U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

Not PP, but there literally have been entire books written on this subject. Here's an entire book on the subject written 30 years ago: https://www.commentary.org/articles/joseph-adelson/illiberal-education-by-dinesh-dsouza/

[Anonymous]

LOL. Pushing RWNJ propaganda. Of course you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Pushing RWNJ propaganda. Of course you are.

NP here, not surprisingly, you are not attacking the facts and logic, but the person presenting the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Yea, racists rejoice.

Anti-racists.

Anti-racists are rejoicing, you must be livid.

It's the Trump tactic. Accuse your opponent of what you are.

Asra is pretty transparent of her leanings.

Yea, the "anti-racists" are using racist tactics, and they are indeed rejoicing. They get to be racist for a bit longer while claiming to be anti-racist.

Yeah. This forum has gotten unreadable from all of the social engineering tropes we see. From the guilt-by-association with advocacy groups, to the "everyone's on our side" rhetoric, to the chest-thumping bravado about arguments being destroyed. It's funny how if you wait long enough, all of their claims eventually get turned on their head.

Like, we went from "people opposing reform are racist," to seeing that the reform was objectively, legally racist.
We went from "merit-based testing disadvantages minorities," to seeing an MIT study that says that not using merit-based testing disadvantages minorities.
We went from "if you're opposing reforms, you're basking in While privilege," to finding out that Brabrand was the key figure in pushing the reforms while Vern Williams was openly skeptical of them.
We went from "the old admissions were sketchy because they didn't admit poor kids," to finding out that that the admissions questions about experience factors were highly dubious.

and so on.

The only thing unreadable is your post. I have no idea what you are trying to say.

NP here, you have reading comprehension problems, seek remedial lessons, they are now available at TJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

Not PP, but there literally have been entire books written on this subject. Here's an entire book on the subject written 30 years ago: https://www.commentary.org/articles/joseph-adelson/illiberal-education-by-dinesh-dsouza/

Dinesh D'Souza is a convicted felon who was granted a pardon by Trump because Trump doesn't believe that campaign finance laws should apply to Republicans. He's a hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Pushing RWNJ propaganda. Of course you are.

NP here, not surprisingly, you are not attacking the facts and logic, but the person presenting the case.

I did. I called it propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

You know why. Just doesn't suit your narrative and self-interests.

Because they need to know their place. TJ is reserved for their betters

Nope. Wrong. The kids will do fine at TJ. They have mostly richer more involved black parents. It is just that it doesn't improve the community overall as politicians are just using a few kids to claim victory when the bigger problem is building the base/pipeline and improving standards - look at the statistics on high school math/language metrics. And white folks just displaced some pesky Asians and are slapping each other on the back.

Focus should be on helping the entire Black community. Not just pushing a few richer, privileged black people and claiming false victory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

You know why. Just doesn't suit your narrative and self-interests.

Because they need to know their place. TJ is reserved for their betters

Nope. Wrong. The kids will do fine at TJ. They have mostly richer more involved black parents. It is just that it doesn't improve the community overall as politicians are just using a few kids to claim victory when the bigger problem is building the base/pipeline and improving standards - look at the statistics on high school math/language metrics. And white folks just displaced some pesky Asians and are slapping each other on the back.

Focus should be on helping the entire Black community. Not just pushing a few richer, privileged black people and claiming false victory.

Amen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

You know why. Just doesn't suit your narrative and self-interests.

Because they need to know their place. TJ is reserved for their betters

Nope. Wrong. The kids will do fine at TJ. They have mostly richer more involved black parents. It is just that it doesn't improve the community overall as politicians are just using a few kids to claim victory when the bigger problem is building the base/pipeline and improving standards - look at the statistics on high school math/language metrics. And white folks just displaced some pesky Asians and are slapping each other on the back.

Focus should be on helping the entire Black community. Not just pushing a few richer, privileged black people and claiming false victory.

Amen.

Seems like the Supreme Court is not that popular anymore among TJ anti-Asian progressives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

You know why. Just doesn't suit your narrative and self-interests.

