Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Re: the merchandising, Jay Z and Beyoncé pulled a similar trademark law stunt with Blue Ivy. They never actually intended to merchandise her name but they wanted to stop someone else from doing it, so they registered hypothetical products like strollers. You’re not really supposed to just squat on trademarks like that but I’m guessing the Sussexes are trying to protect their name more than actually sell tee shirts.

Meghan's been talking to Givenchy, among others. She's serious about selling the brand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have not read all 80 pages but I don’t understand the issue. If she sucks so bad and makes Royal staff cry, makes people quit, is rude, doesn’t get along with Kate, and spends oodles of money that “doesn’t belong to her”, then why isn’t this good riddance to bad rubbish? Shouldn’t the crown be happy she wants to not be a senior royal and wants to stop the money train and live far away from the people she is “making cry”? If all those stories are true, why wouldn’t the official statement be “we will miss them and wish them the best”?

You don’t fight to keep someone near who you hate.

Who’s stopping the “money train”? They are still going to draw 95% of their income from the royal family, plus they’re still going to have enormous security bills without doing their duties. Talk about having their cake and eating it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

A better read that predicted this a year ago.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-royal-rift-j3cft5d3d

Can not access full article

It’s basically this in a nutshell

What does that mean that the rift doesn't involved Harry and Meghan? I'm confused.

Also, I think we can all agree that Kier Simmons is quite a handsome devil!

Honestly I’m not sure. I can’t imagine who the rift is between unless Charles and William? But they seem chummy lately. So no idea.

Sounds completely fabricated and nonsensical.

Oh no - the jealousy thing is real. William is known for his temper and his pride.



And he’s not shy about using the press to undercut family.


Everything else is up in the air - although the rumors I heard are juicy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have not read all 80 pages but I don’t understand the issue. If she sucks so bad and makes Royal staff cry, makes people quit, is rude, doesn’t get along with Kate, and spends oodles of money that “doesn’t belong to her”, then why isn’t this good riddance to bad rubbish? Shouldn’t the crown be happy she wants to not be a senior royal and wants to stop the money train and live far away from the people she is “making cry”? If all those stories are true, why wouldn’t the official statement be “we will miss them and wish them the best”?

You don’t fight to keep someone near who you hate.

Who knows if they are true? The news is desperate for stories so they post any accusation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Wow!! MM left the baby in Canada with a nanny!!!!???!!!

Where are you hearing this?

Fox reported. So sad for them all!

Nanny and best friend. And in case you hadn’t heard - she got on a plane four hours ago to get back to him.

No, silly, the nanny is not her best friend.

DP. With a nanny and a friend. Two people taking care of him.

[Anonymous]

I predict Megan will make as much money as she can quickly and then trade up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Stuff it, sister. Your fave has been exposed as the money grabbing gold digger many suspected from go. I feel sorry for the gullible sobs who believed in the humanitarian, Mother Theresa, greatest love story ever told, this must all be so terribly shocking. The jig is up.

+1. Spot on. She craves being a Hollywood Hills center of attention she never was as a D list nobody yacht girl. She also probably thought marrying a royal was going to give her access to a $100M bank account. She wants to get her hands on loot and she was to party with A listers. She's a vapid and desperate social climber. This all has nothing to do with the royal drama or the mean press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I predict Megan will make as much money as she can quickly and then trade up.

Agree. She’s an evil user. Probably abuser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She cares nothing about Harry. He was nothing but her stepping stone.

Umm, duh. But maybe he's secretly closeted, so he's also using her. Or maybe the entire thing is just fake royal theatre to keep the dumb masses entertained. Who knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is almost 40 lol

Harry just turned 36 in September, so not sure that is considered almost 40. Meghan is older, so closer to 40 than Harry is.

...you really want to push a narrative that a man she met at 33 is ‘vulnerable’. He’s a two-time combat and Afghanistan vet. Healthy, virile and well engaged in multiple endeavors.

I’m sorry you’re jealous he loves his wife like none of the other Windsor men do (except Charles) but deal with it.

Stuff it, sister. Your fave has been exposed as the money grabbing gold digger many suspected from go. I feel sorry for the gullible sobs who believed in the humanitarian, Mother Theresa, greatest love story ever told, this must all be so terribly shocking. The jig is up.

+1. Spot on. She craves being a Hollywood Hills center of attention she never was as a D list nobody yacht girl. She also probably thought marrying a royal was going to give her access to a $100M bank account. She wants to get her hands on loot and she was to party with A listers. She's a vapid and desperate social climber. This all has nothing to do with the royal drama or the mean press.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooo, Meghan’s never going back to the U.K., is she? Left Harry to clean up the mess they left.

She’s such a disappointment.

That’s the impression I get. She could barely stand it what - 3 days?

It rains constantly, the entire island is a class system, Britain clearly has issues since they’re pushing for Brexit, and the national media has been after her for three years.

Meanwhile she goes overseas and everyone loves her, it’s far more diverse and she isn’t isolated in some cottage in the woods next to a family graveyard.

Tell me - would you go back?

You mean the "cottage" she just blew over $3 million in PUBLIC money remodeling?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooo, Meghan’s never going back to the U.K., is she? Left Harry to clean up the mess they left.

She’s such a disappointment.

That’s the impression I get. She could barely stand it what - 3 days?

It rains constantly, the entire island is a class system, Britain clearly has issues since they’re pushing for Brexit, and the national media has been after her for three years.

Meanwhile she goes overseas and everyone loves her, it’s far more diverse and she isn’t isolated in some cottage in the woods next to a family graveyard.

Tell me - would you go back?

You mean the "cottage" she just blew over $3 million in PUBLIC money remodeling?

That was her sticking it to them. B****. What’s wrong with her??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According The New York Times, it sounds like they intend to live the high life off daddy's money and a new non-profit foundation racket (a new family foundation they recently created) and Meghan thinks she can become another Gwyneth Paltrow with a goop lifestyle brand. Hilarious.

All of this sounds plausible to me. You’re gonna be sooo mad when it works out.

Scamming a non-profit racket sounds plausible. I can also see her pushing her "goop" lifestyle brand on shows like Wendy Williams. So classy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How the rift between William and Harry deepened....

Explains all the weirdness around Archie’s birth. It was such a bizarre media mess.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7870389/William-told-Harry-heed-mothers-warning-RICHARD-KAY-GEOFFREY-LEVY-reveal-bond-soured.html

A better read that predicted this a year ago.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-royal-rift-j3cft5d3d

Can not access full article

It’s basically this in a nutshell

I don’t believe a word of this.

[Anonymous]

This thread really points out just how out of touch DCUM's resident pearl-clutchers are. I am reading it for entertainment value. The anti-MM people are totally nuts, aren't they? Funny stuff.

I don't like any of them. But the glaring reality is that H&M are wildly popular worldwide, have a kid to support, and can make a lot more money out of the weird and nasty BRF than in it. Their time to make money is now, not in ten years. The palace would never have worked with them so they did it on their own. William has a reputation of being nasty, so they couldn't wait on him. The press coverage worldwide is largely positive of H&M. It's a common sense decision driven by shrewd market awareness, but the frothing posters here have no idea.

Also, the divorce prediction babbling just sounds stupid, though entertaining to read. It's entirely possible they'll end up divorced (like a high number of people in the world), but that does not mean this wasn't a sharp marketing move.