Who will be Governor of Maryland after Hogan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dem field seems to be clearing for Franchot. He will have by far the most money, and has a lane as the establishment candidate. The others Perez (?), Moore(?) etc will try to run to the far left, but I just dont see it.

The idea that a Democratic-establishment guy like Tom Perez will run to the "far left"...

PP, you might want to recalibrate your scale.

Nah PP is right here. Perez has openly flirted with socialism is on the left fringe of the party.

I guess this puts Perez in a pickle, because apparently people like you think he’s a socialist while party activists think he’s a hack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dem field seems to be clearing for Franchot. He will have by far the most money, and has a lane as the establishment candidate. The others Perez (?), Moore(?) etc will try to run to the far left, but I just dont see it.

The idea that a Democratic-establishment guy like Tom Perez will run to the "far left"...

PP, you might want to recalibrate your scale.

Nah PP is right here. Perez has openly flirted with socialism is on the left fringe of the party.

Sounds like fun! Open flirting, at parties!

But really, I have no idea what you're talking about.

[Anonymous]

Rushern Baker for sure

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rushern Baker for sure

LOL, no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Mike Rosenbaum just declared this morning and he’s fantastic.

I got called for a poll he paid for. It was a terrible poll. Before the poll, I'd never heard of him. After the poll, I decided: Nope, no way.

I’m curious what he thinks the point of his campaign is. My guess is that he’s trying to up his profile to run for Senate to replace Cardin when he retires or maybe a house seat after more expected gerrymandering to get rid of Harris who everyone hates.

He’s in Baltimore. No amount of gerrymandering is putting him in Andy Harris’s district.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rushern Baker for sure

He'll never raise the money needed. He didnt last time, when he actually had some juice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Mike Rosenbaum just declared this morning and he’s fantastic.

I got called for a poll he paid for. It was a terrible poll. Before the poll, I'd never heard of him. After the poll, I decided: Nope, no way.

I’m curious what he thinks the point of his campaign is. My guess is that he’s trying to up his profile to run for Senate to replace Cardin when he retires or maybe a house seat after more expected gerrymandering to get rid of Harris who everyone hates.

He’s in Baltimore. No amount of gerrymandering is putting him in Andy Harris’s district.

I don't think there is a requirement to live in your district?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dem field seems to be clearing for Franchot. He will have by far the most money, and has a lane as the establishment candidate. The others Perez (?), Moore(?) etc will try to run to the far left, but I just dont see it.

The idea that a Democratic-establishment guy like Tom Perez will run to the "far left"...

PP, you might want to recalibrate your scale.

Nah PP is right here. Perez has openly flirted with socialism is on the left fringe of the party.

I guess this puts Perez in a pickle, because apparently people like you think he’s a socialist while party activists think he’s a hack.

The pickle announced last week:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dem field seems to be clearing for Franchot. He will have by far the most money, and has a lane as the establishment candidate. The others Perez (?), Moore(?) etc will try to run to the far left, but I just dont see it.

The idea that a Democratic-establishment guy like Tom Perez will run to the "far left"...

PP, you might want to recalibrate your scale.

Nah PP is right here. Perez has openly flirted with socialism is on the left fringe of the party.

I guess this puts Perez in a pickle, because apparently people like you think he’s a socialist while party activists think he’s a hack.

The pickle announced last week:

Perez’s whole strategy is to what exactly? Carry MoCo establishment liberals, hope for a WaPo endorsement and prey that’s enough?

He’s only every won 1 election in his career and it was for a District 5 council seat in 2002 where he got under 10k votes. He then only served one term in elected office. Takes a lot of chutzpah to think he can be governor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm excited John King (former Obama ED Secretary) threw his hat in the ring...

Are you Mrs. King?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm excited John King (former Obama ED Secretary) threw his hat in the ring...

Are you Mrs. King?

LOL.

[Anonymous]

Tom Perez seems to have rallied all of the national party insiders to his side and he may be able to do some decent fund raising. But he has no justifiable reason to run.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm excited John King (former Obama ED Secretary) threw his hat in the ring...

Are you Mrs. King?

LOL.

John King raised a tons of money already. He was a teacher and then a pincipal of a charter school. He cares education which is so inportant for the future. I would like to hear more from him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dem field seems to be clearing for Franchot. He will have by far the most money, and has a lane as the establishment candidate. The others Perez (?), Moore(?) etc will try to run to the far left, but I just dont see it.

The idea that a Democratic-establishment guy like Tom Perez will run to the "far left"...

PP, you might want to recalibrate your scale.

Nah PP is right here. Perez has openly flirted with socialism is on the left fringe of the party.

I guess this puts Perez in a pickle, because apparently people like you think he’s a socialist while party activists think he’s a hack.

The pickle announced last week:

Perez’s whole strategy is to what exactly? Carry MoCo establishment liberals, hope for a WaPo endorsement and prey that’s enough?

He’s only every won 1 election in his career and it was for a District 5 council seat in 2002 where he got under 10k votes. He then only served one term in elected office. Takes a lot of chutzpah to think he can be governor.

It worked for Terry McAuliffe! (Running DNC then run for Gov)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He’s only every won 1 election in his career and it was for a District 5 council seat in 2002 where he got under 10k votes. He then only served one term in elected office. Takes a lot of chutzpah to think he can be governor.

How many elections had Larry Hogan won in his career? How many terms in elected office had Larry Hogan served?