Because they need to know their place. TJ is reserved for their betters

Nope. Wrong. The kids will do fine at TJ. They have mostly richer more involved black parents. It is just that it doesn't improve the community overall as politicians are just using a few kids to claim victory when the bigger problem is building the base/pipeline and improving standards - look at the statistics on high school math/language metrics. And white folks just displaced some pesky Asians and are slapping each other on the back.

Focus should be on helping the entire Black community. Not just pushing a few richer, privileged black people and claiming false victory.

Amen.

Seems like the Supreme Court is not that popular anymore among TJ anti-Asian progressives.

There are far, FAR more anti-Asian conservatives than anti-Asian progressives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

You know why. Just doesn't suit your narrative and self-interests.

Because they need to know their place. TJ is reserved for their betters

Nope. Wrong. The kids will do fine at TJ. They have mostly richer more involved black parents. It is just that it doesn't improve the community overall as politicians are just using a few kids to claim victory when the bigger problem is building the base/pipeline and improving standards - look at the statistics on high school math/language metrics. And white folks just displaced some pesky Asians and are slapping each other on the back.

Focus should be on helping the entire Black community. Not just pushing a few richer, privileged black people and claiming false victory.

Amen.

Seems like the Supreme Court is not that popular anymore among TJ anti-Asian progressives.

There are far, FAR more anti-Asian conservatives than anti-Asian progressives.

Citation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Happy day!! The Supreme Court just refused to block Thomas Jefferson High School’s (TJ) admissions policy! Wow! Three dissenters are Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas.

Finally!

Uncle Ruckus Thomas always votes against anything that helps Black people. SMH.

Actually TJ's new policy hurts black people in the long run.

Definitely going to have to show your work on that one. Start by talking about how access to college opportunities has harmed Black folks.

You know why. Just doesn't suit your narrative and self-interests.

Because they need to know their place. TJ is reserved for their betters

Nope. Wrong. The kids will do fine at TJ. They have mostly richer more involved black parents. It is just that it doesn't improve the community overall as politicians are just using a few kids to claim victory when the bigger problem is building the base/pipeline and improving standards - look at the statistics on high school math/language metrics. And white folks just displaced some pesky Asians and are slapping each other on the back.

Focus should be on helping the entire Black community. Not just pushing a few richer, privileged black people and claiming false victory.

Amen.

Seems like the Supreme Court is not that popular anymore among TJ anti-Asian progressives.

There are far, FAR more anti-Asian conservatives than anti-Asian progressives.

Not at FCPS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Pushing RWNJ propaganda. Of course you are.

NP here, not surprisingly, you are not attacking the facts and logic, but the person presenting the case.

I did. I called it propaganda.

No, you didn't. You attacked the author. That is classic dissonance. You have no facts to counter the message, so you attack the messenger. He has a footnote and facts for everything in the book. Maybe read up on Thomas Sowell as well. You are such a stereotypical wokie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Pushing RWNJ propaganda. Of course you are.

NP here, not surprisingly, you are not attacking the facts and logic, but the person presenting the case.

I did. I called it propaganda.

No, you didn't. You attacked the author. That is classic dissonance. You have no facts to counter the message, so you attack the messenger. He has a footnote and facts for everything in the book. Maybe read up on Thomas Sowell as well. You are such a stereotypical wokie.

Fact: it's propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Pushing RWNJ propaganda. Of course you are.

NP here, not surprisingly, you are not attacking the facts and logic, but the person presenting the case.

I did. I called it propaganda.

No, you didn't. You attacked the author. That is classic dissonance. You have no facts to counter the message, so you attack the messenger. He has a footnote and facts for everything in the book. Maybe read up on Thomas Sowell as well. You are such a stereotypical wokie.

Fact: it's propaganda.

Has Thomas Sowell been cancelled because he's black? I've never read an author who makes as much sense as him, and of course, that will get you in trouble in some circles if the message isn't the one they want to hear.