I would not turn it over to the school. They can be very rigid and might pass it on to the police. Now it becomes a question for the prosecutors office. Let’s say they prosecute the boy for trafficking in under age porn. Your dd is the recipient but maybe she has received or taken pictures herself or others and past them to other kids. Now your dd can be charged. You never know where thing will end up when the police are brought in. |
Completely agree. I'm appalled at the PPs insisting OP head directly to the police. Or even the school administration. The first thing to do is have OP's daughter confront this issue head-on. There seems to be this obsession with making girls into helpless victims rather than empowering them from the start. Of course, if the unwanted attention/behavior continues, even after she tells him to stop, etc. - then yes, parents and admin. will need to get involved. PPs - not everything is a #Metoo event! Kids need to learn to advocate for themselves first. And that goes for either girls OR boys - anyone receiving unwanted attention needs to be given the tools to deal with it directly. |
Then unless the behavior has continued, that's all that needs to be done. |
Not true. It's your choice what apps they use and how they use them. And there are plenty of kids who have happy social lives without Snapchat. I truly don't understand parents who just throw up their hands because "her social life" is more important than her safety. |
|
Do not contact the police unless you want someone doing that to you if your kid does something stupid. Have her email him "Please do not send me any more nude pictures of you. I do not find it appropriate and it makes me very uncomfortable." Then block him. You could CC the parents I suppose, but they might not believe it happened. |
At this age, going to parents for help and advice is advocating for oneself, and the best possible way to do it. It is good for kids to know their resources and to trust that those resources will have their backs. |
Yes, absolutely! I'm the one who wrote the language above. Apparently, OP's DD did that. Perfect -- great job! So, unless the kid sent another naked picture, the issue is closed, right? Problem solved. If not, what am I missing here? |
I’m the PP and I agree with you. Kids should definitely feel comfortable enough to go to their parents for advice first. My point was that the OP gave her daughter the right advice - that is, to tell him not to do that again. She could also block him, but has told her mom she wants to remain friends with him. If he continues the behavior, which I highly doubt, she could then block him and his parents should probably be told. I guess the point is that after discussion with parents, the girl (or boy!) should be able to vocalize to the offender that this behavior is unwanted and unacceptable. Only if it continues should things be escalated by the parents, and certainly, bringing in the police should be a LAST resort. |
I’m the PP right after you and I agree. Case closed, unless of course, another picture is sent. There is no need to exaggerate the stupidity of a 13 yo to a #MeToo moment, as some posters seem eager to do. |
| Itll happened again.. so get over it... your daughter's social life is more important to you. She didnt need to be on snap in the first place. |
Prove it. I'm not finding any stories that say Snapchats are kept on the recepient's phone. |
| DP. I am sorry to tell you that they are retrievable. I have heard it directly from the mouths of police officers and FBI agents, and with my own eyes I have seen the evidence, which has been legally retrieved through a warrant or with permission. Please do not delude yourself into thinking that once your phone has been wiped or the photo "deleted" that the photo is gone. |
In which case there would be court cases. SO cite your evidence, not just "mouths of police officers." |
| Why are people saying to involve the school if this didn't happen on school grounds or during school hours? When did schools have 24 hour responsibility for kids? I would have taken her phone and texted back that this is the parent and informed the kid he just sent child pornography because he is under 18 and could be arrested and be sent to jail and never to do it again. |
| Not going to delve into whether to tell the school or not issue. However, the school becomes involved if something impacts a child being able to access her/his education, even if it didn't happen on school grounds or during school hours. So, if (I wrote if, not that it is) sending the picture is considered bullying or harassment then the school is involved. In DC, bullying goes against DCPS policy & DC city statute. |