Queen Elizabeth II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else watching any of the events? I was getting a kick out of the horses during today’s procession. [/quote]is it still going on?[/quote]

Watch out your ignorance is showing. You honestly think they are going to have this over very quickly for someone who was serving 70 years of their life?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Kate, Camilla and Meghan had wealthy aristocratic background, they would've been treated differently by the firm and the media.

I thought Camilla was an aristocrat

She was. To the point that her family advised her not get involved with he crown prince because they knew what that would involve.

I thought I heard that Camilla’s grandma was the other woman to Phillip for awhile and that’s how/why Camilla got with Charles?

No. Camilla’s great-great grandmother was King Edward VII’s mistress. Camilla is an aristocrat. Her family was in the same hunting circles as the BRF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

They have freedom of expression. Issuing a statement does nothing but draw further attention. If you are issuing a statement you better be ready to sue and feel you have a good chance of winning. Meghan knows this, because she has not sued for some of the most damaging stories, like the bullying.

Have they sued Tom Bowers?

He is one of UK's most distinguished journalists and biography writers, his book is bulletproof. Nor did they sue The Telegraph's Valentine Low for breaking the well sourced bully story.

H&M got excellent advice and protection from the Palace Machine until the duo went on a collision course with the Queen and the heirs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

They have freedom of expression. Issuing a statement does nothing but draw further attention. If you are issuing a statement you better be ready to sue and feel you have a good chance of winning. Meghan knows this, because she has not sued for some of the most damaging stories, like the bullying.

Have they sued Tom Bowers?

He is one of UK's most distinguished journalists and biography writers, his book is bulletproof. Nor did they sue The Telegraph's Valentine Low for breaking the well sourced bully story.

H&M got excellent advice and protection from the Palace Machine until the duo went on a collision course with the Queen and the heirs.

OMG Tom Bowers is NOT one of the UK's most distinguished journalists. You are most clearly not from the UK, because he's infamous for these kinds of hatchet jobs and basically writing tabloids in book form. This is like claiming that Piers Morgan is one of the UK's most esteemed journalists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

[Anonymous]

The gloves are off. The only thing protecting that family was love of an old Queen. The rest of them are posh shoe leather in the worst cost of living crisis since WWII.

I mean - people said it was respect for the Queen that they held back but I've never seen a crowd boo a procession like this. Inside the U.K.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

They have freedom of expression. Issuing a statement does nothing but draw further attention. If you are issuing a statement you better be ready to sue and feel you have a good chance of winning. Meghan knows this, because she has not sued for some of the most damaging stories, like the bullying.

Have they sued Tom Bowers?

He is one of UK's most distinguished journalists and biography writers, his book is bulletproof. Nor did they sue The Telegraph's Valentine Low for breaking the well sourced bully story.

H&M got excellent advice and protection from the Palace Machine until the duo went on a collision course with the Queen and the heirs.

OMG Tom Bowers is NOT one of the UK's most distinguished journalists. You are most clearly not from the UK, because he's infamous for these kinds of hatchet jobs and basically writing tabloids in book form. This is like claiming that Piers Morgan is one of the UK's most esteemed journalists.

OMG Tom Bowers was a distinguished BBC journalist and producer of BBC's Panorama for two decades. He has written biographies of moguls, all have sued and all have lost. He is an impeccable investigative journalist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

Was she the first person to marry into the modern day BRF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

Was she the first person to marry into the modern day BRF?

The first non-white American? Absolutely. They went crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

Was she the first person to marry into the modern day BRF?

The first non-white American? Absolutely. They went crazy.

Whi8ch they are you talking about? Prince/King Charles walked her down the aisle! The Queen invited her to celebrate Christmas even before she did Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

No, I couldn't imagine this life. Everyone is going on about Charles' fountain pen tantrum. I admit I had a bit of a tantrum myself the same day, but I'm a nobody and nobody took any notice. The royals may have wealth, but they will never experience the freedom and anonymity I have. Same goes with US presidents, which is probably why political spouses are hesitant for their spouses to enter presidential races.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

[Anonymous]

Harry will wear his uniform for Vigil of the Princes. They need to rename it to include females.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The gloves are off. The only thing protecting that family was love of an old Queen. The rest of them are posh shoe leather in the worst cost of living crisis since WWII.

I mean - people said it was respect for the Queen that they held back but I've never seen a crowd boo a procession like this. Inside the U.K.

Let’s get back on track. This thread is about the Queen. I’m surprised that anti monarchy protests didn’t wait until after the mourning period. Elizabeth may be viewed as the last monarch if Charles can’t hang on to the crown for even one year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

Meghan is a deranged, mentally ill golddigger who will fade into
obscurity after the divorce.

How sad being you. Full of hate and you have no clue why. Probably bcs you hate yourself.

Do you can hate someone and not hate yourself.