How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be unpacked.

[Anonymous]

And this is cheap compared to Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be unpacked.

So that Biden and Whitmer can re pack it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:RGB is not on heaven she is not that religion

Perhaps it’s Jackie Kennedy Onassis, angry about her Rose Garden.

More likely, Betty Ford. Other than having her name on the garden President Kennedy’s cuckolded wife didn’t care two beans about roses. It was Betty Ford and the Garden Club of Virginia who preserved the gardens. As those ladies said about Jackie: bless her heart.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Calm down with COVID diagnosis of every person you don’t like. Democrats are Such children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Barrets lack of candor is disqualifying and can be taken up by a future impeachment proceeding. So can Kavanaugh's perjury.

The court can be unpacked.

So that Biden and Whitmer can re pack it?

What alternate universe do you come to us from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Calm down with COVID diagnosis of every person you don’t like. Democrats are Such children.

+100
They really are so immature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Calm down with COVID diagnosis of every person you don’t like. Democrats are Such children.

+100
They really are so immature.

Totes, the dear leader of your death cult is hella-mature, fascista.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Please explain this. So, if no Democrats show up tomorrow, they can't hold the hearing, correct?
Or, are they doing virtual hearings?
And it's just the actual vote, which must be in person, that the Democrats have to boycott to prevent it from happening?
Is that possible? Is there any way for the Democrats to stop the vote from taking place?

I thought McConnell had the votes in place. Isn't tomorrow's hearing just window dressing? Can't he call for a vote immediately?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Calm down with COVID diagnosis of every person you don’t like. Democrats are Such children.

+100
They really are so immature.

Like the toddler in chief?

[Anonymous]

I'm not understanding why they can have this hearing when the election is under way. Something like six million people have already voted.

Why doesn't the Senate pass one of the Covid relief bills on Mitch's desk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not understanding why they can have this hearing when the election is under way. Something like six million people have already voted.

Why doesn't the Senate pass one of the Covid relief bills on Mitch's desk?

Yes, DURING an election? WTH?

God forbid McConnell actually does something to help the country instead of himself.

Vile scum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not understanding why they can have this hearing when the election is under way. Something like six million people have already voted.

Why doesn't the Senate pass one of the Covid relief bills on Mitch's desk?

Because McConnell controls the Senate and has decided that it is fine, despite what he did with Garland's seat, to do this opposite for this seat. There is nothing constitutional or illegal about it. Moral? no, illegal, no.

And McConnell and the GOP are showing their priorities, ramming through this nomination instead of helping the American people.