Queen Elizabeth II

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is anyone else watching any of the events? I was getting a kick out of the horses during today’s procession.

is it still going on?

The YouTube from the Royal channel has it all

[Anonymous]

C'mon. Folks have to admit that some of the stuff they see online about Markle is absolutely unhinged. As though she is some sort of evil presence.

I don't really follow the royals but when I see this stuff pop up in my feed I feel bad for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

Um no. William and his wife look miserable within 2 feet of each other. Meanwhile Meghan and Harry are successful with love in every action.

Just like the neighborhood couple you hear are divorcing and your first reaction is “I am shocked. They are always so lovey-dovey.”

I'll bet those same people fell for Tom Cruise's couch acrobatics professing his love for Katie Holmes. Yeah, that wasn't real and didn't last. But gullible people want to believe in fairy tales.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

This. William and Kate lived in rural Wales for 3 years when they were first married and George was a baby and toddler. H&M could have easily done something similar. Harry could have even gone back to some sort of military service or air ambulance like William.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

Senior working royals who do military service donate their salaries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

Senior working royals who do military service donate their salaries.

Quit making things up. A) Prince Phillip was married to the Crown Princess and never donated his salary. and B) Harry did 10 years in the military, so by your logic I would think a decade + of no salary for his country would be enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

You are betraying your own ignorance. Beatrice and Edo are NOT working royals. They are not HRH, do not have security or salaries, and Edo and the baby do not have titles. I believe they do have a royal apartment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

You are betraying your own ignorance. Beatrice and Edo are NOT working royals. They are not HRH, do not have security or salaries, and Edo and the baby do not have titles. I believe they do have a royal apartment.

Royal apartment? They live in St. James Palace. And Beatrice is a Counselor of State AND an HRH. Not exactly sure how you can be a non-working royal and run the country in absence of the King but let's split hairs here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

Senior working royals who do military service donate their salaries.

Quit making things up. A) Prince Phillip was married to the Crown Princess and never donated his salary. and B) Harry did 10 years in the military, so by your logic I would think a decade + of no salary for his country would be enough.

Can’t take anything you say seriously if you think Phillip married a crown princess. Your royal know it all card has been officially revoked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

Senior working royals who do military service donate their salaries.

Quit making things up. A) Prince Phillip was married to the Crown Princess and never donated his salary. and B) Harry did 10 years in the military, so by your logic I would think a decade + of no salary for his country would be enough.

Can’t take anything you say seriously if you think Phillip married a crown princess. Your royal know it all card has been officially revoked.

What would you like to call the future Queen Regnant of the United Kingdom? Irrelevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.

She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times).

Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,

They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry.

And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy. But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.

But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."

They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones.

The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"

The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.

...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.

And she didn’t know this before marrying into the BRF?

I don't think one can ever quite prepare for the vitriolic and concerted onslaught of press invasion that comes with marrying into the Royal Family. Can you genuinely magine hundreds of headlines being written about you every single day?

I think Cressdia Bonas and Chelsy Davy worked this out.

https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a26379059/cressida-bonas-broke-up-with-prince-harry-will-kate-tour/

Yes and this is generally why long periods of dating are recommended so the girlfriends get a clear and accurate picture. This is why William wanted Harry to slow his roll with Meghan. This passed Harry off, but he just wanted Meghan to have a better idea what she was signing up for. And turns out William was right, because Meghan, by her own admission, had NO IDEA what she was signing up for.

I'm not defending Meghan, but it seems as though she was going to have to decide between a kids and a full understanding of what marriage to a member of the BRF entails. She was 37 when she got married; if she wanted at least two kids, tick tock (I say this as someone who had her last kid at 41).

Now if she could just get to the age where you don't give a f*ck what people say about you because you're busy living your life, we'd have a happy ending.

But she could have very easily done that if they got married quickly, had kids and then took 2-3 years to SLOWLY ease into royal life, like Kate and William did. Not seek the limelight with multiple engagements and big talk about modernizing and changing and whatnot.

This didn't happen bc Meghan didn't marry Harry to slowly ease into anything, she married him for the prime time.

You don't slowly ease into things when you're 36 and want kids.

You can slowly ease into a working royal life at any age. Especially if you tell the Firm's boss that you want to take things slow after marriage to fully learn and understand your new situation. Marry, have a kid, fly under the radar for a few years, do a couple of things here and there until people get used to you. Then work up to prime time.

They literally asked for that? BRF said no to being part-time like K/W were for the first six years of marriage. Rented a barnhouse in the Cotswolds? The rota hired a helicopter to photograph the interior of their bedroom.

No, they asked for part time to do other stuff in the meantime.

Other stuff like piloting a helicopter and joining the royal navy? Jesus. The other royals did 'other stuff'. Even Beatrice and Edo have jobs.

You are betraying your own ignorance. Beatrice and Edo are NOT working royals. They are not HRH, do not have security or salaries, and Edo and the baby do not have titles. I believe they do have a royal apartment.

Royal apartment? They live in St. James Palace. And Beatrice is a Counselor of State AND an HRH. Not exactly sure how you can be a non-working royal and run the country in absence of the King but let's split hairs here.

You really don’t see the difference between she’s doing and producing a podcast based upon your experience in the royal family? You really think Meghan would have been a happy SAHM in Wales whole Harry flew helicopters? They weren’t asking for a viable alternate arrangement. They wanted to sell themselves to Netflix and Spotify.