How does Trayon White still have a job?

[Anonymous]

Maybe Aaron Holmes will see this chaos and controversy as an opportunity and challenge White who won unopposed in 2016.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.

How long have you lived in "Dee-Cee"? The disbursement from the constituent service fund will result in a slap on the wrist at most. The more that the Post, Jewish organizations, others are 'on his ass', the more Trayon's base will see him as standing up to the Man. We've seen this playbook run in Ward 8 before.

DP. What are you saying? That if Jews stand up to an antisemite, the voters in Ward 8 dig in their heels? It sounds as if you're saying that there is so much hostility toward Jews from Ward 8 poor blacks (be honest.....that's who lives in Ward 8) that they'll WANT to keep the antisemite in office.

White is not out doing overtly anti-Semitic things. For instance, he is not marching in Charlottesville yelling, "Jews will not replace us". Rather, he made an ignorant statement that he didn't know had anti-Semitic implications and for which he apologized. His supporters don't see "Jews standing up to an anti-Semite", but rather people who have never been involved in helping Ward 8 launching unfair attacks on their Council Member. You may not agree with their perspective, and I don't, but it is still their perspective whether you agree with it or not. Ward 8 residents will not increase their support for White because they are hostile to Jews, but because like most people, they resent attacks by outsiders.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.

Somehow that doesn't make me feel better. Just shows that being an antisemite is fine and dandy, and it will be emphasized that he's being fired because of campaign finance laws, and nothing to do with his bigotry against Jews. The message is: dump all the shit you want on Jews, and you'll be OK.

That said, I'm glad he's toast.

I'm sorry to say it, but your attitude will make White more popular rather than less. From the perspective of the people he represents, White apologized for his initial remark, but that wasn't enough. He reached out to the Jewish community to be educated, but that wasn't enough. He toured the Holocaust Museum, but that wasn't enough. Now he is being asked to reject the support of a group that is in his community doing real, tangible work. You are literally demanding that hungry people turn down food because you don't like who is feeding them. How do you think that is going to go over?

White is not toast. He might be fined a small amount and he may receive a Council reprimand, but neither will have a negative impact on his electoral prospects. To the contrary, he will exploit both to increase his popularity. Washington Post criticism? Are you kidding me? He will hand out copies as campaign literature.

Why do you think Brandon Todd, Muriel Bowser's trained poodle, is asking for patience and understanding? Why do you think other Bowser supporters are out criticizing the Council Members who advocated censure? Why do you think Bowser herself has been so quiet? They know that White is far from being toast.

You seem more annoyed with the Jews for whom "an apology isn't enough" (actually, repeated apologies for repeated antisemitic behavior) than the repeated antisemtic behavior of a DC councilman. You ask,,,,,how many apologies are enough? I ask....how many indications of antisemtitsm are enough?

And it doesn't mean people in his district will go hungry if we get rid of the antisemtie. They will get another councilman who will represent them - one who doesn't diss Jews all the time. It is wrong to teach that bigotry toward one group of people is OK as long as your constituents are being served.

And finally, your response just proves it: antisemtism isn't all that serious to (many) DC liberals. They will overlook the most heinous behavior (like that from Farrakhan) as long as he's helping black people. That is totally unacceptable to many Jews. I know you would rather Jews keep accepting, tolerating, being patient - whatever - with antisemties. History has taught Jews that being "accepting" of racist attitudes toward them does not work.

The ironic thing is that you are quick to pounce on black or Muslim bigotry but expect all sorts of "forgiveness" and "patience" of and toward antisemties.

P.S. Even your examole, "he toured the Holocaust Memorial and that wasn't enough" fails to mention that he cared so little that he walked out in the middle of it and waited on the sidewalk. That spit-in-the-face was especially bad since he had just "aplogized" to Jews for his earlier antisemtitic comment (which he said he didn't know was antisemitic).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you go fishing for anti Semitism in a situation where it's exceptionally hard to prove that the intent was indeed to be anti Semitic , you end up with mofos twisting into pretzels because they've not gotten the outcome they hoped for .

You guys chose to make a big deal out of a situation that from the onset didn't need to evolve into the melodrama it's become . I'm convinced Mr White enjoys being a professional troll at this point , why shouldn't he? He stands to face little to no political fallout .

Who says one has to INTEND to be antisemtitic in order to BE antisemtitc? There are plenty of people who think less of black people, as an entire group. They don't necessarily intend to....they just do. And that makes them racist.

It's sad the degree to which some liberals on this forum twist them into pretzels because they can't face that Democrats, whom they consider so superior, could actually be antisemites. And so the excuses start. Either the guy is an idiotic. Or he's just ignorant. Or he is insensitive to antisemtism but not an actual antisemite. And now, he didn't INTEND to be antisemtitic.

The next time someone makes a bigoted remark against blacks, Muslims, whatever, I am going to defend him by insisting he is not prejudiced.....just that he ignorant or insensitive. Or that the struggle of blacks or Muslims isn't "his struggle." Or that he is just stupid. But racist? Naaaah.

I'm tired of people trying to equate anti Semitism to racism or to always compare themselves to blacks . Even by the most conservative standards , Jews haven't been subjected to what blacks have and continue to be subjected to in this country . Nice try

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you go fishing for anti Semitism in a situation where it's exceptionally hard to prove that the intent was indeed to be anti Semitic , you end up with mofos twisting into pretzels because they've not gotten the outcome they hoped for .

You guys chose to make a big deal out of a situation that from the onset didn't need to evolve into the melodrama it's become . I'm convinced Mr White enjoys being a professional troll at this point , why shouldn't he? He stands to face little to no political fallout .

Who says one has to INTEND to be antisemtitic in order to BE antisemtitc? There are plenty of people who think less of black people, as an entire group. They don't necessarily intend to....they just do. And that makes them racist.

It's sad the degree to which some liberals on this forum twist them into pretzels because they can't face that Democrats, whom they consider so superior, could actually be antisemites. And so the excuses start. Either the guy is an idiotic. Or he's just ignorant. Or he is insensitive to antisemtism but not an actual antisemite. And now, he didn't INTEND to be antisemtitic.

The next time someone makes a bigoted remark against blacks, Muslims, whatever, I am going to defend him by insisting he is not prejudiced.....just that he ignorant or insensitive. Or that the struggle of blacks or Muslims isn't "his struggle." Or that he is just stupid. But racist? Naaaah.

I'm tired of people trying to equate anti Semitism to racism or to always compare themselves to blacks . Even by the most conservative standards , Jews haven't been subjected to what blacks have and continue to be subjected to in this country . Nice try

Oh, oh....someone is trying to start up the Oppression Olympics.

[Anonymous]

I’m loving how all the sudden Ward 8 is of interest to so many. Maybe some good will come out of this heightened awareness and District residents will find a way to pay attention to some other issues that need addressing besides one fool’s big mouth.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:You seem more annoyed with the Jews for whom "an apology isn't enough" (actually, repeated apologies for repeated antisemitic behavior) than the repeated antisemtic behavior of a DC councilman. You ask,,,,,how many apologies are enough? I ask....how many indications of antisemtitsm are enough?

And it doesn't mean people in his district will go hungry if we get rid of the antisemtie. They will get another councilman who will represent them - one who doesn't diss Jews all the time. It is wrong to teach that bigotry toward one group of people is OK as long as your constituents are being served.

And finally, your response just proves it: antisemtism isn't all that serious to (many) DC liberals. They will overlook the most heinous behavior (like that from Farrakhan) as long as he's helping black people. That is totally unacceptable to many Jews. I know you would rather Jews keep accepting, tolerating, being patient - whatever - with antisemties. History has taught Jews that being "accepting" of racist attitudes toward them does not work.

The ironic thing is that you are quick to pounce on black or Muslim bigotry but expect all sorts of "forgiveness" and "patience" of and toward antisemties.

P.S. Even your examole, "he toured the Holocaust Memorial and that wasn't enough" fails to mention that he cared so little that he walked out in the middle of it and waited on the sidewalk. That spit-in-the-face was especially bad since he had just "aplogized" to Jews for his earlier antisemtitic comment (which he said he didn't know was antisemitic).

I'm not annoyed. I was describing the perspective of the people he represents. That is the only group that matters to him. You want to act like nobody but you has their own perspective. Your attitude is that your perspective is correct and anyone who doesn't agree with it is an anti-Semite. I understand your perspective, I think I understand White's perspective, and, of course, I have my own perspective.

You cannot point to one single blatantly anti-Semitic act by White. You are interpreting things to come to that conclusion. Why do you believe that he waited on the sidewalk at the museum rather than believing his explanation that he toured the museum separately from the group? His explanation actually makes more sense than the suggestion that he stood around on the sidewalk for a lengthy time. White doesn't seem like the sort to stand around doing nothing for very long.

You don't seem to realize that the Nation of Islam provides a number of social services in Ward 8, including providing food. If the DC government forces the NOI to stop doing that (and I'm not even sure how that would be possible), who is going to do it? Are you going to go to Ward 8 and hand out food?

I'm not overlooking the contribution to Farrakhan. To the contrary, I think that White should suffer whatever legal ramifications exist for that potentially illegal and clearly unethical contribution. But, I think that we need to understand that your attitude is that very poor people should refuse food and services because of things someone from Chicago said about people who don't live in Ward 8. I just don't see how you think that can be a winning argument.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.

How long have you lived in "Dee-Cee"? The disbursement from the constituent service fund will result in a slap on the wrist at most. The more that the Post, Jewish organizations, others are 'on his ass', the more Trayon's base will see him as standing up to the Man. We've seen this playbook run in Ward 8 before.

DP. What are you saying? That if Jews stand up to an antisemite, the voters in Ward 8 dig in their heels? It sounds as if you're saying that there is so much hostility toward Jews from Ward 8 poor blacks (be honest.....that's who lives in Ward 8) that they'll WANT to keep the antisemite in office.

White is not out doing overtly anti-Semitic things. For instance, he is not marching in Charlottesville yelling, "Jews will not replace us". Rather, he made an ignorant statement that he didn't know had anti-Semitic implications and for which he apologized. His supporters don't see "Jews standing up to an anti-Semite", but rather people who have never been involved in helping Ward 8 launching unfair attacks on their Council Member. You may not agree with their perspective, and I don't, but it is still their perspective whether you agree with it or not. Ward 8 residents will not increase their support for White because they are hostile to Jews, but because like most people, they resent attacks by outsiders.

Jeff you're making way too much sense for these assholes , if there's a demographic in this country that really needs to be extremely careful it's Jews . As America becomes increasingly less white , this sort of faux controversy will not move anyone . It's beyond obvious that the anti Semitic implication of Mr white comments wasn't what the 'tribe' makesnit out to be and yet .....

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.

How long have you lived in "Dee-Cee"? The disbursement from the constituent service fund will result in a slap on the wrist at most. The more that the Post, Jewish organizations, others are 'on his ass', the more Trayon's base will see him as standing up to the Man. We've seen this playbook run in Ward 8 before.

DP. What are you saying? That if Jews stand up to an antisemite, the voters in Ward 8 dig in their heels? It sounds as if you're saying that there is so much hostility toward Jews from Ward 8 poor blacks (be honest.....that's who lives in Ward 8) that they'll WANT to keep the antisemite in office.

White is not out doing overtly anti-Semitic things. For instance, he is not marching in Charlottesville yelling, "Jews will not replace us". Rather, he made an ignorant statement that he didn't know had anti-Semitic implications and for which he apologized. His supporters don't see "Jews standing up to an anti-Semite", but rather people who have never been involved in helping Ward 8 launching unfair attacks on their Council Member. You may not agree with their perspective, and I don't, but it is still their perspective whether you agree with it or not. Ward 8 residents will not increase their support for White because they are hostile to Jews, but because like most people, they resent attacks by outsiders.

Jeff nailed it.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Jeff you're making way too much sense for these assholes , if there's a demographic in this country that really needs to be extremely careful it's Jews . As America becomes increasingly less white , this sort of faux controversy will not move anyone . It's beyond obvious that the anti Semitic implication of Mr white comments wasn't what the 'tribe' makesnit out to be and yet .....

