Amazing that some people think working harder = so low in “positive personality, likability, courage, kindness and being widely respected. Amazing that some people think that being black and not as smart should get you in to an elite academic university. See what I did there. |
+1 assign them a number and make it race blind. |
|
“Rising anti-immigrant sentiment”? Source, please. |
It's yet to be demonstrated the Asians were discriminated against (raped). They are being used for ulterior purposes by a group that wants to eliminate affirmative action. When they lose, as I believe they will, it will establish a precedent and private colleges will be even freer to continue with holistic selection methods. Maybe the words "think carefully" sounded like I condone discrimination. I don't. But I would not like to see the elimination of any use of race in college admissions decisions as I think that will only hurt black and Hispanic applicants. |
Seems we should fight back then, no? Are you suggesting people just wait and suffer? A lost generation? |
Wrong. They may lose this lawsuit. It will build them up to file many more and eventually win. Asians have long been discriminated against but have never done much about it until now. It's time to break that "model minority" image and start demanding equal treatment. They will pave the way for other minorities, stuck in the affirmative action loop, which is both useful and demeaning. |
It's way beyond reasonable doubt that Asian Americans are being raped by admission offices every day, every week, every year. Signed. Not Asian American |
+1 Look what happened in Ca with Prop 209. Asian Americans are starting to make their voices heard. |
Amazing that the person who wrote this must have been one of the "not as smart" people based on the extremely poor writing. See what I did there? |
PP is saying Asians should keep sitting at the back of the bus where they belong and stop being so uppity. Harvard is for white folks. |
No, you don't make sense at all. I pity you. |
|
I think its clearly terrible if colleges are grading Asians down on the soft skills bc of bias. Do they have criteria for how they rate things like "positive personality" or other non-academic attributes. It is 100% valid to consider these traits for admissions but they have a process for doing do that isnt lets cut out students we dont like to favor white ppl.
At the same time the argument that the only way for Harvard to have an unbiased admissions is to "considered only academic achievement" is clearly off. The system we have looks beyond academics bc wider world does too (including ever office ive been in). |
Great journalism and summary. thanks for reading through the court papers so fast and getting it into the Associated Press/ NYTimes. I suspect more colleges and magnet programs will get the same subpoenas. |
Nobody wants to consider only academic achievement. Admissions need to be race and gender-blind. It's like the auditions for the greatest orchestras. They used to be composed of nearly 100% men. Do you know what happened when they put up screens between the judges and applicants, and placed carpets on the floor to hide the sound of high heels? The number of women shot up to nearly half the number of accepted candidates. All because the top people realized they were leaving an untapped pool of talent behind them. It's high time universities realized that non-whites represent a vast sources of skill and talent that should be put to use. No more affirmative action. The admissions office should not know how the candidate appears (sex, ethnicity, etc), so they can concentrate on who they really are. |