Guests in the condo pool. Call the police?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

The realtors who are selling some units most likely have copies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

The realtors who are selling some units most likely have copies?

Someone’s got to have copies but maybe they are afraid to get involved. At my current pool we have a limit of five guests per family unless it is a party, which needs to be set up ahead of time so that they could have proper lifeguard staffing. My previous pool had a limit of two guests unless it was a party and once again it had to be set up ahead of time so that they could have extra lifeguards present ( if it was over a certain amount of people ). Regardless, I don’t understand why the police were involved with interpreting the H away bylaws but maybe they were just trying to work things out civilly and things just dragged on. Personally, I’m reserving judgment until all the facts come out. I feel bad for both parties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

I can confirm that this is not a police matter, this is a civil matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

I can confirm that this is not a police matter, this is a civil matter.

Trespassing is most definitely a police matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hmmmmm. I have access to inside info. Police were called because 30 people were trespassing....bit different from 6 little kids. Guests left before mgmt got there. So who knows if these pics even match what shes talking about. Its BS

Here is where it said there were actually 30 people at the party.

Because some random on the Internet said it?
You cannot be that stupid???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hmmmmm. I have access to inside info. Police were called because 30 people were trespassing....bit different from 6 little kids. Guests left before mgmt got there. So who knows if these pics even match what shes talking about. Its BS

Here is where it said there were actually 30 people at the party.

Because some random on the Internet said it?
You cannot be that stupid???

Its more believable than a pack of sweet innocent kids (without any adults present) were doing absolutely nothing wrong! Notice how the photo she posted showed NO adults?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

I can confirm that this is not a police matter, this is a civil matter.

Trespassing is most definitely a police matter.

It's not trespassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

I can confirm that this is not a police matter, this is a civil matter.

Trespassing is most definitely a police matter.

It's not trespassing.

Not a great grasp of law on this thread. Trespassing is using/ or being on someone else property with their permission. Having a pool party without permission is trespassing. What’s so hard to understand about this ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hmmmmm. I have access to inside info. Police were called because 30 people were trespassing....bit different from 6 little kids. Guests left before mgmt got there. So who knows if these pics even match what shes talking about. Its BS

Here is where it said there were actually 30 people at the party.

Because some random on the Internet said it?
You cannot be that stupid???

Its more believable than a pack of sweet innocent kids (without any adults present) were doing absolutely nothing wrong! Notice how the photo she posted showed NO adults?

Obviously there were adults present. The owners were there. There were adults in the video. At birthday parties we often take groups pics of the children attending. That doesn’t mean there are no adults on site. Why are you being willfully obtuse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hmmmmm. I have access to inside info. Police were called because 30 people were trespassing....bit different from 6 little kids. Guests left before mgmt got there. So who knows if these pics even match what shes talking about. Its BS

Here is where it said there were actually 30 people at the party.

Because some random on the Internet said it?
You cannot be that stupid???

Its more believable than a pack of sweet innocent kids (without any adults present) were doing absolutely nothing wrong! Notice how the photo she posted showed NO adults?

Obviously there were adults present. The owners were there. There were adults in the video. At birthday parties we often take groups pics of the children attending. That doesn’t mean there are no adults on site. Why are you being willfully obtuse?

There were 10-12 kids in the picture I think. There were probably a few more younger or other ones not in the picture. Plus, each child probably had 1-2 parents. So, that was probably a 30 person party. They were very careful to pick and choose what they recorded and what they posted on social media. What happened before, what happened after and how did no one know the rules?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine the gall it takes to think your $1000 or $1500 rent entitles you to throw huge rager parties at a condo pool used by hundreds of paying RESIDENTS. Low class trash. I don’t know and I don’t care what race is involved here. It’s trash behavior, period.

Rager parties? We're talking little kids eating hamburgers on a Thursday afternoon after a frolic in the pool after being invited by the OWNERS of the unit. Rub your hands on the front of your pants because you my dear need to get a grip.

1-2 owners of a condo don’t have the right to invite 30 non-residents to the pool. There is no reputable condo association around that would allow this.

My fancy condo in Arlington doesn't have these rules.

But please, continue on. It's amazing that racists won't give up and just go onto bash something else.

How is it racist? Race was decided a the cause when that may or may not have been. The issue is did they need a permit/pay for or were even allowed to have a party there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We've lived in a condo, and the pool guest rules, while I don't recall them exactly, were extremely strict. There would have been no way to have over 10 guests over (how many people total??). This is not a minor matter - what if a kid drowns or gets hurt? We could reserve a room (not the pool) for a party, but the hourly rate was very high.

My condo doesn't have these rules. So, it really depends on the condo and I find the whole "well, these are the rules" defenses to be ridiculous.

It is very, very dangerous for police to be called on black people who are just going about their lives. I have yet to see any real confirmation about the rules, and I think it is telling and crazy and awful how much people will justify this terrible choice this woman made or in the alternative diminish, mock or ignore the valid, concerning fear these poor people were put in for just having a nice time at the pool.

But go on. This thread will probably have 100's of posts fighting and defending this woman before it dies a slow death and yet another racist story occurs. The racist will get busy defending that one then. Seen it for years on DCUM.

So, if a person is white or asian its ok to call the police on them if they are doing the wrong thing but if someone is of color then you cannot call just based on their skin color. That is a really racist thing to say and creates the racial tensions as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

I can confirm that this is not a police matter, this is a civil matter.

Trespassing is most definitely a police matter.

It's not trespassing.

Not a great grasp of law on this thread. Trespassing is using/ or being on someone else property with their permission. Having a pool party without permission is trespassing. What’s so hard to understand about this ?

In MD property owned by an HOA is required to have "no trespassing signs". Also, they can have the signs and a guest can invite you in, which negates the trespassing law.

If an owner invites a guest into a private area that they are not allowed to enter due to HOA bylaws, the guests are not at fault, the homeowner is in violation of HOA bylaws not Maryland trespassing laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone confirm if the poster acted within the condo policy?

No one seems to have the condo's bylaws. Not the caller, not the owners/hosts, no one.

I can confirm that this is not a police matter, this is a civil matter.

Trespassing is most definitely a police matter.

It's not trespassing.

Not a great grasp of law on this thread. Trespassing is using/ or being on someone else property with their permission. Having a pool party without permission is trespassing. What’s so hard to understand about this ?

In MD property owned by an HOA is required to have "no trespassing signs". Also, they can have the signs and a guest can invite you in, which negates the trespassing law.

If an owner invites a guest into a private area that they are not allowed to enter due to HOA bylaws, the guests are not at fault, the homeowner is in violation of HOA bylaws not Maryland trespassing laws.

Maryland owner with a community pool here. Signs are posted. The signs give the mangers of pool who are representative of the HOA and the owners the right to restrict use and ask people to leave the pool area for non compliance of pool rules as stated by the pool management/ workers. They have an absolute right to ask people to leave at their discretion and to call police if necessary for non compliance. People break in / use pools without permission all the time. The HOA has rights and they represent the tenants/ owners not the guests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:hmmmmm. I have access to inside info. Police were called because 30 people were trespassing....bit different from 6 little kids. Guests left before mgmt got there. So who knows if these pics even match what shes talking about. Its BS

Here is where it said there were actually 30 people at the party.

Because some random on the Internet said it?
You cannot be that stupid???

+1