Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Queen Elizabeth II"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]People didn't like Kate and although she was just a young girl , she was brutally criticized because she was a commoner and not good enough for future king. However, she won everyone, including family and media. It must be tough for her but she handles it like a pro. She's been with him since their teen years, their connection is strong. She is a real asset for him.[/quote] She didn’t do anything to win anyone over. She just got relentlessly sugary press coverage. Not sure why that’s the case (other than the whole bot gate thing covered in The NY Times). [/quote] Have you forgotten the Wisteria sisters and Waity Katie years? Ot wasn’t always positive but she put in her time to get where she is now,[/quote] They tore her to shreds in Tattler just two years ago. That article was as below the belt as it gets. Someone should have told Meghan it’s not personal, they are power games, they were testing for weak spots and found plenty with Meghan and Harry. [/quote] [b]And the topless sunbathing pics. Quite the invasion of privacy.[/b] But I think calling Fergie the "Duchess of Pork" was one of the meanest headlines. Her weight has been an issue for her so I can't imagine what she would have thought of that.[/quote] But the family responded to the topless pics and, IIRC, sued the tabloid that published them. [b]They also responded when there were recent articles claiming Kate was anorexic. [/b]So it seems that they are willing to speak out against the media to protect their own. If the articles about Kate being anorexic warranted a response, one would think that racist articles would likewise warrant a response, especially for a family who is "very much not racist."[/quote] They also sued for saying Kate got Botox. They're pretty sue happy protecting the chosen ones. The anorexic thing was also scrubbed entirely; that unhinged Princess Michael of Kent (yes, the one who wore a racist pin to meet Meghan) called Kate something like, "an anorexic dullard, just like his mother (Diana)"[/quote] The plastic surgeon was using Kate's image to promote his business, which he didn't have permission to do.[/quote] ...Okay, and? What about all the people who *literally* make livelihoods out of bashing Meghan Markle? There is a veritable cottage industry of YouTubers, social media personalities whose entire careers consist of smearing Meghan every single day, without exaggeration.[/quote] They have freedom of expression. Issuing a statement does nothing but draw further attention. If you are issuing a statement you better be ready to sue and feel you have a good chance of winning. Meghan knows this, because she has not sued for some of the most damaging stories, like the bullying. [/quote] Have they sued Tom Bowers?[/quote] He is one of UK's most distinguished journalists and biography writers, his book is bulletproof. Nor did they sue The Telegraph's Valentine Low for breaking the well sourced bully story. H&M got excellent advice and protection from the Palace Machine until the duo went on a collision course with the Queen and the heirs. [/quote] OMG Tom Bowers is NOT one of the UK's most distinguished journalists. You are most clearly not from the UK, because he's infamous for these kinds of hatchet jobs and basically writing tabloids in book form. This is like claiming that Piers Morgan is one of the UK's most esteemed journalists.[/quote] OMG Tom Bowers was a distinguished BBC journalist and producer of BBC's Panorama for two decades. He has written biographies of moguls, all have sued and all have lost. He is an impeccable investigative journalist.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics