Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooo, Meghan’s never going back to the U.K., is she? Left Harry to clean up the mess they left.

She’s such a disappointment.

That’s the impression I get. She could barely stand it what - 3 days?

It rains constantly, the entire island is a class system, Britain clearly has issues since they’re pushing for Brexit, and the national media has been after her for three years.

Meanwhile she goes overseas and everyone loves her, it’s far more diverse and she isn’t isolated in some cottage in the woods next to a family graveyard.

Tell me - would you go back?

You mean the "cottage" she just blew over $3 million in PUBLIC money remodeling?

Maybe it was his choice?

[Anonymous]

It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

A better read that predicted this a year ago.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-royal-rift-j3cft5d3d

Can not access full article

It’s basically this in a nutshell

I don’t believe a word of this.

Well, I googled Keir Simmons' Twitter to see if he had posted anything about this, and the search results showed a bunch of tweets about Harry and Meghan posted since the news broke. You can't see the whole tweet, just a teaser of the beginning of each one. When you click on the specific search result tweet, it takes you to a Twitter page that doesn't exist. Going to Simmon's Twitter home page, all those tweets are gone, and he just has a tweet saying that he's just "going to listen" for a while. Hmmmm. . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread really points out just how out of touch DCUM's resident pearl-clutchers are. I am reading it for entertainment value. The anti-MM people are totally nuts, aren't they? Funny stuff.

I don't like any of them. But the glaring reality is that H&M are wildly popular worldwide, have a kid to support, and can make a lot more money out of the weird and nasty BRF than in it. Their time to make money is now, not in ten years. The palace would never have worked with them so they did it on their own. William has a reputation of being nasty, so they couldn't wait on him. The press coverage worldwide is largely positive of H&M. It's a common sense decision driven by shrewd market awareness, but the frothing posters here have no idea.

Also, the divorce prediction babbling just sounds stupid, though entertaining to read. It's entirely possible they'll end up divorced (like a high number of people in the world), but that does not mean this wasn't a sharp marketing move.

Well, glad you consider yourself SO in touch. Your opinion is just that; your opinion. Everyone here is free to express their opinion as well. Although I skip any post with name calling. No way to have an intelligent conversation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

I had a similar thought. No one can try to delay them with the baby back in Canada.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread really points out just how out of touch DCUM's resident pearl-clutchers are. I am reading it for entertainment value. The anti-MM people are totally nuts, aren't they? Funny stuff.

I don't like any of them. But the glaring reality is that H&M are wildly popular worldwide, have a kid to support, and can make a lot more money out of the weird and nasty BRF than in it. Their time to make money is now, not in ten years. The palace would never have worked with them so they did it on their own. William has a reputation of being nasty, so they couldn't wait on him. The press coverage worldwide is largely positive of H&M. It's a common sense decision driven by shrewd market awareness, but the frothing posters here have no idea.

Also, the divorce prediction babbling just sounds stupid, though entertaining to read. It's entirely possible they'll end up divorced (like a high number of people in the world), but that does not mean this wasn't a sharp marketing move.

That doesn't make sense. Outside the BRF, they're no one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

I think it’s very insulting to the Queen and Prince Charles. No way would they deny them access to leave with their son. The Queen must be heartbroken.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread really points out just how out of touch DCUM's resident pearl-clutchers are. I am reading it for entertainment value. The anti-MM people are totally nuts, aren't they? Funny stuff.

I don't like any of them. But the glaring reality is that H&M are wildly popular worldwide, have a kid to support, and can make a lot more money out of the weird and nasty BRF than in it. Their time to make money is now, not in ten years. The palace would never have worked with them so they did it on their own. William has a reputation of being nasty, so they couldn't wait on him. The press coverage worldwide is largely positive of H&M. It's a common sense decision driven by shrewd market awareness, but the frothing posters here have no idea.

Also, the divorce prediction babbling just sounds stupid, though entertaining to read. It's entirely possible they'll end up divorced (like a high number of people in the world), but that does not mean this wasn't a sharp marketing move.

That doesn't make sense. Outside the BRF, they're no one.

Are you an American? That’s really not how we see it. Harry will be a prince forever and that’s all that matters to us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread really points out just how out of touch DCUM's resident pearl-clutchers are. I am reading it for entertainment value. The anti-MM people are totally nuts, aren't they? Funny stuff.

I don't like any of them. But the glaring reality is that H&M are wildly popular worldwide, have a kid to support, and can make a lot more money out of the weird and nasty BRF than in it. Their time to make money is now, not in ten years. The palace would never have worked with them so they did it on their own. William has a reputation of being nasty, so they couldn't wait on him. The press coverage worldwide is largely positive of H&M. It's a common sense decision driven by shrewd market awareness, but the frothing posters here have no idea.

Also, the divorce prediction babbling just sounds stupid, though entertaining to read. It's entirely possible they'll end up divorced (like a high number of people in the world), but that does not mean this wasn't a sharp marketing move.

That doesn't make sense. Outside the BRF, they're no one.

They don't need the BRF. The BRF needs them. They can eliminate titles completely and still make a fortune as just Harry and Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Nah. Megan is just a third-rate over the hill actress if she’s no longer a princess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

I think it’s very insulting to the Queen and Prince Charles. No way would they deny them access to leave with their son. The Queen must be heartbroken.

Yeah, talk to me when they stop allowing pedophiles to give creepy interviews in the Palace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

I think it’s very insulting to the Queen and Prince Charles. No way would they deny them access to leave with their son. The Queen must be heartbroken.

I doubt it. I mean, we’re not talking about one of her dogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

I think it’s very insulting to the Queen and Prince Charles. No way would they deny them access to leave with their son. The Queen must be heartbroken.

I doubt it. I mean, we’re not talking about one of her dogs.

Too funny ... trying to imagine the Queen emoting over any of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was really smart to leave Archie in Canada. QEII can't prevent him from leaving that way. She holds custody.

This is the family that's protecting a pedophile and didn't.care that her own husband's mother was killed. Really smart to keep the baby far away.

I think it’s very insulting to the Queen and Prince Charles. No way would they deny them access to leave with their son. The Queen must be heartbroken.

I doubt it. I mean, we’re not talking about one of her dogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread really points out just how out of touch DCUM's resident pearl-clutchers are. I am reading it for entertainment value. The anti-MM people are totally nuts, aren't they? Funny stuff.

I don't like any of them. But the glaring reality is that H&M are wildly popular worldwide, have a kid to support, and can make a lot more money out of the weird and nasty BRF than in it. Their time to make money is now, not in ten years. The palace would never have worked with them so they did it on their own. William has a reputation of being nasty, so they couldn't wait on him. The press coverage worldwide is largely positive of H&M. It's a common sense decision driven by shrewd market awareness, but the frothing posters here have no idea.

Also, the divorce prediction babbling just sounds stupid, though entertaining to read. It's entirely possible they'll end up divorced (like a high number of people in the world), but that does not mean this wasn't a sharp marketing move.

This is my take as well.
It does seem that perhaps “the court” has an agenda here. I get the feeling maybe the brother’s would have been fine, but the staff has been working to exacerbate the tension.
I would like to know to what end. Who benefits when Harry leaves?
Charles has been whittling down the family and cutting people off.
Isn’t it possible that this is the work of lesser royals, trying to get back on the gravy train?