| People on dcum Fairfax schools forum think about Langley too much. |
Langley residents are probably the most active in the county when it comes to criticizing FCPS, starting groups like "Voices of Fairfax," and launching recall petitions of School Board members. Even someone like Asra Nomani who has devoted most of her life for the past two years to taking down FCPS for changing TJ admissions lives in the Langley district. They cast a big shadow. The challenge they face is that many want to replace Tholen and other School Board members, but solely on their own terms. And their terms generally aren't going to win elections. Even when they could align with other parents on issues of mutual concern, many end up bickering and sowing division because they are worried about not having total control (especially on anything that might touch, even remotely, on Langley's boundaries). |
The boundary is not done. The current 8th graders at LMS are about to go through their second split feeder in 2 years. So its not done for those kids. |
I think most on this post have disdain for FCPS and the school board. |
Oooh I struck a cord with you! As a Colvin Run parent, i agree with you on the fact that ending split feeders is good. Of course Flip-Flip-Elaine sacrificed about 40 current 8th graders to do so by sending them through a second split feeder in two years. And it is not an island, it is a neighborhood that was part of the MHS Community. Hopefully someday FCPS will find a way to make your kids or grandkids feel like those in Shouse did during this process - then you'll understand some of these posts. Many in Shouse supported Elaine during the election - I cant speak for everyone, but Im pretty sure she lost 99.9% of us in 2023. Now please keep spinning your 'Langley parents were so generous and kind and righteous during the boundary process' fantasy. I love good fiction. |
Um, you realize that there are many posters who disagree with you - right? Are you so deluded to think you've been talking to the same person? |
Seriously. I'm amazed that the PP actually thinks there's only one person who feels that way. Kind of clueless, to say the least. |
And oh, how different things would be now had people like you actually taken the time to listen to what Voices of Fairfax, etc. had to say about the 2019 elections. But no - you probably called that group all kinds of names to make you feel superior. And now you're complaining about the absurd SB YOU elected. Oh well. Elections have consequences. |
Well, speaking of fiction... you do realize that before Shouse was a part of the MHS community, it was zoned for Langley - right? I lived in Shouse during the 80s and our family dealt with having to switch from Langley to McLean. Not many people were happy about that. I didn't vote for Tholen in the last election and don't plan to vote for her in 2023 (if she runs) - but this constant whining about Langley parents just makes it clear you're not arguing in good faith. The SB sets the boundaries - not any one school. As much as you enjoy pretending otherwise. |
|
DP, but it's indisputable that some Langley parents weighed in very heavily during the boundary process to influence the outcome and that Elaine Tholen, herself a Great Falls resident, prioritized their interests over those of McLean families. There's a reason why, after all the back and forth, McLean is still looking at overcrowding for years to come under FCPS's latest projections (which don't even factor in quite a few of the developments approved for Tysons).
That's not to say that most Langley parents weren't sympathetic to the overcrowding situation there, or wouldn't support an addition to McLean. In fact, building an addition at McLean would give Langley families additional comfort that there won't be another round of boundaries changes in the next 5-10 years that raise similar issues about the spill-over effects. |
|
So much was done wrong during the boundary process. Capacity at McLean is getting worse. Development from Tysons will continue to overwhelm adjacent high schools. We (and our kids) have all seen different sides of these problems, and hopefully the board will not continue to fail to develop, fund, and implement long term solutions.
The one thing I think we all agree on (or most of us) is that the one common factor in all of these failures, at least for the Tysons, McLean, Great Falls area, is Elaine Tholen. She has failed our kids and failed us as parents. |
| ALL of the SB members need to go. |
| Our school board needs to stop being used as a springboard for progressive democrat politicians. |
What was incredibly wrong about this boundary process is when it occurred. FCPS school board has been negligent in their duties as per the Code of Virginia. I'm surprised Tholen got anything done since the school board as an entity has not done boundary changes. Shouse was an easy move to Langley because of the CRES attendance area. Awaken that contentious but dormant beast? The West Briar Island is baffling. As is the no movement into CRES of Toll Brothers. I don't get why no movement as part of this since FCPS had nothing else going on in the attendance area department. Over a period of years FCPS has had 2 boundary processes and zero administrative boundary changes: https://www.fcps.edu/about-fcps/facilities-planning-future/school-boundary-adjustments Shouse etc are the pink on the high school map https://www.fcps.edu/sites/default/files/media/pdf/SY%202021-22%20High%20School%20Boundaries.pdf First out of Mclean and I expect more to follow in various directions. |
|
When Shouse was last at Langley in the mid-80s, all of Great Falls west of Springvale was at Herndon.
They expanded Langley's boundaries and then, even though its enrollment had dropped, they expanded the school and then expanded the boundaries yet again to justify the expansion of the school. And somehow never managed to assign a single apartment or condo in Herndon, Reston, or Tysons to the 2% FARMS school. Thanks, Elaine. We can tell just how important "equity" really is to you and your Democrat cronies. Get ready to defend your blatant hypocrisy next year. |