How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

And the GOP, by doing this, will exactly provide the moral and legal justification for reforming the court system adding more justices, because the American public will support it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be REBALANCED.

Fixed it. Words matter. We need to call it what it is. Mitch has packed the courts, Dems are looking to rebalance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be REBALANCED.

Fixed it. Words matter. We need to call it what it is. Mitch has packed the courts, Dems are looking to rebalance.

You need to learn the definition of "packing the courts."
Mitch has filled vacant seats. That is not packing.

What the dems want to do..... IS packing. Expanding the number of justices is the very definition of packing the courts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be REBALANCED.

Fixed it. Words matter. We need to call it what it is. Mitch has packed the courts, Dems are looking to rebalance.

You need to learn the definition of "packing the courts."
Mitch has filled vacant seats. That is not packing.

What the dems want to do..... IS packing. Expanding the number of justices is the very definition of packing the courts.

I'm not going to play your game, I was responding to the PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be REBALANCED.

Fixed it. Words matter. We need to call it what it is. Mitch has packed the courts, Dems are looking to rebalance.

You need to learn the definition of "packing the courts."
Mitch has filled vacant seats. That is not packing.

What the dems want to do..... IS packing. Expanding the number of justices is the very definition of packing the courts.

DP. Are you posting in good faith?

[Anonymous]

Thank goodness the room is closed so we won't have the wackos disrupting this hearing like we had with Kavanaugh.

This is one of the few perks of Covid.

[Anonymous]

Mike Lee is there in person. When asked if he had tested negative he didn't respond.

[Anonymous]

Someone should ask her what she feels like when she realizes she is nothing more than a political tool of the Orange Cultmaster and his Trumphumping Minions.

[Anonymous]

I hope Mike Lee infects Grassley and the other R's. I sincerely mean that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Mike Lee infects Grassley and the other R's. I sincerely mean that.

Don’t feel bad. According to them, it’s just a hoax, liberals living their lives in fear, no big deal... so who cares if they get it, right?

[Anonymous]

Now she is wearing a mask. This "hearing" is a hypocritical sham

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now she is wearing a mask. This "hearing" is a hypocritical sham

Naw. Just done spreading. Typhoid Amy.

Senators are far too respectful of these persons presenting before them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope Mike Lee infects Grassley and the other R's. I sincerely mean that.

Lindsey probably has it, too.

[Anonymous]

How is it OK for Lee to be there in person? When some Senators are remote like Leahy? I am flabbergasted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she is wearing a mask. This "hearing" is a hypocritical sham

Naw. Just done spreading. Typhoid Amy.

Senators are far too respectful of these persons presenting before them.

I have less than zero respect for Amy Covid Barrett. She is a shameless partisan hack, a Federalist Society handpicked handmaiden that will set back civil rights and civil liberties decades