There are a variety of reactions to White, including a variety from individual Jews and Jewish groups. As such, I don't think it is fair or appropriate to refer to them as the "tribe". Certainly not all Jews in DC are reacting the way the prominent poster in this thread has been. All of us should be concerned about increased animosity between minority groups. Obviously there are some who would see increased black/Jewish tensions to be a positive development and we clearly don't want to play into their hands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you go fishing for anti Semitism in a situation where it's exceptionally hard to prove that the intent was indeed to be anti Semitic , you end up with mofos twisting into pretzels because they've not gotten the outcome they hoped for .

You guys chose to make a big deal out of a situation that from the onset didn't need to evolve into the melodrama it's become . I'm convinced Mr White enjoys being a professional troll at this point , why shouldn't he? He stands to face little to no political fallout .

Who says one has to INTEND to be antisemtitic in order to BE antisemtitc? There are plenty of people who think less of black people, as an entire group. They don't necessarily intend to....they just do. And that makes them racist.

It's sad the degree to which some liberals on this forum twist them into pretzels because they can't face that Democrats, whom they consider so superior, could actually be antisemites. And so the excuses start. Either the guy is an idiotic. Or he's just ignorant. Or he is insensitive to antisemtism but not an actual antisemite. And now, he didn't INTEND to be antisemtitic.

The next time someone makes a bigoted remark against blacks, Muslims, whatever, I am going to defend him by insisting he is not prejudiced.....just that he ignorant or insensitive. Or that the struggle of blacks or Muslims isn't "his struggle." Or that he is just stupid. But racist? Naaaah.

I'm tired of people trying to equate anti Semitism to racism or to always compare themselves to blacks . Even by the most conservative standards , Jews haven't been subjected to what blacks have and continue to be subjected to in this country . Nice try

Oh, oh....someone is trying to start up the Oppression Olympics.

You can always prove me wrong , I certainly didn't start the oppression qualifiers

[Anonymous]

I can honestly say that I'm less upset by Trayon's White's comments/actions than by the repetitive attempts here to say that they "aren't that bad."

I actually don't care what happens with Trayon White as an individual. What I would like is recognition that anti-semitism among people of color is on the rise, with the cause of the Palestinians a convenient cover for those accusations. For American Jews, it increasingly feels like (mostly mild, "all Jews are like this") anti-semitism is ok on the left and the right. It's alarming.

When you combine it with the rise in real anti-Jewish hate crimes here and around the world, Jews aren't sure what to think. It certainly feels like Jews are the last group anyone wants to defend ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Aaron Holmes will see this chaos and controversy as an opportunity and challenge White who won unopposed in 2016.

Someone seems overly invested in ward 8 all of a sudden

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can honestly say that I'm less upset by Trayon's White's comments/actions than by the repetitive attempts here to say that they "aren't that bad."

I actually don't care what happens with Trayon White as an individual. What I would like is recognition that anti-semitism among people of color is on the rise, with the cause of the Palestinians a convenient cover for those accusations. For American Jews, it increasingly feels like (mostly mild, "all Jews are like this") anti-semitism is ok on the left and the right. It's alarming.

When you combine it with the rise in real anti-Jewish hate crimes here and around the world, Jews aren't sure what to think. It certainly feels like Jews are the last group anyone wants to defend ...

Could you provide proof of your assertion before asking for any sort of recognition ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: ...it doesn't mean people in his district will go hungry...

On a side note, the people in Ward 8 ARE in fact hungry. There are currently three grocery stores servicing Wards 7 and 8 combined; most areas of the city average six grocery stores per ward. An online petition launched by 31-year-old Ward 7 resident Latoya Watson hopes to change that. Her campaign on the platform Spendrise calls for popular food delivery companies — including Caviar, Postmates and DoorDash — to expand their delivery services to include all of D.C., most notably Wards 7 and 8.

“There’s nowhere we can walk to go to the grocery store. … You have people in these communities where maybe they’re disabled, maybe they’re older and they can’t walk anywhere either, so a food delivery service is exactly what people like that need,” she said.

Since y’all are so interested and invested in what’s going on in Ward 8 go ahead and sign this petition to ensure food delivery services serve all Washingtonians equally by delivering to all eight wards.

https://www.spendrise.com/products/caviar-postmates-doordash-serve-ward-7-and-8