.

Found the cross yet? No?

Such martyrs you MAGAts are. I bet they will make y'all saints.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
He clearly has very little experience with such elitist pigs. He was not prepared for a younger male to stand in defiance of an elder since that is not how they raise their children. Most of the boys stepped back.

And the boys had little experience dealing with bigoted blacks. Why is everyone focusing on the adolescent whites rather than the adult blacks who are full of hatred?
[Report Post]



You do know that many of those people are mentally ill, right? If you spend any time in DC, you understand that some of these people are "not right" in the head. I blame the chaperones for not prepping the kids before the trip. You can't talk to crazy and they should know that! Crazy is going to be crazy, but we expect more out of Catholic school kids and their chaperones. I don't know about the NA man, but he possibly wanted to prevent the kids from being harmed by the crazies . . . because he has been in DC a lot and knows they are crazy and would rather take the heat himself. Who knows. All I know is that the "Christian" kids need to be better prepared for these kinds of trips. They are too young to handle the big leagues. And the government is shut down as far as Park police go so they have to police themselves (or the chaperones do). And there is no need to wear provocative clothing (MAGA hats) during a very contentious period of time. I put the blame squarely on the chaperones and school for not understanding this. Yes, the kids are obnoxious, but they are the product of their parents and the school so are innocent victims as well.

You're still coming up with excuses for the bigoted and antagonizing behavior of the adults in the other two groups - and showing your own continuing bias.

Look, mentally ill is mentally ill. It's not an excuse. It's a reality. It's not like my dog ate my homework kind of excuse. It's real. If you live in a big city you see it all the time. All.the.time. You do not engage in any way, shape or form. The kids had chaperones that apparently did not understand this and should not have let them sing their school song or whatever. Should not have let them get near the other groups. We sort of expect the schools coming here to have mentally sane people in charge. Don't jump in the cage at the zoo, okay? And, yes, DC can be a zoo and if you didn't realize that, well, I can't help you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is another view at the lincoln memorial. https://twitter.com/i/status/1087484002863325185

ARe people really saying this whole display is justified because of what 5 BHI people said? These kids should never have been left unsupervised for a moment.

I think it’s adorable how many people are saying their teenage sons would stand by idly and be called vile names and not react in any way like the gentlemen they were raised to be. I highly doubt any of you actually have teenage sons. Be real.

I thought Catholic schools were supposed to instill different values in their students than other school, that their students were different and above the norm? Otherwise why spend the money t send them?

Everybody in the Catholic school community know sending your son to an all boys school like Covington... (aka Gonzaga/Prep) you are going to have to deal with this toxic type of behavior.

Many of us will not send our kids to all boys schools for this exact reason.

Seems to me they need to learn that they will deal with a toxic hatred of the students by other people.
At least, that is the impression I am getting on this site.

Yes. They will be met with hatred sometimes when they cat call an innocent woman walking down the street or when they hold a girld down on a bed and assaulting her or when they black face.

How do you think those actions should be met?

Maybe, at the bare minimum, the exact same way public school dealts with criminal misdemeanors.

[Anonymous]

If I had been caught in a racist mob while I was a teenager, my parents would have punished me rather than hiring a PR firm to defend me.